Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 29, Issue 7, pp 1795–1803 | Cite as

Relaparoscopy for management of postoperative complications following colorectal surgery: ten years experience in a single center

  • Diego Cuccurullo
  • Felice Pirozzi
  • Antonio Sciuto
  • Umberto Bracale
  • Camillo La Barbera
  • Francesco Galante
  • Francesco CorcioneEmail author
Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopy has increasingly become the standard of care for patients who undergo colorectal surgery for both benign and malignant disease. On the basis of this growing experience, there is now an expanded role for laparoscopic approach to postoperative complications after primary colorectal resection. However, there is little literature specific to this topic. We report a ten-year experience with laparoscopic treatment of early complications following laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Methods

From January 2003 to December 2012, a total of 1,292 patients underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery in our department. One hundred and two (7.9 %) patients required reoperation for a postoperative complication. Laparoscopy has been also adopted as the preferred procedure for management of postoperative complications. A retrospective review of 84 patients who had relaparoscopy (RL) for postoperative complications, including peritonitis, ureteral injury, bowel obstruction, and bleeding, was performed.

Results

Reoperation was carried out laparoscopically in 79 (94.0 %) patients. Five (6.0 %) conversions were necessary because of massive colonic ischemia, generalized fecal peritonitis, and lack of working space. The most common finding at RL was anastomotic leakage (57.1 %) that was managed by peritoneal lavage and ileostomy in 91.7 % of cases. Six percent of patients had negative RL. Overall morbidity rate was 25.0 %. Five patients required additional surgery: four (5.1 %) after RL and one after a converted procedure. There were five (6.0 %) deaths from septic shock, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolism.

Conclusions

Laparoscopy is a safe and effective tool for management of complications following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. In this setting, RL represents the first step of re-exploration and treatment, with no delay to conversion to open procedure even in skilled laparoscopic hands.

Keywords

Relaparoscopy Colorectal Complications Leakage Small bowel obstruction Postoperative 

Notes

Disclosures

Drs. D. Cuccurullo, F. Pirozzi, A. Sciuto, U. Bracale, C. La Barbera, F. Galante, and Prof. F. Corcione have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Liska D, Lee SW, Nandakumar G (2012) Laparoscopic surgery for benign and malignant colorectal diseases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:165–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH, Sietses C, van der Peet DL, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Bonjer HJ, Bemelman WA, Cuesta MA (2012) Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 255:216–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L, Smith M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2004) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 18:281–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group (2013) (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Corcione F, Bracale U, Barra L, Pirozzi F, Cuccurullo D, Andreoli F (2013) Standardization of laparoscopic left hemicolectomy: a single-center experience of 484 cases. Minerva Chir 68:513–521PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mamidanna R, Burns EM, Bottle A, Aylin P, Stonell C, Hanna GB, Faiz O (2012) Reduced risk of medical morbidity and mortality in patients selected for laparoscopic colorectal resection in England: a population-based study. Arch Surg 147:219–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shapiro R, Vogel JD, Kiran RP (2011) Risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: an additional benefit of the minimally invasive approach? Dis Colon Rectum 54:1496–1502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Ishiguro S, Akasu T, Moriya Y (2008) Wound infection after a laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Surg Today 38:618–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laporte M, Rotholtz NA (2013) Reoperative surgery after a primary laparoscopic approach. In: Zbar AP, Madoff RD, Wexner S (eds) Reconstructive surgery of the rectum, anus and perineum. Springer, London, pp 55–161Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Corcione F, Cuccurullo D, Pirozzi F, Sciuto A, La Barbera C, Mandalà S (2012) The role of laparoscopy in emergency treatment of complications after laparoscopic and endoscopic procedures. In: Mandalà V (ed) The role of laparoscopy in emergency abdominal surgery. Springer, Milan, pp 175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rotholtz NA, Laporte M, Lencinas SM, Bun ME, Aued ML, Mezzadri NA (2009) Is a laparoscopic approach useful for treating complications after primary laparoscopiccolorectal surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 52:275–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Riordan JM, Larkin JO, Mehigan BJ, McCormick PH (2013) Re-laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of postoperative complications following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgeon 11:183–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bracale U, Pignata G, Lirici MM, Hüscher CG, Pugliese R, Sgroi G, Romano G, Spinoglio G, Gualtierotti M, Maglione V, Azagra S, Kanehira E, Kim JG, Song KY, Guideline Committee Of The Italian Society Of Hospital Surgeons-ACOI and Italian Hi-Tech Surgical Club-IHTSC (2012) Laparoscopic gastrectomies for cancer: the ACOI-IHTSC national guidelines. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 21:313–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Azioni G, Bracale U, Scala A, Capobianco F, Barone M, Rosati M, Pignata G (2010) Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy and vesicopsoas hitch for infiltrative ureteral endometriosis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19:292–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Corcione F, Pirozzi F, Aragiusto G, Galante F, Sciuto A (2012) Laparoscopic splenectomy: experience of a single center in a series of 300 cases. Surg Endosc 26:2870–2876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arnell TD (2006) Minimally invasive reoperation following laparotomy. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 19:223–227PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosin D, Zmora O, Khaikin M, Bar Zakai B, Ayalon A, Shabtai M (2004) Laparoscopic management of surgical complications after a recent laparotomy. Surg Endosc 18:994–996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kirshtein B, Domchik S, Mizrahi S, Lantsberg L (2009) Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of postoperative complications. Am J Surg 197:19–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebaur E, Bergamaschi R, Bonier HJ, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi Ch, Jansen FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121–1143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Domchik S, Mizrahi S, Lantsberg L (2008) Early relaparoscopy for management of suspected postoperative complications. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1257–1262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sauerland S, Agresta F, Bergamaschi R, Borzellino G, Budzynski A, Champault G, Fingerhut A, Isla A, Johansson M, Lundorff P, Navez B, Saad S, Neugebauer EA (2006) Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 20:14–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dexter SP, Miller GV, Davides D, Martin IG, Sue Ling HM, Sagar PM, Larvin M, McMahon MJ (2000) Relaparoscopy for the detection and treatment of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 179:316–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yau P, Watson DI, Devitt PG, Game PA, Jamieson GG (2000) Early reoperation following laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Am J Surg 179:172–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Calmes JM, Giusti V, Suter M (2005) Reoperative laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an experience with 49 cases. Obes Surg 15:316–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ten Broek RP, Van Goor H (2008) Laparoscopic reintervention in colorectal surgery. Minerva Chir 63:161–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kwak JM, Kim SH, Son DN, Kim J, Lee SI, Min BW, Um JW, Moon HY (2011) The role of laparoscopic approach for anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:29–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wind J, Koopman AG, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Slors JF, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2007) Laparoscopic reintervention for anastomotic leakage after primary laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94:1562–1566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vennix S, Abegg R, Bakker OJ, van den Boezem PB, Brokelman WJ, Sietses C, Bosscha K, Lips DJ, Prins HA (2013) Surgical re-interventions following colorectal surgery: open versus laparoscopic management of anastomotic leakage. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:739–744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Joh YG, Kim SH, Hahn KY, Stulberg J, Chung CS, Lee DK (2009) Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic protectomy can be managed by a minimally invasive approach. Dis Colon Rectum 52:91–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pera M, Delgado S, García-Valdecasas JC, Pera M, Castells A, Piqué JM, Bombuy E, Lacy AM (2002) The management of leaking rectal anastomoses by minimally invasive techniques. Surg Endosc 16:603–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Matsuoka H, Mori T, Masaki T, Kobayashi T, Aoki H, Hashimoto Y, Tokutsu T, Sugiyama M (2011) Laparoscopic drainage for fecal peritonitis following anastomotic leak. Report of a case. http://www.sages.org/meetings/annual-meeting/abstracts-archive/laparoscopic-drainage-for-fecal-peritonitis-following-anastomotic-leak-report-of-a-case/
  36. 36.
    Agresta F, Ciardo LF, Mazzarolo G, Michelet I, Orsi G, Trentin G, Bedin N (2006) Peritonitis: laparoscopic approach. World J Emerg Surg 1:9PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Horattas MC, Haller N, Ricchiuti D (2003) Increased transperitoneal bacterial translocation in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 17:1464–1467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ozmen MM, Cöl C, Aksoy AM, Tekeli FA, Berberoglu M (1999) Effect of CO(2) insufflation on bacteremia and bacterial translocation in an animal model of peritonitis. Surg Endosc 13:801–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Are C, Talamini MA, Murata K, De Maio A (2002) Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum alters acute-phase response induced by lipopolysaccharide. Surg Endosc 16:1464–1467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Montalto AS, Bitto A, Irrera N, Polito F, Rinaldi M, Antonuccio P, Impellizzeri P, Altavilla D, Squadrito F, Romeo C (2012) CO2 pneumoperitoneum impact on early liver and lung cytokine expression in a rat model of abdominal sepsis. Surg Endosc 26:984–989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Poves I, Sebastián Valverde E, Puig Companyó S, Dorcaratto D, Membrilla E, Pons MJ, Grande L (2013) Results of a laparoscopic approach for the treatment of acute small bowel obstruction due to adhesions and internal hernias. Cir Esp. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.05.008
  42. 42.
    Zerey M, Sechrist CW, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Matthews BD, Heniford BT (2007) Laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction. Am Surg 73:773–778PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Li MZ, Lian L, Xiao LB, Wu WH, He YL, Song XM (2012) Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 204:779–786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    McCormick JT, Simmang CL (2006) Reoperation following minimally invasive surgery: are the “rules” different? Clin Colon Rectal Surg 19:217–222PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diego Cuccurullo
    • 1
  • Felice Pirozzi
    • 1
  • Antonio Sciuto
    • 1
  • Umberto Bracale
    • 2
  • Camillo La Barbera
    • 1
  • Francesco Galante
    • 1
  • Francesco Corcione
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery“Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli” – Monaldi HospitalNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Surgical Specialities and NephrologyUniversity “Federico II” of NaplesNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations