Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 28, Issue 12, pp 3451–3457 | Cite as

An audit of short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in Finland

  • Anne Mattila
  • Jussi Luhtala
  • Johanna Mrena
  • Hannu Kautiainen
  • Ilmo Kellokumpu
Article

Abstract

Background and aim

To audit short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and factors influencing the success of the laparoscopic treatment.

Methods

From January 1999 to December 2011, 288 patients (93 males) underwent a single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with LCBDE in two Finnish Hospitals. Short-term outcome data were collected prospectively. Long-term outcomes were examined retrospectively. The main measures of outcome were the success of laparoscopic CBD stone clearance and recurrence of CBD stones in the long-term, with 30-day mortality, morbidity, and the length of postoperative hospital stay as secondary outcome measures.

Results

CBD stones were successfully removed by one-stage laparoscopic procedure in 232 of the 279 patients (83.2 %) with verified CBD stones and after conversion to open surgery in additional 28 patients (93.2 %). Nineteen patients (6.8 %) having residual stones after surgery were successfully treated with postoperative ERCP. On multivariate analysis, the independent factors associated with a failed laparoscopic stone clearance were stone size over 7 mm [OR 3.51 (95 % CI 1.53–8.03), p = 0.003], difficult anatomy [OR 18.01 (5.03–64.49), p < 0.001] and transcholedochal approach [OR 2.98 (1.37–4.47), p = 0.006]. Laparoscopic stone clearance also failed in all 11 patients having impacted stones at the ampulla of Vater. Cumulative long-term recurrence rate was 3.6 % at 5 years and 6.0 % at 10 years. Thirty-day mortality was 0.3 % and morbidity 12.2 %. Postoperative hospital stay was median 2 (IQR 1–3) days after transcystic CBD removal and 4 (IQR 3–7) days after transcholedochal CBD removal, p < 0.001.

Conclusion

Our results show that one-stage LC combined with LCBDE stone clearance is safe and effective in most patients thus reducing the number of additional, potentially dangerous endoscopic procedures. Moreover, large or impacted stones are a risk factor for failed stone clearance.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Bile duct stone Choledochoscopy 

Notes

Disclosures

A Mattila, J Luhtala, J Mrena, I Kellokumpu and H Kautiainen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Stiegmann GV, Goff JS, Mansour A, Pearlman N, Reveille RM, Norton L (1992) Precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography, and common duct exploration. Am J Surg 163:227–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hammarstrom LE, Holmin T, Stridbeck H, Ihse I (1995) Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized study of endoscopic versus surgical treatment of bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 82:1516–1521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kapoor R, Kaushik SP, Saraswat VA, Choudhuri G, Sikora SS, Saxena R, Kapoor VK (1996) Prospective randomized trial comparing endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by surgery with surgery alone in good risk patients with choledocholithiasis. HPB Surg 9:145–148PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Targarona EM, Ayuso RM, Bordas JM, Ros E, Pros I, Martinez J, Teres J, Trias M (1996) Randomised trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with gallbladder left in situ versus open surgery for common bileduct calculi in high-risk patients. Lancet 347:926–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suc B, Escat J, Cherqui D, Fourtanier G, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Millat B (1998) Surgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile duct stones: a multicenter randomized trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Arch Surg 133:702–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barwood NT, Valinsky LJ, Hobbs MS, Fletcher DR, Knuiman MW, Ridout SC (2002) Changing methods of imaging the common bile duct in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era in Western Australia: implications for surgical practice. Ann Surg 235:41–50PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub2 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, Diamond T, Taylor MA (2013) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD003327. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub3 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, Faggioni A, Ribeiro VM, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, Hanna GB (1999) EAES multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13:952–957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, Siperstein AE, Schecter WP, Campbell AR, Mackersie RC, Rodas A, Kreuwel HT, Harris HW (2010) Prospective randomized trial of LC + LCBDE vs ERCP/S + LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg 145:28–33. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.226 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T, Norton S, Thompson M (2009) A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:713–720. doi:10.1089/lap.2008.0428 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nathanson LK, O’Rourke NA, Martin IJ, Fielding GA, Cowen AE, Roberts RK, Kendall BJ, Kerlin P, Devereux BM (2005) Postoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic choledochotomy for clearance of selected bile duct calculi: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 242:188–192PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bansal VK, Misra MC, Garg P, Prabhu M (2010) A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24:1986–1989. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0891-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, Lewis MP (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351:159–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sgourakis G, Karaliotas K (2002) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study. Minerva Chir 57:467–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, Sarnari J, De Sanctis A, D’Ambrosio G, Lezoche G, Perretta S, Lezoche E (2007) Thirteen years’ experience with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for stones Effectiveness and long-term results. Surg Endosc 21:34–40. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0286-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Waage A, Stromberg C, Leijonmarck CE, Arvidsson D (2003) Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 17:1181–1185. doi:10.1007/s00464-002-8937-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Campbell-Lloyd AJ, Martin DJ, Martin IJ (2008) Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a 5-year follow up of 150 consecutive patients. ANZ J Surg 78:492–494. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04541.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Overby DW, Apelgren KN, Richardson W, Fanelli R, Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2010) SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc 24:2368–2386. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1268-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petelin JB (2003) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 17:1705–1715. doi:10.1007/s00464-002-8917-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alexakis N, Connor S (2012) Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. HPB (Oxford) 14:254–259. doi:10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00439.x;10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00439.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tranter SE, Thompson MH (2002) Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 89:1495–1504. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02291.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Noble H, Whitley E, Norton S, Thompson M (2011) A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 25:130–139. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1146-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Berthou JC, Dron B, Charbonneau P, Moussalier K, Pellissier L (2007) Evaluation of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones in a prospective series of 505 patients: indications and results. Surg Endosc 21:1970–1974. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9387-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bove A, Bongarzoni G, Palone G, Di Renzo RM, Calisesi EM, Corradetti L, Di Nicola M, Corbellini L (2009) Why is there recurrence after transcystic laparoscopic bile duct clearance? Risk factor analysis. Surg Endosc 23:1470–1475. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0377-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pereira-Lima JC, Jakobs R, Winter UH, Benz C, Martin WR, Adamek HE, Riemann JF (1998) Long-term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms. Gastrointest Endosc 48:457–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schreurs WH, Juttmann JR, Stuifbergen WN, Oostvogel HJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (2002) Management of common bile duct stones: selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic sphincterotomy: short- and long-term results. Surg Endosc 16:1068–1072. doi:10.1007/s00464-001-9104-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ando T, Tsuyuguchi T, Okugawa T, Saito M, Ishihara T, Yamaguchi T, Saisho H (2003) Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy. Gut 52:116–121PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim KH, Rhu JH, Kim TN (2012) Recurrence of bile duct stones after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation combined with limited sphincterotomy: long-term follow-up study. Gut Liver 6:107–112. doi:10.5009/gnl.2012.6.1.107;10.5009/gnl.2012.6.1.107 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Poulose BK, Arbogast PG, Holzman MD (2006) National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores. Surg Endosc 20:186–190. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-0235-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Parks R, Martin D, Lombard M, British Society of Gastroenterology (2008) Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 57:1004–1021. doi:10.1136/gut.2007.121657 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kharbutli B, Velanovich V (2008) Management of preoperatively suspected choledocholithiasis: a decision analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1973–1980. doi:10.1007/s11605-008-0624-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stromberg C, Nilsson M (2011) Nationwide study of the treatment of common bile duct stones in Sweden between 1965 and 2009. Br J Surg 98:1766–1774. doi:10.1002/bjs.7690;10.1002/bjs.7690 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Topal B, Aerts R, Penninckx F (2007) Laparoscopic common bile duct stone clearance with flexible choledochoscopy. Surg Endosc 21:2317–2321. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9577-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Mattila
    • 1
  • Jussi Luhtala
    • 2
  • Johanna Mrena
    • 1
  • Hannu Kautiainen
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ilmo Kellokumpu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryCentral Hospital of Central FinlandJyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Hyvinkää HospitalHospital District of Helsinki and UusimaaHyvinkääFinland
  3. 3.Department of General Practice, Primary Health Care UnitTurku University HospitalTurkuFinland
  4. 4.Department of Surgery, Unit of Primary Health CareHelsinki University HospitalHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations