Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 737–746 | Cite as

On the suitability of Thiel cadavers for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): surgical training, feasibility studies, and anatomical education

  • Andrea Porzionato
  • Lino Polese
  • Emanuele Lezoche
  • Veronica Macchi
  • Giovanni Lezoche
  • Gianfranco Da Dalt
  • Carla Stecco
  • Lorenzo Norberto
  • Stefano Merigliano
  • Raffaele De CaroEmail author
Dynamic Manuscript



Surgical training in virtual, animal and cadaver models is essential for minimally invasive surgery. Thiel cadavers are suitable for laparoscopy, but there are few data about the use of embalmed (Tutsch method) and slightly embalmed (Thiel method) cadavers in procedures of Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES), which are usually developed and learned on swine models and fresh frozen cadavers. The aim of this study was thus to assess the use of these cadavers for NOTES approaches.


The following surgical procedures were evaluated: transanal total mesorectal excision (four cadavers: one Tutsch, two Thiel, one fresh frozen), transanal ileorectal bypass (five cadavers: one Tutsch, three Thiel, one fresh frozen), and transvaginal appendectomy (two Tutsch cadaver).


The Thiel method ensured tissue flexibility and consistency suitable for performing the above surgical procedures with good results and without complications, with only a small increase in rigidity with respect to fresh specimens. Cadavers embalmed with higher formalin concentrations (Tutsch method) were more difficult to use, due to high tissue rigidity and resistance of the abdominal wall to pneumoperitoneum, although NOTES accesses were possible.


Thiel cadavers are suitable for transanal/transrectal and transvaginal NOTES approaches, for training surgical residents/specialists and also for surgical research. In minimally invasive surgery (and particularly in NOTES), integration between cadaver (fresh frozen and/or Thiel) and animal models would represent the gold standard, allowing guaranteed knowledge of and respect for human surgical anatomy and correct management of surgery on living subjects. NOTES approaches to human cadavers may also be proposed for the anatomical education of medical students.


Human cadaver model Transanal endoscopic microsurgery Thiel method Surgical training Body donation Total mesorectal excision 



The authors are grateful to Anna Rambaldo, Gloria Sarasin and Maria Martina Sfriso for skillful technical assistance in the management of cadavers. The authors also acknowledge Matteo Della Pittima and Giulia Andretta for their help in the preparation of the videos.


Andrea Porzionato, Lino Polese, Emanuele Lezoche, Veronica Macchi, Giovanni Lezoche, Gianfranco Da Dalt, Carla Stecco, Lorenzo Norberto, Stefano Merigliano, Raffaele De Caro have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplemental Material 1: Video of transanal total mesorectal excision (00:00-00:30) and transanal ileoproctostomy (00:30-01:00) performed in female fresh frozen cadavers for comparison with preserved cadavers. Transanal total mesorectal excision: rectal wall is cut with forceps and scissors; dissection continues posteriorly along the avascular plane. Transanal ileoproctostomy: suture is begun between rectal wall and an ileal loop pulled into rectum. (WMV 22213 kb)

Supplemental Material 2: Video of transanal total mesorectal excision performed in male Thiel cadaver. Rectal wall is cut with forceps and scissors and dissection continues circumferentially (00:00-00:20). On posterior aspect of rectum, dissection continues cranially along avascular plane between parietal presacral fascia and visceral perirectal fascia, including so-called mesorectum in resection (00:20-00:28). Dissection continues along lateral and anterior rectal walls (00:28-00:47). Peritoneum is opened anteriorly to rectum at level of its reflection and abdominal cavity becomes visible (00:47-00:57). In this video, the preservation of realistic colours and consistence of the dissected tissues is appreciable. (WMV 22830 kb)

Supplemental Material 3: Video of ileoproctostomy through transanal route performed in male Thiel cadaver. Anterior rectal wall is cut with scissors cranially to peritoneal reflection (00:00-00:16). Peritoneoscopy is performed through rectal opening in order to identify an ileal loop to be grasped with retrieval forceps and pulled into rectum (00:16-00:29). Note the flexibility and mobility of the ileal loop. Suture is performed between ileum and rectum (00:29-00:48). The preservation characteristics of the tissues provide realistic sensations during the suture. After opening of ileal wall, ileorectal bypass is finally verified passing from rectum to ileal loop (00:48-00:54). (WMV 19674 kb)

Supplemental Material 4: Video of appendectomy through transvaginal route performed in female Tutsch cadaver. Access through the posterior fornix of the vagina is produced with open technique (00:00-00:13). Examination of the abdominal cavity through transvaginal route (00:14-00:56). Intestinal loops show darker and less realistic colours, together with reduced flexibility and mobility. (WMV 14268 kb)


  1. 1.
    Telem DA, Han KS, Kim MC, Ajari I, Sohn DK, Woods K, Kapur V, Sbeih MA, Perretta S, Rattner DW, Sylla P (2013) Transanal rectosigmoid resection via natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) with total mesorectal excision in a large human cadaver series. Surg Endosc 27:74–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Denk PM, Swanström LL, Whiteford MH (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgical platform for natural orifice surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 68:954–959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whiteford MH, Denk PM, Swanström LL (2007) Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 21:1870–1874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feussner H, Fiolka A, Schneider A, Gillen S, Kranzfelder M, Friess H, Wilhelm D (2011) Safe sigmoid access for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Colorectal Dis 13(Suppl 7):55–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Santos BF, Hungness ES, Boller AM (2011) Development of a feasible transrectal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES®) approach in a cadaveric appendectomy model: anterior is better. Surg Endosc 25:3773–3783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rieder E, Spaun GO, Khajanchee YS, Martinec DV, Arnold BN, Smith Sehdev AE, Swanstrom LL, Whiteford MH (2011) A natural orifice transrectal approach for oncologic resection of the rectosigmoid: an experimental study and comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 25:3357–3363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moran EA, Bingener J, Murad F, Levy MJ, Gostout CJ (2011) The challenges with NOTES retroperitoneal access in humans. Surg Endosc 25:1096–1100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eyraud R, Laydner H, Autorino R, Hillyer S, Long JA, Panumatrassamee K, Khalifeh A, Stein RJ, Haber GP, Kaouk JH (2013) Robot-assisted transrectal hybrid natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery nephrectomy and adrenalectomy: initial investigation in a cadaver model. Urology 81:1090–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bazzi WM, Stroup SP, Cohen SA, Dotai T, Kopp RP, Colangelo C, Raheem OA, Ramamoorthy S, Talamini M, Horgan S, Kane CJ, Derweesh IH (2012) Feasibility of transrectal hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) nephrectomy in the cadaveric model. Urology 80:590–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elmunzer BJ, Sonnenday CJ, Taylor JR, Furlan JP, Schomisch SJ, Scheiman JM, Chak A, Marks JM, Ponsky JL (2011) Endoscopic access to and exploration of the lesser sac in a human cadaver model: opportunity for transgastric endoscopic pancreatic surgery (with video). Surg Endosc 25:2725–2730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eisenberg D, Storne E, Belson A (2010) Use of a flexible robotic transgastric natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) platform in a cadaver to test access, navigation, maneuverability, and stability. Surg Endosc 24:2323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Swanström L, Swain P, Denk P (2009) Development and validation of a new generation of flexible endoscope for NOTES. Surg Innov 16:104–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Azagury DE, Ryou M, Shaikh SN, San José Estépar R, Lengyel BI, Jagadeesan J, Vosburgh KG, Thompson CC (2012) Real-time computed tomography-based augmented reality for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery navigation. Br J Surg 99:1246–1253PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laydner H, Autorino R, Isac W, Khalifeh A, Panumatrassamee K, Kassab A, Long JA, Eyraud R, Rizkala E, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH (2013) Robotic retroperitoneal transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) nephrectomy: feasibility study in a cadaver model. Urology 81:1232–1237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aron M, Berger AK, Stein RJ, Kamoi K, Brandina R, Canes D, Sotelo R, Desai MM, Gill IS (2009) Transvaginal nephrectomy with a multichannel laparoscopic port: a cadaver study. BJU Int 103:1537–1541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perretta S, Allemann P, Asakuma M, Cahill R, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J (2009) Feasibility of right and left transvaginal retroperitoneal nephrectomy: from the porcine to the cadaver model. J Endourol 23:1887–1892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perretta S, Allemann P, Asakuma M, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J (2009) Adrenalectomy using natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a transvaginal retroperitoneal approach. Surg Endosc 23:1390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Allemann P, Perretta S, Marescaux J (2009) Surgical access to the adrenal gland: the quest for a “no visible scar” approach. Surg Oncol 18:131–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sugimoto M, Yasuda H, Koda K, Suzuki M, Yamazaki M, Tezuka T, Kosugi C, Higuchi R, Watayo Y, Yagawa Y, Uemura S, Tsuchiya H, Hirano A, Ro S (2009) Evaluation for transvaginal and transgastric NOTES cholecystectomy in human and animal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:255–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Madan AK, Tichansky DS, Khan KA (2008) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic gastric bypass performed in a cadaver. Obes Surg 18:1192–1199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hagen ME, Wagner OJ, Swain P, Pugin F, Buchs N, Caddedu M, Jamidar P, Fasel J, Morel P (2008) Hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an experimental surgical study in human cadavers. Endoscopy 40:918–924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hagen ME, Wagner OJ, Inan I, Morel P, Fasel J, Jacobsen G, Spivack A, Thompson K, Wong B, Fischer L, Talamini M, Horgan S (2010) Robotic single-incision transabdominal and transvaginal surgery: initial experience with intersecting robotic arms. Int J Med Robot 6:251–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Branco F, Pini G, Osório L, Cavadas V, Versos R, Gomes M, Autorino R, Correia-Pinto J, Lima E (2011) Transvesical peritoneoscopy with rigid scope: feasibility study in human male cadaver. Surg Endosc 25:2015–2019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Humphreys MR, Krambeck AE, Andrews PE, Castle EP, Lingeman JE (2009) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgical radical prostatectomy: proof of concept. J Endourol 23:669–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Giger U, Frésard I, Häfliger A, Bergmann M, Krähenbühl L (2008) Laparoscopic training on Thiel human cadavers: a model to teach advanced laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 22:901–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pattanshetti VM, Pattanshetti SV (2010) Laparoscopic surgery on cadavers: a novel teaching tool for surgical residents. ANZ J Surg 80:676–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rai BP, Tang B, Eisma R, Soames RW, Wen H, Nabi G (2012) A qualitative assessment of human cadavers embalmed by Thiel’s method used in laparoscopic training for renal resection. Anat Sci Educ 5:182–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fitzpatrick CM, Kolesari GL, Brasel KJ (2001) Teaching anatomy with surgeons’ tools: use of the laparoscope in clinical anatomy. Clin Anat 14:349–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Glasgow SC, Tiemann D, Frisella MM, Conroy G, Klingensmith ME (2006) Laparoscopy as an educational and recruiting tool. Am J Surg 191:542–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jiménez AM, Aguilar JF (2009) Laparoscopy: learning a new surgical anatomy? Anat Sci Educ 2:81–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Porzionato A, Macchi V, Stecco C, Mazzi A, Rambaldo A, Sarasin G, Parenti A, Scipioni A, De Caro R (2012) Quality management of Body Donation Program at the University of Padova. Anat Sci Educ 5:264–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    De Caro R, Macchi V, Porzionato A (2009) Promotion of body donation and use of cadavers in anatomical education at the University of Padova. Anat Sci Educ 2:91–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Riederer BM, Bolt S, Brenner E, Bueno-Lopez JL, Circulescu ARM, Davies DC, De Caro R, Gerrits PO, McHanwell S, Pais D, Paulsen F, Plaisant O, Sendemir E, Stabile I, Moxham BJ (2012) The legal and ethical framework governing Body Donation in Europe: 1st update on current practice. Eur J Anat 16:1–21Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tutsch H (1975) An odorless, well-preserving injectable solution for cadavers used in classes. Anat Anz 138:126–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Thiel W (1992) The preservation of the whole corpse with natural color. Ann Anat 174:185–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thiel W (2002) Supplement to the conservation of an entire cadaver according to W. Thiel. Ann Anat 184:267–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lloyd GM, Maxwell-Armstrong C, Acheson AG (2011) Fresh frozen cadavers: an under-utilized resource in laparoscopic colorectal training in the United Kingdom. Colorectal Dis 13:e303–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP (2012) Simulation-based training and learning curves in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Br J Surg 99:887–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kang PS, Horgan AF, Acheson AG (2009) Laparoscopic surgery training. Try fresh frozen cadavers. BMJ 338:b2426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Groscurth P, Eggli P, Kapfhammer J, Rager G, Hornung JP, Fasel JD (2001) Gross anatomy in the surgical curriculum in Switzerland: improved cadaver preservation, anatomical models, and course development. Anat Rec 265:254–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Herbella FA, Del Grande JC (2001) Human cadavers as an experimental model for esophageal surgery. Dis Esophagus 14:218–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mourad M, Bertin D, Gigot JF, Squifflet JP (1994) Laparoscopic treatment of lymphoceles following kidney transplantation by intraperitoneal fenestration and omentoplasty. Surg Endosc 8:1427–1430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Decanini C, Milsom JW, Böhm B, Fazio VW (1994) Laparoscopic oncologic abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 37:552–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Milsom JW, Böhm B, Decanini C, Fazio VW (1994) Laparoscopic oncologic proctosigmoidectomy with low colorectal anastomosis in a cadaver model. Surg Endosc 8:1117–1123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Prémont M, Clotteau JE (1994–1995) De la utilisation des cadavres pour l’enseignement de la coelio-chirurgie. Chirurgie 120:33Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bruns C, Wolfgarten B, Walter M, Pichlmaier H, Koebke J (1996) Gasless videoendoscopic implantation of an aortobifemoral vascular prosthesis via a transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach: an experimental study. J Endovasc Surg 3:290–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gonzalez-Supery M, Sainz R (1996) Entrenamiento anatomico para la nefrectomia laparoscopica. Rev Arg Urol 61:175–179Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nebot-Cegarra J, Macarulla-Sanz E (2004) Improving laparoscopy in embalmed cadavers: a new method with a lateral abdominal wall muscle section. Surg Endosc 18:1058–1062PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ramamoorthy SL, Fischer LJ, Jacobsen G, Thompson K, Wong B, Spivack A, Cullen J, Talamini MA, Horgan S (2009) Transrectal endoscopic retrorectal access (TERA): a novel NOTES approach to the peritoneal cavity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:603–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM (2010) NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 24:1205–1210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Polese L, Angriman I, Mungo B, Luisetto R, Frego M, Merigliano S, Norberto L (2011) Ileorectal bypass performed entirely through a transanal route in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 25:3022–3027PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Porzionato
    • 1
  • Lino Polese
    • 2
  • Emanuele Lezoche
    • 3
  • Veronica Macchi
    • 1
  • Giovanni Lezoche
    • 4
  • Gianfranco Da Dalt
    • 2
  • Carla Stecco
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Norberto
    • 2
  • Stefano Merigliano
    • 2
  • Raffaele De Caro
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Section of Anatomy, Department of Molecular MedicineUniversity of PadovaPaduaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Surgery Oncology and GastroenterologyUniversity of PadovaPaduaItaly
  3. 3.Department of General Surgery, Surgical Specialities and Organ Transplantation Paride StefaniniUniversity of RomeRomeItaly
  4. 4.Department of Experimental and Clinical MedicinePolytechnic University of MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations