Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 1158–1165 | Cite as

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for idiopathic achalasia: randomized comparison of water-jet assisted versus conventional dissection technique

  • Ming-Yan Cai
  • Ping-Hong Zhou
  • Li-Qing Yao
  • Mei-Dong Xu
  • Yun-Shi Zhong
  • Quan-Lin Li
  • Wei-Feng Chen
  • Jian-Wei Hu
  • Zhao Cui
  • Bo-Qun Zhu
Article

Abstract

Background

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has recently been introduced as a promising alternative to laparoscopic Heller myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. Several proposed technical modifications are yet to be tested in randomized trials.

Objective

The objective of our study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of water-jet (WJ) assisted POEM versus the conventional (C) technique. The clinical trial registration number is NCT01742494.

Methods

A prospective randomized trial was carried out in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (Shanghai, China), in 100 consenting achalasia patients between August 2011 and April 2012. Patients eligible for POEM were randomized to use of either the HybridKnife (WJ group) or the conventional technique using injection and triangle tip knife interchangeably (C group).

Results

A total of 100 patients with comparable characteristics between groups were included. Procedure time was significantly shorter for the WJ group (22.9 ± 6.7 vs. 35.9 ± 11.7 min; p < 0.0001), mostly due to less replacement of accessories (2.0 ± 2.4 vs. 19.2 ± 7.6; p < 0.0001). Injection volume was larger in the WJ group (45.3 ± 10.2 vs. 35.2 ± 9.5 ml; p < 0.0001) and was associated with fewer minor bleeding episodes (3.6 ± 1.8 vs. 6.8 ± 5.2; p < 0.0001). No severe complications occurred; one case of cutaneous emphysema occurred in the WJ group, and four cases occurred in the C group (p = 0.17), three cases of pneumonia were encountered in the C group and none in the WJ group (p = 0.24). Treatment success (Eckardt score ≤3) was achieved in 96.5 % of patients, with no significant differences between groups.

Conclusions

The use of the HybridKnife leads to a significant decrease in POEM procedure time and facilitates reinjection, possibly contributing to a lower rate of minor intra-procedural bleeding.

Keywords

Achalasia Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) Water-jet assisted procedure 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by Grants from the Medical Leading Project of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Committee 10411969600 (P.H.Z), 11411950502 (P.H.Z), and 10411955900 (W.F.C) and Major Project of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Committee 11DZ2280400 (L.Q.Y). Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH (Tuebingen, Germany) supported this study by providing the HybridKnifeTM. The authors thank Dr. Thomas Rösch from University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf for the advice on manuscript preparation and critical reading of this manuscript.

Disclosure

Drs. Ming-Yan Cai, Ping-Hong Zhou, Li-Qing Yao, Mei-Dong Xu, Yun-Shi Zhong, Quan-Lin Li, Wei-Feng Chen, Jian-Wei Hu, Zhao Cui and Bo-Qun Zhu have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Pohl D, Tutuian R (2007) Achalasia: an overview of diagnosis and treatment. J Gastrointes Liver Dis 16:297–303Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chan KC, Wong SK, Lee DW et al (2004) Short-term and long-term results of endoscopic balloon dilation for achalasia: 12 years’ experience. Endoscopy 36:690–694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kilic A, Schuchert MJ, Pennathur A et al (2009) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Surgery 146:826–831 discussion 831–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cowgill SM, Villadolid D, Boyle R et al (2009) Laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia: results after 10 years. Surg Endosc 23:2644–2649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weber CE, Davis CS, Kramer HJ et al (2012) Medium and long-term outcomes after pneumatic dilation or laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia: a meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:289–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB et al (2011) Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 364:1807–1816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Costamagna G, Marchese M, Familiari P et al (2012) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for oesophageal achalasia: preliminary results in humans. Dig Liver Dis 44:827–832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    von Renteln D, Inoue H, Minami H et al (2011) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a prospective single center study. Am J Gastroenterol 107:411–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y et al (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42:265–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Swanstrom LL, Rieder E, Dunst CM (2011) A stepwise approach and early clinical experience in peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia and esophageal motility disorders. J Am Coll Surg 213:751–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lingenfelder T, Fischer K, Sold MG et al (2009) Combination of water-jet dissection and needle-knife as a hybrid knife simplifies endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 23:1531–1535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schumacher B, Charton JP, Nordmann T et al (2012) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric neoplasia with a water jet-assisted knife: a Western, single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 75:1166–1174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ren Z, Zhong Y, Zhou P et al (2012) Perioperative management and treatment for complications during and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia (EA) (data from 119 cases). Surg Endosc 26:3267–3272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ott DJ, Richter JE, Chen YM et al (1987) Esophageal radiography and manometry: correlation in 172 patients with dysphagia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 149:307–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    El-Takli I, O’Brien P, Paterson WG (2006) Clinical diagnosis of achalasia: how reliable is the barium X-ray? Can J Gastroenterol 20:335–337PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ming-Yan Cai
    • 1
  • Ping-Hong Zhou
    • 1
  • Li-Qing Yao
    • 1
  • Mei-Dong Xu
    • 1
  • Yun-Shi Zhong
    • 1
  • Quan-Lin Li
    • 1
  • Wei-Feng Chen
    • 1
  • Jian-Wei Hu
    • 1
  • Zhao Cui
    • 1
  • Bo-Qun Zhu
    • 1
  1. 1.Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan HospitalFudan UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations