Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 739–744 | Cite as

Outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic colectomy surgery in obese patients: a case-matched study

  • Deborah S. Keller
  • Sergio Ibarra
  • Juan Ramon Flores-Gonzalez
  • Oscar Moreno Ponte
  • Nisreen Madhoun
  • T. Bartley Pickron
  • Eric M. Haas
Article

Abstract

Background

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is safe and feasible for benign and malignant colorectal diseases. SILS offers several patient-related benefits over multiport laparoscopy. However, its use in obese patients has been limited from concerns of technical difficulty, oncologic compromise, and higher complication and conversion rates. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of SILS for colectomy in obese patients.

Methods

Review of a prospective database identified patients undergoing elective colectomy using SILS from 2009 to 2014. They were stratified into obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and non-obese cohorts (BMI < 30 kg/m2) and then matched on patient characteristics, diagnosis, and operative procedure. Demographic and perioperative outcome data were evaluated. The primary outcome measures were operative time, length of stay (LOS), and conversion, complication, and readmission rates for each cohort.

Results

A total of 160 patients were evaluated—80 in each cohort. Patients were well matched in demographics, diagnosis, and procedure variables. The obese cohort had significantly higher BMI (p < 0.001) and ASA scores (p = 0.035). Operative time (176.9 ± 64.0 vs. 144.4 ± 47.2 min, p < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (89.0 ± 139.5 vs. 51.6 ± 38.0 ml, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the obese. There were no significant differences in conversion rates (p = 0.682), final incision length (p = 0.088), LOS (p = 0.332), postoperative complications (p = 0.430), or readmissions (p = 1.000) in the obese versus non-obese. Further, in malignant cases, lymph nodes harvested (p = 0.757) and negative distal margins (p = 1.000) were comparable across cohorts.

Conclusions

Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy in obese patients had significantly longer operative times, but comparable conversion rates, oncologic outcomes, lengths of stay, complication, and readmission rates as the non-obese cohorts. In the obese, where higher morbidity rates are typically associated with surgical outcomes, SILS may be the ideal platform to optimize outcomes in colorectal surgery. With additional operative time, the obese can realize the same clinical and quality benefits of minimally invasive surgery as the non-obese.

Keywords

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery Obesity Colorectal surgery Minimally invasive surgery Healthcare outcomes 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Drs. Madhu Ragupathi MD and Javier Nieto MD for assisting with data collection.

Disclosures

Drs. Keller, Ibarra, Moreno-Ponte, Madhoun, and Flores-Gonzalez have no pertinent conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Dr. Pickron is a consultant for Ethicon Endosugery. Dr. Haas is a consultant for Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

References

  1. 1.
    Baskin ML, Ard J, Franklin F, Allison DB (2005) Prevalence of obesity in the United States. Obes Rev 6:5–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang Y, Beydoun MA (2007) The obesity epidemic in the United States–gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiol Rev 29:6–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morrill AC, Chinn CD (2004) The obesity epidemic in the United States. J Public Health Policy 25:353–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calle EE, Kaaks R (2004) Overweight, obesity and cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer 4:579–591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH (1999) The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA 282:1523–1529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gendall KA, Raniga S, Kennedy R, Frizelle FA (2007) The impact of obesity on outcome after major colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:2223–2237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iorio T, Blumberg D (2014) Laparoscopic colectomy is feasible in the mega-obese patient using a standardized technique. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10:1005–1008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vaccaro CA, Rossi GL, Quintana GO, Soriano ER, Vaccarezza H, Rubinstein F (2014) Laparoscopic colorectal resections: a simple predictor model and a stratification risk for conversion to open surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 57:869–874CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Velchuru VR, Domajnko B, deSouza A et al (2014) Obesity increases the risk of postoperative peripheral neuropathy after minimally invasive colon and rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 57:187–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wick EC, Hirose K, Shore AD et al (2011) Surgical site infections and cost in obese patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 146:1068–1072CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H et al (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142:298–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F et al (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Makino T, Trencheva K, Shukla PJ et al (2014) The influence of obesity on short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a case-matched study of 152 patients. Surgery 156:661–668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cai Y, Zhou Y, Li Z, Xiang J, Chen Z (2013) Surgical outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer in obese patients: a comparative study with open colectomy. Oncol Lett 6:1057–1062PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Poulsen M, Ovesen H (2012) Is laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in obese patients associated with an increased risk? Short-term results from a single center study of 425 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1554–1558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krane MK, Allaix ME, Zoccali M et al (2013) Does morbid obesity change outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease? Review of 626 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 216:986–996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hardiman K, Chang ET, Diggs BS, Lu KC (2013) Laparoscopic colectomy reduces morbidity and mortality in obese patients. Surg Endosc 27:2907–2910CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Poon JT, Cheung CW, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 26:2729–2734CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vasilakis V, Clark CE, Liasis L, Papaconstantinou HT (2013) Noncosmetic benefits of single-incision laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: a case-matched comparison with multiport laparoscopic technique. J Surg Res 180:201–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chambers WM, Bicsak M, Lamparelli M, Dixon AR (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in complex colorectal surgery: a technique offering potential and not just cosmesis. Colorectal Dis 13:393–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bulut O, Nielsen CB, Jespersen N (2011) Single-port access laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: initial experience with 10 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 54:803–809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim SJ, Ryu GO, Choi BJ et al (2011) The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 254:933–940CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2010) Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for benign disease. Colorectal Dis 12:61–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Geisler D, Garrett T (2011) Single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single surgeon experience of 102 consecutive cases. Tech Coloproctol 15:397–401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miller S, Causey MW, Damle A, Maykel J, Steele S (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: training the next generation. Surg Endosc 27:1784–1790CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Geisler DP (2010) Laparoscopic single-port colectomy for sigmoid cancer. Tech Coloproctol 14:253–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Geisler DP, Condon ET, Remzi FH (2010) Single incision laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileopouch anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 12:941–943CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rieger NA, Lam FF (2010) Single-incision laparoscopically assisted colectomy using standard laparoscopic instrumentation. Surg Endosc 24:888–890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ross H, Steele S, Whiteford M et al (2011) Early multi-institution experience with single-incision laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 54:187–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Aytac E, Turina M, Gorgun E, Stocchi L, Remzi FH, Costedio MM (2014) Single-port laparoscopic colorectal resections in obese patients are as safe and effective as conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 28:2884–2889CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sakamoto K, Niwa S, Tanaka M, Goto M, Sengoku H, Tomiki Y (2007) Influence of obesity on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer. J Minim Access Surg 3:98–103PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fung AK, Aly EH (2012) Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. Br J Surg 99:1353–1364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Leroy J, Cahill RA, Asakuma M, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J (2009) Single-access laparoscopic sigmoidectomy as definitive surgical management of prior diverticulitis in a human patient. Arch Surg 144:173–179 discussion 179 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Champagne BJ, Lee EC, Leblanc F, Stein SL, Delaney CP (2011) Single-incision vs straight laparoscopic segmental colectomy: a case-controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:183–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2003) Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 238:67–72PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Delaney CP, Marcello PW, Sonoda T, Wise P, Bauer J, Techner L (2010) Gastrointestinal recovery after laparoscopic colectomy: results of a prospective, observational, multicenter study. Surg Endosc 24:653–661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Champagne BJ, Delaney CP (2007) Laparoscopic approaches to rectal cancer. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 20:237–248PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247:819–824CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah S. Keller
    • 1
  • Sergio Ibarra
    • 1
  • Juan Ramon Flores-Gonzalez
    • 1
  • Oscar Moreno Ponte
    • 1
  • Nisreen Madhoun
    • 1
  • T. Bartley Pickron
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eric M. Haas
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Colorectal Surgical AssociatesHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Division of Minimally Invasive Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Texas Medical School at HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations