Routine colonoscopy is not required in uncomplicated diverticulitis: a systematic review
- 922 Downloads
It is generally accepted that patients following an episode of diverticulitis should have additional colonoscopy screening to rule out a colorectal malignancy. We aimed to investigate the rate of CRC found by colonoscopy after an attack of uncomplicated diverticulitis.
MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched systematically for clinical trials or observational studies on colonic evaluation by colonoscopy after the initial diagnosis of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis, followed by hand-searching of reference lists.
Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and included a total number of 2,490 patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis. Subsequent colonoscopy after an episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis was performed in 1,468 patients (59 %). Seventeen patients were diagnosed with CRC, having a prevalence of 1.16 % (95 % confidence interval 0.72–1.9 % for CRC). Hyperplastic polyps were seen in 156 patients (10.6 %), low-grade adenoma in 90 patients (6.1 %), and advanced adenoma was reported in 32 patients (2.2 %).
Unless colonoscopy is regarded for screening in individuals aged 50 years and older, routine colonoscopy in the absence of other clinical signs of CRC is not required.
KeywordsColonoscopy Diverticulitis Colorectal cancer Uncomplicated diverticulitis Systematic review
The authors thank the following authors for providing additional data on their studies: Prof Frizelle, Dr. Wallace, Dr. Schout, Dr. Ahmeidat, Dr. Alexandersson, and Dr. Schmilovitz.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
- 3.Painter NS, Burkitt DP (1971) Diverticular disease of the colon: a deficiency disease of Western civilization BMJ ii:450–454Google Scholar
- 7.Peery AF, Sandler RS (2013) Diverticular disease: reconsidering conventional wisdom. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol [epub]Google Scholar
- 19.OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. “The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence.” Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/mod_product/design/files/CEBM-Levels-of-Evidence-2.1.pdf
- 21.Ahmeidat H, Kai-Yip Fung A, McAteer D, Aly EH (2012) CT diagnosed acute diverticulitis: Is the cost for subsequent colonoscopy to exclude associated carcinoma justified? Colorectal Dis 14(Suppl 2):19Google Scholar
- 22.Alexandersson BP, Stefansson JP, Bjornsson ES (2012) The risk of colorectal cancer is not increased in patients after an attack of diverticulitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 47(pp S26)Google Scholar
- 25.Schmilovitz-Weiss H, Yalunin E, Boaz M, Sehayek-Shabbat V, Levin I, Chervinski A et al (2012) Does a colonoscopy after acute diverticulitis affect its management? A single-center experience. J Clin Gastroenterol 46(4):317–320Google Scholar
- 29.Elramah MM, Horwitz JP, Einstein MM, Qureshi J, Leo J, Omballi M et al (2010) Colonoscopic evaluation after acute diverticulitis-is there an association with colonic malignancy? Gastrointest Endosc 71(5):AB188Google Scholar
- 46.Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2009) Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Available at: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/pdf/Systematic_Reviews.pdf
- 47.Dundar Y, Dodd S, Dickson R, Walley T, Haycox A, Williamson PR (2006) Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies. Health Technol Assess 10(5)Google Scholar