Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 334–348 | Cite as

Laparoscopy for rectal cancer is oncologically adequate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

  • Alberto Arezzo
  • Roberto Passera
  • Alessandro Salvai
  • Simone Arolfo
  • Marco Ettore Allaix
  • Guido Schwarzer
  • Mario Morino
Review

Abstract

Background

This review of cancer outcomes is based on key literature searches of the medical databases and meta-analysis of short-term benefits of laparoscopy in rectal cancer treatment.

Methods

We carried out a systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and prospective non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) published between January 2000 and September 2013 listed in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42013005076). The primary endpoint was clearance of the circumferential resection margin. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model, and sensitivity analysis by a random-effect model; subgroup analysis was performed on subsets of patients with extraperitoneal cancer of the rectum. Relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) were used as outcome measures.

Results

Twenty-seven studies (10,861 patients) met the inclusion criteria; eight were RCTs (2,659 patients). The RCTs reported involvement of the circumferential margin in 7.9 % of patients who underwent laparoscopic and in 6.9 % of those undergoing open surgery; the overall RR was 1.00 (95 % confidence interval 0.73–1.35) with no heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis of patients with extraperitoneal cancer showed equivalent involvement of the circumferential margin in the two treatment groups. Although significantly more lymph nodes were retrieved in the surgical specimen after open surgery, the MD of −0.56 was of marginal clinical significance. The sensitivity and subgroup analyses revealed no other significant differences between laparoscopic and open surgery in the rate of R0 resections, distal margin clearance, mesorectal fascia integrity, or local recurrence at 5 years.

Conclusions

Based on the evidence from RCTs and non-RCTs, the short-term benefit and oncological adequacy of laparoscopic rectal resection appear to be equivalent to open surgery, with some evidence potentially pointing to comparable long-term outcomes and oncological adequacy in selected patients with primary resectable rectal cancer.

Keywords

Rectal cancer Rectal neoplasms Laparoscopy Meta-analysis Systematic review 

Notes

Disclosure

Alberto Arezzo, Roberto Passera, Alessandro Salvai, Simone Arolfo, Marco Ettore Allaix, Guido Schwarzer, and Mario Morino have no conflict of interests or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, Sexton R, MacFarlane JK (1998) Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997. Arch Surg 133:894–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ries LA, Wingo PA, Miller DS et al (2000) The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer. Cancer 88:2398–2424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arezzo A, Passera R, Scozzari G, Verra M, Morino M (2013) Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27:1485–1502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arezzo A, Passera R, Scozzari G, Verra M, Morino M (2013) Laparoscopy for extraperitoneal rectal cancer reduces short-term morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J 1:32–47PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Colon cancer laparoscopic or open resection study group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 151:65–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed 1 Jan 2012
  12. 12.
    Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schwarzer G (2007) Meta: an R package for meta-analysis. R News 7:40–45Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu WX, Sun YM, Hua YB et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus conventional open resection of rectal carcinoma: a clinical comparative study. World J Gastroenterol 10:1167–1170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Breukink SO, Pierie JP, Grond AJ et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision: a case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 20:428–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morino M, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Corno F, Garrone C (2005) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 19:1460–1467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Veenhof AA, Engel AF, Craanen ME et al (2007) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision: a comparative study on short-term outcomes. A single-institution experience regarding anterior resections and abdominoperineal resections. Dig Surg 24:367–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khaikin M, Bashankaev B, Person B et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open proctectomy for rectal cancer: patients’ outcome and oncologic adequacy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:118–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liang X, Hou S, Liu H, Li Y, Jiang B, Bai W, Li G, Wang W, Feng Y, Guo J (2011) Effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic resection versus open surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a randomised, controlled trial from China. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:381–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wütrich P et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg 250:54–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lujan J, Valero G, Hernandez Q et al (2009) Randomised clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:982–989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koulas SG, Pappas-Gogos G, Spirou S (2009) Evaluations of laparoscopic proctocolectomy versus traditional technique in patients with rectal cancer. JSLS 13:564–573PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY et al (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lau WY, Meng WC, Chung CC, Lai PB, Kwong KH (2000) Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 14:67–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Anthuber M, Fuerst A, Elser F, Berger R, Jauch KW (2003) Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1047–1053PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Law WL, Lee YM, Choi HK, Seto CL, Ho JW (2006) Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1108–1115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lelong B, Bege T, Esterni B, Guiramand J, Turrini O, Moutardier V, Magnin V, Monges G, Pernoud N, Blache JL, Giovannini M, Delpero JR (2007) Short-term outcome after laparoscopic or open restorative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 50:176–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Capretti G, Di Carlo V (2007) Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:464–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ströhlein MA, Grützner KU, Jauch KW, Heiss MM (2008) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open access surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 51:385–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Teoh AY, Leung WW (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 15:2418–2425. Erratum in: Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:229Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Baik SH, Gincherman M, Mutch MG, Birnbaum EH, Fleshman JW (2011) Laparoscopic versus open resection for patients with rectal cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival. Dis Colon Rectum 54:6–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    McKay GD, Morgan MJ, Wong SK, Gatenby AH, Fulham SB, Ahmed KW, Toh JW, Hanna M, Hitos K, South Western Sydney Colorectal Tumour Group (2012) Improved short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection for colon and rectal cancer in an area health service: a multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum 55:42–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kellokumpu IH, Kairaluoma MI, Nuorva KP, Kautiainen HJ, Jantunen IT (2012) Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting. Dis Colon Rectum 55:854–863PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lujan J, Valero G, Biondo S, Espin E, Parrilla P, Ortiz H (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients. Surg Endosc 27:295–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bretagnol F, Lelong B, Laurent C, Moutardier V, Rullier A, Monges G, Delpero JR, Rullier E (2005) The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 19:892–896PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Hon SS, Mak TW, Ngo DK, Leung WW, Leung KL (2013) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for mid and low rectal cancer: a prospective, randomised trial. Surg Endosc. 7 Sep 2013 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Seshadri RA, Srinivasan A, Tapkire R, Swaminathan R (2012) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a matched case-control study of short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 26:154–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jefferies MT, Evans MD, Hilton J, Chandrasekaran TV, Beynon J, Khot U (2012) Oncological outcome after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 14:967–971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L (1998) Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 17:2815–2834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Arezzo
    • 1
  • Roberto Passera
    • 2
  • Alessandro Salvai
    • 1
  • Simone Arolfo
    • 1
  • Marco Ettore Allaix
    • 1
  • Guido Schwarzer
    • 3
  • Mario Morino
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of TorinoTurinItaly
  2. 2.Division of Nuclear MedicineUniversity of TorinoTurinItaly
  3. 3.Institute of Medical Biometry and StatisticsUniversity Medical Center FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations