Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 230–235 | Cite as

Electrical stimulation to increase lower esophageal sphincter pressure after POEM

  • Franco Ciotola
  • Andres Ditaranto
  • Claudio Bilder
  • Adolfo Badaloni
  • Daniel Lowenstein
  • Juan Martin Riganti
  • Toshitaka Hoppo
  • Blair Jobe
  • Fabio Nachman
  • Alejandro Nieponice
New Technology

Abstract

Introduction

Postoperative reflux remains to be a challenge for patients with achalasia undergoing Heller myotomy. Similarly, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is gaining rapid acceptance but the impossibility of adding a fundoplication is questioned as the main pitfall to control reflux. Electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) has emerged as a new alternative for the treatment of reflux disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential benefits of combining electrical stimulation with endoscopic esophageal myotomy to prevent post procedural reflux.

Methods

Five pigs were subjected to POEM. After myotomy was completed, two electrical leads were implanted at the LES level and electrical stimulation was applied with the Endostim system with a regimen of 215 μs (5 mA amplitude), at 20 Hz for 25 min. LES pressures were recorded with manometry at pre and post-myotomy and after LES stimulation.

Results

Myotomy was completed successfully in all cases. Mean pre-myotomy LES pressure was 35.99 ± 8.08 mmHg. After myotomy, the LES pressure significantly dropped to 10.60 ± 3.24 mmHg (p = 0.03). Subsequent to LES-EST, LES pressure significantly increased to 21.74 ± 4.65 mmHg (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

The findings of this study show that LES-EST in healthy animals increases LES pressure after POEM procedure, and could be useful tool to minimize gastroesophageal reflux.

Keywords

POEM Electrical stimulation GERD Achalasia LES 

Notes

Disclosures

Dr Nieponice received a research Grant for parcial support of this study. Dr Jobe is a member of Endostim´s SAB. Franco Ciotola, Andres Ditaranto, Claudio Bilder, Adolfo Badaloni, Daniel Lowenstein, Juan Martin Riganti, Toshitaka Hoppo, and Fabio Nachman have no conflict of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Mayberry JF (2001) Epidemiology and demographics of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 11(2):235–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pohl D, Tutuian R (2007) Achalasia: an overview of diagnosis and treatment. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 16(3):297–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Booy JD et al (2012) The prevalence of autoimmune disease in patients with esophageal achalasia. Dis Esophagus 25(3):209–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kashiwagi H, Omura N (2011) Surgical treatment for achalasia: when should it be performed, and for which patients? Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 59(6):389–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosemurgy A et al (2005) Laparoscopic Heller myotomy provides durable relief from achalasia and salvages failures after botox or dilation. Ann Surg 241(5):725–733 discussion 733–5PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zaninotto G et al (2004) Botulinum toxin injection versus laparoscopic myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: economic analysis of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 18(4):691–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu L et al (2010) Functional analysis of long-term outcome after Heller’s myotomy for achalasia. Dis Esophagus 23(4):277–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patti MG, Herbella FA (2010) Fundoplication after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia: what type? J Gastrointest Surg 14(9):1453–1458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Inoue H et al (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42(4):265–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Swanstrom LL et al (2012) Long-term outcomes of an endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: the POEM procedure. Ann Surg 256(4):659–667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stavropoulos SN et al (2013) The international per oral endoscopic myotomy survey (IPOEMS): a snapshot of the global POEM experience. Surg Endosc 27(9):3322–3338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Von Renteln D et al (2013) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study. Gastroenterology. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.057 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Inoue H et al (2011) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: technique, indication, and outcomes. Thorac Surg Clin 21(4):519–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodriguez L et al (2013) Electrical stimulation therapy of the lower esophageal sphincter is successful in treating GERD: final results of open-label prospective trial. Surg Endosc 27(4):1083–1092PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rodriguez L et al (2012) Short-term electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter increases sphincter pressure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 24(5):446–450 e213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Payne WS (1989) Heller’s contribution to the surgical treatment of achalasia of the esophagus. 1914. Ann Thorac Surg 48(6):876–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hunter JG, Richardson WS (1997) Surgical management of achalasia. Surg Clin North Am 77(5):993–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cortes Gonzalez R, Villasenor Caloca R (1997) Esophageal cancer. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 62(3):149–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Campos GM et al (2009) Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 249(1):45–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Inoue H et al (2012) Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 109(5):728–731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bosing N et al (2003) Endoscopic ultrasound in routine clinical practice for staging adenocarcinomas of the stomach and distal esophagus. Chirurg 74(3):214–221 discussion 222–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Conio M et al (2003) Barrett’s esophagus: an update. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 46(2):187–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bello B et al (2012) Impact of minimally invasive surgery on the treatment of benign esophageal disorders. World J Gastroenterol 18(46):6764–6770PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mehta S, Hindmarsh A, Rhodes M (2005) Changes in functional gastrointestinal symptoms as a result of antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 19(11):1447–1450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Holloway RH et al (1986) Integrity of cholinergic innervation to the lower esophageal sphincter in achalasia. Gastroenterology 90(4):924–929PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kahrilas PJ, Boeckxstaens G (2013) The spectrum of achalasia: lessons from studies of pathophysiology and high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 145(5):954–965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franco Ciotola
    • 1
  • Andres Ditaranto
    • 1
  • Claudio Bilder
    • 1
  • Adolfo Badaloni
    • 1
  • Daniel Lowenstein
    • 1
  • Juan Martin Riganti
    • 1
  • Toshitaka Hoppo
    • 2
    • 3
  • Blair Jobe
    • 2
    • 3
  • Fabio Nachman
    • 1
  • Alejandro Nieponice
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Minimally Invasive Surgery ProgramFavaloro University HospitalBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.West Penn Allegheny Health SystemPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.McGowan InstituteUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations