Advertisement

Endoluminal perforation of a magnetic antireflux device

Abstract

Background

The history of surgical antireflux treatment is coined by the search for better alternatives to Nissen fundoplication. Implantable devices are one option, beginning with the “Angelchik™” prosthesis 30 years ago. However, this procedure was left soon because of the high rate of foreign body connected problems (migration, perforation). A modern approach is a magnetic sphincter augmentation device (LINX® Reflux Management System, Torax Medical, Shoreview, MN, USA), a magnetic chain which is implanted laparoscopically. Advantages reported are simplicity to apply and good results in reflux control, with up to now only rare complication rates as reported in the literature (Lipham et al. in Dis Esophagus, 2014).

Methods

We report one case of erosion of the esophagus by a LINX® system resulting in severe dysphagia.

Results

A complete endoluminal removal could be achieved by a prototype OTSC-clip remover. Complete remission could be achieved. The technique is presented in detail (video).

Conclusions

In principle, total endoscopic removal of the LINX® device is feasible in case of major erosion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Lipham JC, Taiganides PA, Louie BE, Ganz RA, DeMeester TR (2014) Safety analysis of first 1000 patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dis Esophagus (Epub ahead of print)

  2. 2.

    Feussner H, Horvath OP, Siewert JR (1992) Vicryl-scarf-induced scarring around esophagogastric junction as treatment of esophageal reflux disease. An experimental study in the dog. Dig Dis Sci 37(6):875–881

  3. 3.

    Siewert JR, Feussner H (1988) The Angelchik prosthesis—intermediate term evaluation and results. Z Gastroenterol 26(8):421–429

  4. 4.

    Bonavina L, DeMeester T, Fockens P, Dunn D, Saino G, Bona D et al (2010) Laparoscopic sphincter augmentation device eliminates reflux symptoms and normalizes esophageal acid exposure: one- and 2-year results of a feasibility trial. Ann Surg 252:857–862

  5. 5.

    Lipham JC, DeMeester TR, Ganz RA, Bonavina L, Saino G, Dunn DH, Fockens P, Bemelman W (2012) The LINX® reflux management system: confirmed safety and efficacy now at 4 years. Surg Endosc 26:2944–2949

  6. 6.

    Bonavina L, DeMeester T, Mason R, Stein HJ, Feussner H, Evander A (1997) Mechanical effect of the Angelchik prosthesis on the competency of the gastric cardia: pathophysiologic implications and surgical perspectives. Dis Esophagus 10(2):115–118

  7. 7.

    Bonavina L, Saino G, Lipham JC, DeMeester TR (2013) LINX® Reflux Management System in chronic gastroesophageal reflux: a novel effective technology for restoring the natural barrier to reflux: a novel effective technology for restoring the natural barrier to reflux. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 6(4):261–268

  8. 8.

    Ganz RA, Peters JH, Horgan S, Bernelman WA, Dunst CM, Edmundowicz SA, Lipham JC, Luketich JD, Melvin WS, Oelschlager BK, Schlack-Haerer SCJ, Smith CD, Smith CC, Dunn D, Taiganides PA (2013) Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease. N Engl J Med 368(8):719–727

Download references

Disclosures

Dr M. Bauer, Prof Dr A. Meining, Dr M. Kranzfelder, A. Jell, Dr R. Schirren, PD Dr D. Wilhelm, Prof Dr H. Friess and Prof Dr H. Feussner have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Correspondence to Margit Bauer.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 10926 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 10926 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bauer, M., Meining, A., Kranzfelder, M. et al. Endoluminal perforation of a magnetic antireflux device. Surg Endosc 29, 3806–3810 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4145-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Antireflux device
  • LINX®
  • Interventional endoscopy
  • Erosion