Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 971–978 | Cite as

10 cm H2O PEEP application in laparoscopic surgery and cerebral oxygenation: a comparative study with INVOS and FORESIGHT

  • Perihan Uçar Kemerci
  • Aslı Demir
  • Bahar Aydınlı
  • Çiğdem Yıldırım Güçlü
  • Ümit Karadeniz
  • Ömer Faruk Çiçek
  • İrfan Taşoğlu
  • Ayşegül Özgök
Article

Abstract

Introduction

In the present study, changes in hemodynamic parameters and cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) associated with 10 cm H2O PEEP application were investigated, which is assumed beneficial for the respiratory functions and oxygenation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) applied at 30° head-up left side position. Data gathered via two devices, namely INVOS and FORESIGHT, were compared.

Methods

After both the ethics committee approval from the hospital and patients’ written consents were obtained, patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery (only ASA I–II) were randomly divided into two groups (Clinical trials protocol NCT02071550). Sensors of INVOS and FORESIGHT devices were placed on the right side at the forehead region. In total, 11 evaluation periods were formed, namely pre-induction (1st period), post-induction (2nd period), abdominal insufflation outset (3rd period), post-insufflation at 5-min intervals (4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th period), at the end of insufflation (9th period), at the end of operation (10th period), and at the end of anesthesia (11th period). While one of the groups did not receive PEEP (ZEEP group), the other group received 10 cm H2O along with abdominal insufflation (PEEP group). Demographic data, hemodynamic values, and rSO2 values were recorded for both groups at all 11 periods.

Results

A total of 44 patients in two groups, each group containing 22 individuals, were included in the study. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, etCO2 and SO2 values, and demographic data were found to be similar in both groups. Heart rate was observed to be higher in the PEEP group starting with the PEEP administration. INVOS rSO2 values were found similar in both groups. However, FORESIGHT rSO2 values were found to be higher in the PEEP group compared to the ZEEP group. No patient had cerebral desaturation in both groups throughout the study.

Discussion

Application of PEEP with 10 cm H2O during abdominal insufflation could increase the rSO2 value and heart rate in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, all changes observed were within normal limits. FORESIGHT device yielded more compatible results with hemodynamic data compared to INVOS.

Keywords

Cerebral oximeter Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Near-infrared spectroscopy Anesthesia Positive end-expiratory pressure Cerebral oxygen saturation 

Notes

Disclosures

Authors indicate that there is no financial relationship with the organization that sponsored the research. Perihan Uçar Kemerci, Aslı Demir, Bahar Aydınlı, Çiğdem Yıldırım Güçlü, Ümit Karadeniz, Ömer Faruk Çiçek, İrfan Taşoğlu, and Ayşegül Özgök declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Pelosi P, Foti G, Cereda M, Vicardi P, Gattinoni L (1996) Effects of carbon dioxide insufflations for laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the respiratory system. Anaesthesia 51(8):744–749CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maracajá-Neto LF, Verçosa N, Roncally AC, Giannella A, Bozza FA, Lessa MA (2009) Beneficial effects of high positive end-expiratory pressure in lung respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:210–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Erlandsson K, Odenstedt H, Lundin S, Stenqvist O (2006) Positive end-expiratory pressure optimization using electric impedance tomography in morbidly obese patients during laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50(7):833–839CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tusman G, Böhm SH, Vazguez de Anda GF, do Campo JL, Lachmann B (1999) “Alveolar recruitment strategy” improves arterial oxygenation during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 82(1):8–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kraut EJ, Anderson JT, Safwat A, Barbosa R, Wolfe BM (1999) Impairment of cardiac performance by laparoscopy in patients receiving positive end-expiratory pressure. Arch Surg 134(1):76–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wittgen CM, Andrus CH, Fitzgerald SD, Baudendistel LJ, Dahms TE, Kaminski DL (1991) Analysis of the hemodynamic and ventilator effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 126(8):997–1000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lui SY, Leighton T, Davis I, Klein S, Lipmann M, Bongard F (1991) Prospective analysis of cardiopulmonary responses to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1(5):241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O’Malley C, Cunningham AJ (2001) Physiologic changes during laparoscopy. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 1:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhandari D, Tidke S, Sharma V, Dongre H, Garg D, Dhande P (2012) Hemodynamic changes associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of oral clonidine premedication. J Pharmacy 2(4):72–77Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iberti TJ, Kathy KM, Gentili DR, Hirsch S, Benjamin E (1987) A simple technique to acutely determine intra-abdominal pressure. Crit Care Med 15(12):1140–1142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shelly MP, Robinson AA, Hesford JW, Park GR (1987) Haemodynamic effects following surgical release of increased intraabdominal pressure. Br J Anaesth 59(6):800–805CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Diebel L, Saxe J, Dulchavsky S (1992) Effect of intra-abdominal pressure on abdominal wall blood flow. Am Surg 58(9):573–576PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Myre K, Rostrup M, Buanes T, Stocland O (1998) Plasma catecholamines and haemodynamic changes during pneumoperitoneum. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 42:343–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strebel S, Kaufmann M, Guardiola PM, Schaefer HG (1994) Cerebral vasomotor responsiveness to carbon dioxide is preserved during propofol and midazolam anesthesia in humans. Anesth Analg 78:884–888PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haring HP, Hormann C, Schalow S, Benzer A (1994) Continuous positive airway pressure breathing increases cerebral blood flow velocity in humans. Anesth Analg 79:883–885PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bowie RA, O’Connor PJ, Hardman JG, Mahajan RP (2001) The effect of continuous positive airway pressure on cerebral blood flow velocity in awake volunteers. Anesth Analg 92:415–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bedforth NM, Hardman JG, Nathanson MH (2000) Cerebral hemodynamic response to the introduction of desflurane: a comparison with sevoflurane. Anesth Analg 91:152–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Josephs LG, Este-McDonald JR, Birkett DH, Hirsch EF (1994) Diagnostic laparoscopy increases intracranial pressure. J Trauma 36:815–819CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Este-McDonald JR, Josephs LG, Birkett DH, Hirsch EF (1995) Changes in intracranial pressure associated with apneumic retractors. Arch Surg 130:362–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Halverson A, Buchanan R, Jacobs L (1998) Evaluation of mechanism of increased intracranial pressure with insufflation. Surg Endosc 12:266–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosin D, Rosenthal RJ (2001) Adverse hemodynamic effects of intraabdominal pressure—is it all in the head. Int J Surg Investig 2:35–45Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kitajima T, Okuda Y, Yamaguchi S et al (1998) Response of cerebral oxygen metabolism in the head-up position during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(6):449–452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Park EY, Koo BN, Min KT, Nam SH (2009) The effect of pneumoperitoneum in the steep Trendelenburg position on cerebral oxygenation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53(7):895–899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Macleod D, Ikeda K, Vacchiano C (2009) Simultaneous comparison of FORESIGHT and INVOS cerebral oximeters to jugular bulb and arterial co-oximetry measurements in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg 108:101–104Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Szczapa T, Karpiński Ł, Moczko J, Weindling M, Kornacka A, Wróblewska K, Adamczak A, Jopek A, Chojnacka K, Gadzinowski J (2013) Comparison of cerebral tissue oxygenation values in full term and preterm newborns by the simultaneous use of two near-infrared spectroscopy devices: an absolute and a relative trending oximeter. J Biomed Opt 18(8):87006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hessel TW, Hyttel-Sorensen S, Greisen G (2014) Cerebral oxygenation after birth—a comparison of INVOS(®) and FORE-SIGHT™ near-infrared spectroscopy oximeters. Acta Paediatr 103(5):488–493PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moerman A, Vandenplas G, Bove T, Wouters PF, De Hert SG (2013) Relation between mixed venous oxygen saturation and cerebral oxygen saturation measured by absolute and relative near-infrared spectroscopy during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Br J Anaesth 110(2):258–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dexter SP, Vucevic M, Gibson J, McMahon MJ (1999) Hemodynamic consequence of high and low pressure capnoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 13:376–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Perihan Uçar Kemerci
    • 1
  • Aslı Demir
    • 1
  • Bahar Aydınlı
    • 1
  • Çiğdem Yıldırım Güçlü
    • 2
  • Ümit Karadeniz
    • 1
  • Ömer Faruk Çiçek
    • 3
  • İrfan Taşoğlu
    • 3
  • Ayşegül Özgök
    • 1
  1. 1.Anesthesiology DepartmentTürkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Education and Research HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesia, Medical FacultyAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Cardiac SurgeryTürkiye Yüksek Ihtisas Education and Research HospitalAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations