Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 143–155

Fundoplication versus medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Nadja Rickenbacher
  • Thomas Kötter
  • Michael M. Kochen
  • Martin Scherer
  • Eva Blozik
Article

Abstract

Background

Medical, endoscopic, and open/laparoscopic surgical methods are used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing medical and surgical treatments of GERD in adult patients.

Methods

For the study, MEDLINE and EMBASE (1980–2012) were searched. Two reviewers independently assessed methodologic aspects and extracted data from eligible studies, focusing on patient-relevant outcomes. The primary outcomes were health-related and GERD-specific quality-of-life aspects. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) between treatment groups were calculated and combined using random-effect meta-analysis.

Results

The study identified 11 publications reporting on 7 trials comparing surgical (open or laparoscopic) and medical treatment of GERD. Meta-analysis of both quality-of-life aspects showed a pooled-effect estimate in favor of fundoplication (SMD 0.18; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.01–0.35; SMD 0.33; 95 % CI 0.13–0.54). Heartburn and regurgitation were less frequent after surgical intervention. However, a considerable proportion of patients still needed antireflux medication after fundoplication. Nevertheless, the surgical patients were significantly more satisfied with their symptom control and showed higher satisfaction with the treatment received.

Conclusions

This systematic review showed that surgical management of GERD is more effective than medical management with respect to patient-relevant outcomes in the short and medium term. However, long-term studies still are needed to determine whether antireflux surgery is an equivalent alternative to lifelong medical treatment.

Keywords

Fundoplication Gastroesophageal reflux Anti-ulcer agents Proton pump inhibitors Review Meta-analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Dent J, El-Serag H, Wallander MA, Johansson S (2005) Epidemiology of gastrooesoghageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 54:710–717PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moller Hansen J, Wildner-Christensen M, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB (2009) Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in a Danish Population: a prospective follow-up analysis of symptoms, quality-of-life, and health-care use. Am J Gastroenterol 104:2394–2403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF (2013) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 108:308–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khalili H, Huang ES, Jacobson BC, Camargo CA, Feskanich D, Chan AT (2012) Use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of hip fracture in relation to dietary and lifestyle factors: a prospective cohort study. BMJ 344:e372PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gray SL, LACroix AZ, Larson J, Robbins J, Cauley JA, Manson JE, Chen Z (2010) Proton pump inhibitor use, hip fracture, and change in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the Women’s Health Initiative. Arch Int Med 170:765–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neufel M, Graham A (2007) Levels of evidence available for techniques in antireflux surgery. Dis Esophagus 20:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koch OO, Kaindlstorfer A, Antoniou SA, Luketina RR, Emmanuel K, Pointner R (2013) Comparison of results from a randomized trial 1 year after laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplications. Surg Endosc 27(7):2383–2390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Behar J, Sheahan DG, Biancani P, Spiro HM, Storer EH (1975) Medical and surgical management of reflux esophagitis: a 38-month report of a prospective clinical trial. N Eng J Med 293:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spechler SJ (1992) Comparison of medical and surgical therapy for complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease in veterans. The Department of Veterans Affairs Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group. N Engl J Med 326:786–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Allgood PC, Bachmann M (2000) Medical or surgical treatment for chronic gastrooesophageal reflux? A systematic review of published evidence of effectiveness. Eur J Surg 166:713–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Urbach DR, Horvath KD, Baxter NN, Jobe BA, Madan AK, Pryor AD, Khaitan L, Torquati A, Brower ST, Trus TL, Schwaitzberg S (2007) A research agenda for gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 21:1518–1525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frazzoni M, Piccoli M, Conigliaro R, Manta R, Frazzoni L, Melotti G (2013) Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease as diagnosed by impedance-pH monitoring can be cured by laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc 27(8):2940–2946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 323:42–46PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spechler SJ, Lee E, Ahnen D, Goyal RK, Hirano I, Ramirez F, Raufman JP, Sampliner R, Schnell T, Sontag S, Vlahcevic ZR, Young R, Williford W (2001) Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized con-trolled trial. JAMA 285:2331–2338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold HE, Pedersen SA, Liedman B, Hatlebakk JG, Julkonen R, Levander K, Carlsson J, Lamm M, Wiklund I (2001) Continued (5-year) follow-up of a randomized clinical study comparing antireflux surgery and omeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Coll Surg 192:172–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold HE, Hatlebakk JG, Wallin L, Engström C, Julkunen R, Montgomery M, Malm A, Lind T, Walan A, Nordic GERD Study Group (2009) Comparison of outcomes twelve years after antireflux surgery or omeprazole maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:1292–1298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mahon D, Rhodes M, Decadt B, Hindmarsh A, Lowndes R, Beckingham I, Koo B, Newcombe RG (2005) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication compared with proton pump inhibitors for treatment of chronic gastroesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 92:695–699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mehta S, Bennett J, Mahon D, Rhodes M (2006) Prospective trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitor therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease: seven-year follow-up. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1312–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Anvari M, Allen C, Marshall J, Armstrong D, Goeree R, Ungar W, Goldsmith C (2006) A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for treatment of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease: one-year follow-up. Surg Innov 13:238–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anvari M, Allen C, Marshall J, Armstrong D, Goeree R, Ungar W, Goldsmith C (2011) A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): 3-year outcomes. Surg Endosc 25:2547–2554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grant AM, Wileman SM, Ramsay CR, Mowat NA, Krukowski ZH, Heading RC, Thursz MR, Campbell MK, REFLUX Trial Group (2008) Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: UK collaborative randomised trial. BMJ 337:a2664PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grant AM, Cotton SC, Boachie C, Ramsay CR, Krukowski ZH, Heading RC, Campbell MK, REFLUX Trial Group (2013) Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: five year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial (REFLUX). BMJ 346:f1908PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lundell L, Attwood S, Ell C, Fiocca R, Galmiche JP, Hatlebakk J, Lind T, Junghard O, LOTUS trial collaborators (2008) Comparing laparoscopic antireflux surgery with esomeprazole in the management of patients with chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a 3-year interim analysis of the LOTUS trial. Gut 57:1207–1213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Galmiche JP, Hatlebakk J, Attwood S, Ell C, Fiocca R, Eklund S, Långström G, Lind T, Lundell L, LOTUS Trial Collaborators (2011) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery vs. esomeprazole treatment for chronic GERD: the LOTUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305:1969–1977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Egger M (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. BMJ, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Higgins JPT, Green S (2009) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.0.2. at www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed 18 Mar 2013
  28. 28.
    Noble LJ, Dalzell AM, El-Matary W (2012) The relationship between percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 26:2504–2512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wileman SM, McCann S, Grant AM, Krukowski ZH, Bruce J (2010) Medical versus surgical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17(3):CD003243Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Miholic J, Hafez J, Lenglinger J, Wrba F, Wischin C, Schütz K, Hudec M (2012) Hiatal hernia, Barrett’s esophagus, and long-term symptom control after laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux. Surg Endosc 26:3225–3231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ip S, Tatsioni A, Conant A, Karagozian R, Fu L, Chew P, Raman G, Lau J, Bonis P (2009) Predictors of clinical outcomes following fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease remain insufficiently defined: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 104:752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    NICE (2004) Dyspepsia: managing dyspepsia in adults in primary care: clinical guidelines, CG17. at http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG017fullguideline.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2013
  33. 33.
    Stefanidis D, Hope WW, Kohn GP, Reardon PR, Richardson WS, Fanelli RD, SAGES Guidelines Committee (2010) Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 24:2647–2669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadja Rickenbacher
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Thomas Kötter
    • 2
  • Michael M. Kochen
    • 4
  • Martin Scherer
    • 3
  • Eva Blozik
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Swiss Federal Office of Public HealthBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Institute for Social Medicine and EpidemiologyUniversity of LübeckLübeckGermany
  3. 3.Department of Primary Medical CareUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  4. 4.Division of Family MedicineUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations