Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 931–936 | Cite as

Laparoscopic versus open reintervention for anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive colorectal surgery

  • Chul Min Lee
  • Jung Wook Huh
  • Seong Hyeon Yun
  • Hee Cheol Kim
  • Woo Yong Lee
  • Yoon Ah Park
  • Yong Beom Cho
  • Ho-Kyung Chun
Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic reintervention compared with open surgery in patients with anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

Methods

Between January 2008 and December 2012, 77 patients who required surgical reintervention for anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive colorectal surgery were included in this study. Data on the patients’ demographics, operative management, morbidity, hospital stay, and mortality were analyzed for differences based on whether they received laparoscopic or open surgery.

Results

Sixteen patients underwent open surgery following laparoscopy, and 61 patients received laparoscopic reintervention following laparoscopy. The conversion rate was 8.2 % (5/61). The median total hospital stay following reintervention was significantly shorter for laparoscopic surgery (16.0 days, range 9–117 days) than for open surgery (35.5 days, range 10–135 days, p < 0.001). The postoperative 30-day morbidity rate, including wound dehiscence (25.0 vs 3.3 %, p = 0.015) and intra-abdominal infection (31.3 vs 6.6 %, p = 0.016), was lower in the laparoscopic surgery group than in the open surgery group. The rate of stoma closure was lower in the open surgery group than in the laparoscopic surgery group (43.8 vs 80.5 %, p < 0.001). There was one in-hospital mortality in the open surgery group.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic reintervention for anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive colorectal surgery is associated with a shorter hospital stay, fewer postoperative complications, and a higher stoma closure rate than open surgery. Laparoscopic reintervention for anastomotic leakage is feasible and safe.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Leakage Open surgery Colorectal surgery 

Notes

Disclosures

Chul Min Lee, Jung Wook Huh, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee, Yoon Ah Park, Yong Beom Cho, and Ho-Kyung Chun declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG (2001) Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 88:1157–1168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO, Nguyen V, Pigazzi A, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ (2013) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surg 148:65–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krarup PM, Jorgensen LN, Andreasen AH, Harling H (2012) A nationwide study on anastomotic leakage after colonic cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:e661–e667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ, Sinclair G, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, Bokey EL (2003) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90:1261–1266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Junginger T, Gonner U, Trinh TT, Lollert A, Oberholzer K, Berres M (2010) Permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1632–1639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krarup PM, Nordholm-Carstensen A, Jorgensen LN, Harling H (2013) Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Surg 259(5):930–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kennedy GD, Heise C, Rajamanickam V, Harms B, Foley EF (2009) Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complication rates after abdominal colectomy: results from the national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg 249:596–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poon JT, Law WL, Wong IW, Ching PT, Wong LM, Fan JK, Lo OS (2009) Impact of laparoscopic colorectal resection on surgical site infection. Ann Surg 249:77–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD003145Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Newman CM, Arnold SJ, Coull DB, Linn TY, Moran BJ, Gudgeon AM, Cecil TD (2012) The majority of colorectal resections require an open approach, even in units with a special interest in laparoscopic surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:29–34 discussion 42–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Agresta F, De Simone P, Bedin N (2004) The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: a single-center 10-year experience. JSLS 8:25–30PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agresta F, Mazzarolo G, Ciardo LF, Bedin N (2008) The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: has the attitude changed? A single-center review of a 15-year experience. Surg Endosc 22:1255–1262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Champagne B, Stulberg JJ, Fan Z, Delaney CP (2009) The feasibility of laparoscopic colectomy in urgent and emergent settings. Surg Endosc 23:1791–1796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Navez B, Tassetti V, Scohy JJ, Mutter D, Guiot P, Evrard S, Marescaux J (1998) Laparoscopic management of acute peritonitis. Br J Surg 85:32–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diebel LN, Dulchavsky SA, Wilson RF (1992) Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure on mesenteric arterial and intestinal mucosal blood flow. J Trauma 33:45–48 discussion 48–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maddaus MA, Ahrenholz D, Simmons RL (1988) The biology of peritonitis and implications for treatment. Surg Clin North Am 68:431–443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gurtner GC, Robertson CS, Chung SC, Ling TK, Ip SM, Li AK (1995) Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on bacteraemia and endotoxaemia in an animal model of peritonitis. Br J Surg 82:844–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Champault GGP, Cruaud P, Taffinder N (1994) Modifications of bacteria vitality due to CO2 used during endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 8:971Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wind J, Koopman AG, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Slors JF, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2007) Laparoscopic reintervention for anastomotic leakage after primary laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94:1562–1566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gupta A, Watson DI (2001) Effect of laparoscopy on immune function. Br J Surg 88:1296–1306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Novitsky YW, Litwin DE, Callery MP (2004) The net immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:1411–1419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lim SW, Kim HJ, Kim CH, Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2013) Risk factors for permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:259–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosin D, Zmora O, Khaikin M, Bar Zakai B, Ayalon A, Shabtai M (2004) Laparoscopic management of surgical complications after a recent laparotomy. Surg Endosc 18:994–996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Riordan JM, Larkin JO, Mehigan BJ, McCormick PH (2013) Re-laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of postoperative complications following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surgeon 11:183–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vennix S, Abegg R, Bakker OJ, van den Boezem PB, Brokelman WJ, Sietses C, Bosscha K, Lips DJ, Prins HA (2013) Surgical re-interventions following colorectal surgery: open versus laparoscopic management of anastomotic leakage. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:739–744CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chul Min Lee
    • 1
  • Jung Wook Huh
    • 1
  • Seong Hyeon Yun
    • 1
  • Hee Cheol Kim
    • 1
  • Woo Yong Lee
    • 1
  • Yoon Ah Park
    • 1
  • Yong Beom Cho
    • 1
  • Ho-Kyung Chun
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung HospitalSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations