Electromagnetic organ tracking allows for real-time compensation of tissue shift in image-guided laparoscopic rectal surgery: results of a phantom study
- 410 Downloads
Laparoscopic resection is a minimally invasive treatment option for rectal cancer but requires highly experienced surgeons. Computer-aided technologies could help to improve safety and efficiency by visualizing risk structures during the procedure. The prerequisite for such an image guidance system is reliable intraoperative information on iatrogenic tissue shift. This could be achieved by intraoperative imaging, which is rarely available. Thus, the aim of the present study was to develop and validate a method for real-time deformation compensation using preoperative imaging and intraoperative electromagnetic tracking (EMT) of the rectum.
Three models were compared and evaluated for the compensation of tissue deformation. For model A, no compensation was performed. Model B moved the corresponding points rigidly to the motion of the EMT sensor. Model C used five nested linear regressions with increasing level of complexity to compute the deformation (C1–C5). For evaluation, 14 targets and an EMT organ sensor were fit into a silicone-molded rectum of the OpenHELP phantom. Following a computed tomography, the image guidance was initiated and the rectum was deformed in the same way as during surgery in a total of 14 experimental runs. The target registration error (TRE) was measured for all targets in different positions of the rectum.
The mean TRE without correction (model A) was 32.8 ± 20.8 mm, with only 19.6 % of the measurements below 10 mm (80.4 % above 10 mm). With correction, the mean TRE could be reduced using the rigid correction (model B) to 6.8 ± 4.8 mm with 78.7 % of the measurements being <10 mm. Using the most complex linear regression correction (model C5), the error could be reduced to 2.9 ± 1.4 mm with 99.8 % being below 10 mm.
In laparoscopic rectal surgery, the combination of electromagnetic organ tracking and preoperative imaging is a promising approach to compensating for intraoperative tissue shift in real-time.
KeywordsRectal cancer Laparoscopy Image-guided surgery Motion compensation
This study was conducted within the Research Training Group 1126 Intelligent Surgery and the Transregional Collaborative Research Center 125 Cognition-guided Surgery, both funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG; Projects A01 and A02). The authors thank Ms. Béivin Pyne for careful review of the manuscript as a native speaker.
M. Wagner, M. Gondan, C. Zöllner, J. J. Wünscher, F. Nickel, L. Albala, A. Groch, S. Suwelack, S. Speidel, L. Maier-Hein, B. P. Müller-Stich and H. G. Kenngott have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 6.Wysocka B, Kassam Z, Lockwood G, Brierley J, Dawson LA, Buckley CA, Jaffray D, Cummings B, Kim J, Wong R, Ringash J (2010) Interfraction and respiratory organ motion during conformal radiotherapy in gastric cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77:53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.046 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Kenngott HG, Wagner M, Gondan M, Nickel F, Nolden M, Fetzer A, Weitz J, Fischer L, Speidel S, Meinzer H-P, Böckler D, Büchler MW, Müller-Stich BP (2014) Real-time image guidance in laparoscopic liver surgery: first clinical experience with a guidance system based on intraoperative CT imaging. Surg Endosc 28:933–940. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3249-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Nolden M, Zelzer S, Seitel A, Wald D, Müller M, Franz AM, Maleike D, Fangerau M, Baumhauer M, Maier-Hein L, Maier-Hein KH, Meinzer H-P, Wolf I (2013) The Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit: challenges and advances : 10 years of open-source development. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8:607–620. doi: 10.1007/s11548-013-0840-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kenngott HG, Wünscher JJ, Wagner M, Preukschas A, Wekerle AL, Neher P, Suwelack S, Speidel S, Nickel F, Oladokun D, Maier-Hein L, Dillmann R, Meinzer HP, Müller-Stich BP (2015) OpenHELP (Heidelberg laparoscopy phantom): development of an open-source surgical evaluation and training tool. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4094-0 Google Scholar
- 15.R Core Team (2012) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- 19.Nakamoto M, Nakada K, Sato Y, Konishi K, Hashizume M, Tamura S (2008) Intraoperative magnetic tracker calibration using a magneto-optic hybrid tracker for 3-D ultrasound-based navigation in laparoscopic surgery. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27:255–270. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2007.911003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Nakamoto M, Ukimura O, Gill IS, Mahadevan A, Miki T, Hashizume M, Sato Y (2008) Realtime organ tracking for endoscopic augmented reality visualization using miniature wireless magnetic tracker. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on medical imaging and augmented reality. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 359–366Google Scholar
- 24.Maier-Hein L, Tekbas A, Seitel A, Pianka F, Müller SA, Satzl S, Schawo S, Radeleff B, Tetzlaff R, Franz AM, Müller-Stich BP, Wolf I, Kauczor H-U, Schmied BM, Meinzer H-P (2008) In vivo accuracy assessment of a needle-based navigation system for CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of the liver. Med Phys 35:5385–5396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Beller S, Eulenstein S, Lange T, Hünerbein M, Schlag PM (2009) Upgrade of an optical navigation system with a permanent electromagnetic position control: a first step towards “navigated control” for liver surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:165–170. doi: 10.1007/s00534-008-0040-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Shekhar R, Dandekar O, Bhat V, Philip M, Lei P, Godinez C, Sutton E, George I, Kavic S, Mezrich R, Park A (2010) Live augmented reality: a new visualization method for laparoscopic surgery using continuous volumetric computed tomography. Surg Endosc 24:1976–1985. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0890-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Nickel F, Kenngott HG, Neuhaus J, Sommer CM, Gehrig T, Kolb A, Gondan M, Radeleff BA, Schaible A, Meinzer H-P, Gutt CN, Müller-Stich B-P (2013) Navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy: experimental study in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 27:3663–3670. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2941-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar