Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 961–970 | Cite as

Intermittent Pringle maneuver versus continuous hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion using extra-glissonian approach in laparoscopic liver resection

  • Yu ZhangEmail author
  • Hongji YangEmail author
  • Xiaofan Deng
  • Yunfei Chen
  • Shikai Zhu
  • Chen Kai
Article

Abstract

Background

Despite accumulated experience and advancing techniques for laparoscopic hepatectomy, bleeding remains the major concern during parenchymal transection. The vascular inflow control technique is still important to decrease intraoperative blood loss. The objective of this study was to compare intermittent Pringle with continuous hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion using extra-glissonian approach in laparoscopic liver resection.

Methods

Between January 2011 and January 2015, a total of 79 consecutive patients with tumors locating either in the right or in the left hemiliver were included into this retrospective study (45 in the Pringle group vs. 34 in the half-Pringle group). Preoperative clinical characteristics, intraoperative details, postoperative complications and outcomes of patients were compared.

Results

The two groups were well matched according to clinical characteristics, tumor features, types of liver resection and histopathology (P > 0.05). The mean operative time (247.5 ± 61.3 vs. 221.4 ± 48.7 min, P = 0.0446), ischemic duration (62.8 ± 28.3 vs. 44.1 ± 20.5 min, P = 0.0017) and overall declamping time (21.2 ± 8.2 vs. 0.9 ± 1.9 min, P < 0.05) were significantly longer in the Pringle group than in the half-Pringle group. The mean amount of intraoperative blood loss (568.2 ± 325.1 vs. 420.7 ± 307.2 mL, P = 0.0444) and transfusion (266.1 ± 123.4 vs. 203.2 ± 144.6 mL, P = 0.0406) were significantly greater in the Pringle group. The overall operative morbidity rate was significantly higher in the Pringle group (40 vs. 17.6 %, P = 0.0324). The Pringle group was associated with significantly higher alanine aminotransferase and aspartate transaminase levels on postoperative day (POD) 7 and lower albumin levels on PODs 1 and 3 (P < 0.05). The C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in the Pringle group than in the half-Pringle group on POD 1 (37.5 ± 21.4 vs. 28.2 ± 19.0 mg/L, P = 0.0484), POD 3 (114.0 ± 53.4 vs. 90.6 ± 47.9 mg/L, P = 0.0474) and POD 7 (54.9 ± 29.8 vs. 40.1 ± 26.4 mg/L, P = 0.0245).

Conclusion

Continuous hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion using extra-glissonian approach offers the advantages of less operative time and blood loss, less injury and better recovery in laparoscopic liver resection.

Keywords

Extra-glissonian approach Laparoscopic liver resection Liver neoplasm Pringle maneuver Hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grants from Health Department of Sichuan Province, China, No. 130134, and Doctor Funding of Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences.

Disclosures

Drs. Yu Zhang, Hongji Yang, Xiaofan Deng, Yunfei Chen, Shikai Zhu and Chen Kai have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Bai DS, Chen P, Qian JJ, Yao J, Jin SJ, Wang XD, Jiang GQ (2015) Modified laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic hemangioma. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4048-y Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xiao L, Li JW, Zheng SG (2014) Totally laparoscopic ALPPS in the treatment of cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4000-1 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shelat VG, Cipriani F, Basseres T, Armstrong TH, Takhar AS, Pearce NW, AbuHilal M (2014) Pure laparoscopic liver resection for large malignant tumors: does size matter? Ann Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4107-6 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hilal MA, van der Poel MJ, Samim M, Besselink MG, Flowers D, Stedman B, Pearce NW (2015) Laparoscopic liver resection for lesions adjacent to major vasculature: feasibility, safety and oncological efficiency. J Gastrointest Surg. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2739-2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tranchart H, O’Rourke N, Van Dam R, Gaillard M, Lainas P, Sugioka A, Wakabayashi G, Dagher I (2015) Bleeding control during laparoscopic liver resection: a review of literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.217 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scatton O, Brustia R, Belli G, Pekolj J, Wakabayashi G, Gayet B (2015) What kind of energy devices should be used for laparoscopic liver resection? Recommendations from a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.213 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Otsuka Y, Kaneko H, Cleary SP, Buell JF, Cai X, Wakabayashi G (2015) What is the best technique in parenchymal transection in laparoscopic liver resection? Comprehensive review for the clinical question on the 2nd international consensus conference on laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.216 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Müller MK, Petrowsky H, Clavien PA (2008) Techniques of vascular control and protective strategies for parenchymal transection. In: Lau WY (ed) Hepatocellular carcinoma. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, pp 507–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nomi T, Fuks D, Govindasamy M, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B (2015) Risk factors for complications after laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 102(3):254–260. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9726 (Epub 2014 Dec 17) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dua MM, Worhunsky DJ, Hwa K, Poultsides GA, Norton JA, Visser BC (2014) Extracorporeal Pringle for laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3801-6 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nomi T, Fuks D, Agrawal A, Govindasamy M, Araki K, Gayet B (2015) Modified Pringle maneuver for laparoscopic liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol 22(3):852. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4088-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jiao H, Tan J, Chu Y, Zhu Z, Dong JH (2014) Modified hepatic vascular occlusion facilitates hepatectomy for malignant hepatic tumor in laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24(6):506–511. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182a2b08d PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fu SY, Lau WY, Li G-G, Tang QH, Li AJ, Pan ZY, Huang G, Yin L, Wu MC, Lai EC, Zhou WP (2011) A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare Pringle maneuver, hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion, and main portal vein inflow occlusion in partial hepatectomy. Am J Surg 201:62–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ni JS, Lau WY, Yang Y, Pan Z-Y, Wang Z-G, Liu H, Wu MC, Zhou WP (2013) A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare Pringle maneuver, hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion, and main portal vein inflow occlusion in partial hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 17:1414–1421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liang G, Wen T, Yan L, Li BO, Wu G, Yang J, Lu B, Chen Z, Liao Z, Ran S, Yu Z (2009) A prospective randomized comparison of continuous hemihepatic with intermittent total hepatic inflow occlusion in hepatectomy for liver tumors. Hepatogastroenterology 56:745–750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen YJ, Zhen ZJ, Chen HW, Lai EC, Deng FW, Li QH, Lau WY (2014) Laparoscopic liver resection under hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion using the lowering of hilar plate approach. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 13:508–512. doi: 10.1016/S1499-3872(14)60293-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Herman P, Krüger J, Lupinacci R, Coelho F, Perini M (2013) Laparoscopic bisegmentectomy 6 and 7 using a Glissonian approach and a half-Pringle maneuver. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2681-x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rotellar F, Pardo F, Benito A, Martí-Cruchaga P, Zozaya G, Pedano N (2012) A novel extra-glissonian approach for totally laparoscopic left hepatectomy. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2242-3 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hepp J, Couinaud C (1956) Approach to and use of the left hepatic duct in reparation of the common bile duct. Presse Med 64:947–948PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Twaij A, Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, Gall T, Darzi A, Jiao LR (2014) Laparoscopic vs open approach to resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with known cirrhosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 20:8274–8281. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8274 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fuks D, Cauchy F, Ftériche S, Nomi T, Schwarz L, Dokmak S, Scatton O, Fusco G, Belghiti J, Gayet B, Soubrane O (2015) Laparoscopy decreases pulmonary complications in patients undergoing major liver resection: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001140 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Siniscalchi A, Ercolani G, Tarozzi G, Gamberini L, Cipolat L, Pinna AD, Faenza S (2014) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: differences in intraoperative and early postoperative outcome among cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma—a retrospective observational study. HPB Surg. doi: 10.1155/2014/871251 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yamashita Y, Ikeda T, Kurihara T, Yoshida Y, Takeishi K, Itoh S, Harimoto N, Kawanaka H, Shirabe K, Maehara Y (2014) Long-term favorable surgical results of laparoscopic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a single-center experience over a 10-year period. J Am Coll Surg 219(6):1117–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.09.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yoon S, Kim K, Jung D, Yu A, Lee S (2014) Oncological and surgical results of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC less than 5 cm: case-matched analysis. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3980-1 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ahn KS, Kang KJ, Kim YH, Kim TS, Lim TJ (2014) A propensity score-matched case–control comparative study of laparoscopic and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24(12):872–877. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0273 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Coles SR, Besselink MG, Serin KR, Alsaati H, Di Gioia P, Samim M, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2015) Total laparoscopic management of lesions involving liver segment 7. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4052-2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xiang L, Xiao L, Li J, Chen J, Fan Y, Zheng S (2015) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in the posterosuperior liver segments. World J Surg. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-2946-3 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Laurent A, Cherqui D, Lesurtel M, Brunetti F, Tayar C, Fagniez PL (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic liver disease. Arch Surg 138:763–769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Figueras J, Lopez-Ben S, Llado L, Rafecas A, Torras J, Ramos E, Fabregat J, Jaurrieta E (2003) Hilar dissection versus the “glissonean” approach and stapling of the pedicle for major hepatectomies: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 238:111–119PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Blumgart LH, Hann LE (2000) Surgical and radiologic anatomy of the liver and biliary tract. In: Blumgart LH, Fong Y (eds) Surgery of the liver and biliary tract, chap 1, 3rd edn. WB Saunders Co. Ltd., London, pp 21–22Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Giordano M, Lopez-Ben S, Codina-Barreras A, Pardina B, Falgueras L, Torres-Bahi S, Albiol M, Castro E, Figueras J (2010) Extra-glissonian approach in liver resection. HPB (Oxford) 12:94–100PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tranchart H, Gaillard M, Chirica M, Ferretti S, Perlemuter G, Naveau S, Dagher I (2014) Multivariate analysis of risk factors for postoperative complications after laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3965-0 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jiang G-Q, Chen P, Qian J-J, Yao J, Wang X-D, Jin S-J, Bai D-S (2014) Perioperative advantages of modified laparoscopic vs open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection. World J Gastroenterol 20(27):9146–9153. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.9146 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Muscari A, Collini A, Fabbri E, Giovagnoli M, Napoli C, Rossi V, Vizioli L, Bonfiglioli A, Magalotti D, Puddu GM, Zoli M (2014) Changes of liver enzymes and bilirubin during ischemic stroke: mechanisms and possible significance. BMC Neurol 14:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-122 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Third Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences (Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital)Chinese Academy of SciencesChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations