Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 11, pp 4124–4129

Embryonic NOTES thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: results of a novel technique and comparison with the conventional VATS procedure

  • Li-Huan Zhu
  • Long Chen
  • Shengsheng Yang
  • Daoming Liu
  • Jixue Zhang
  • Xianjin Cheng
  • Weisheng Chen
Article

Abstract

Background

To avoid the disadvantages of chronic pain and chest wall paresthesia associated with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) procedures, we developed a novel surgical technique for performing sympathectomy by embryonic natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES) with a flexible endoscope. In this study, we compared the outcomes of E-NOTES with conventional VATS thoracic sympathectomy on palmar hyperhidrosis.

Methods

From January 2010 to April 2011, a total of 66 patients with severe palmar hyperhidrosis were treated with thoracic sympathectomy in our department. Thirty-four transumbilical thoracic sympathectomies were performed via a 5-mm umbilicus incision with ultrathin gastroscope, then compared with 32 conventional needlescopic thoracic sympathectomies. Retrospective statistical analysis of a prospectively collected group of patients was performed.

Results

There was no significant difference with regard to gender, mean age, body mass index, and length of hospital stay between the two groups. The operative time for E-NOTES thoracic sympathectomy was longer than that of VATS thoracic sympathectomy (56.4 ± 10.8 vs. 40.3 ± 6.5 min, p < 0.01). No mortality, diaphragmatic hernia, or Horner syndrome was observed in either group. Postoperative questionnaires were returned by all treated patients with a mean time from operation to follow-up of 1.4 ± 0.3 years. All 66 patients receiving sympathectomy reported successful treatment of their palmar hyperhidrosis. Compensatory hyperhidrosis was noticed in 7 (20.1 %) and 6 (18.8 %) patients in the E-NOTES and VATS groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Postoperative pain and paresthesia were significantly reduced in the E-NOTES group at each time interval, and the aesthetic effect of the incision was superior in the E-NOTES group.

Conclusions

Transumbilical-diaphragmatic thoracic sympathectomy is a safe and efficacious alternative to the conventional approach. This novel procedure can further reduce postoperative pain and chest wall paresthesia as well as afford maximum cosmetic benefits by hiding the surgical incision in the umbilicus.

Keywords

Embryonic NOTES Palmar hyperhidrosis Thoracic sympathectomy Video-assisted thoracic surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Wong RH, Ng CS, Wong JK, Tsang S (2012) Needlescopic video-assisted thoracic surgery for reversal of thoracic sympathectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 14:350–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sihoe AD, Manlulu AV, Lee TW, Thung KH, Yim AP (2007) Pre-emptive local anesthesia for needlescopic video-assisted thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 31:103–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sihoe AD, Cheung CS, Lai HK, Lee TW, Thung KH, Yim AP (2005) Incidence of chest wall paresthesia after needlescopic video-assisted thoracic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27:313–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dewey TM, Herbert MA, Hill SL, Prince SL, Mack MJ (2006) One-year follow-up after thoracoscopic sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis: outcomes and consequences. Ann Thorac Surg 81:1227–1232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhu LH, Wang W, Yang S, Li D, Zhang Z, Chen S, Cheng X, Chen L, Chen W (2013) Transumbilical thoracic sympathectomy with an ultrathin flexible endoscope in a series of 38 patients. Surg Endosc 27:2149–2155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yang C, Chu Y, Wu YC, Hsieh MJ, Lu MS, Liu CY, Yuan HC, Liu YH, Ko PJ, Liu HP (2012) The lateral decubitus position improves transoral endoscopic access to the posterior aspects of the thorax. Surg Endosc 26:2988–2992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rodríguez PM, Freixinet JL, Hussein M, Valencia JM, Gil RM, Herrero J, Caballero-Hidalgo A (2008) Side effects, complications and outcome of thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis in 406 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 34:514–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu CY, Chu Y, Wu YC, Yuan HC, Ko PJ, Liu YH, Liu HP (2013) Transoral endoscopic surgery versus conventional thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic intervention: safety and efficacy in a canine survival model. Surg Endosc 27:2428–2435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Turner BG, Gee DW, Cizginer S, Konuk Y, Karaca C, Willingham F, Mino-Kenudson M, Morse C, Rattner DW, Brugge WR (2010) Feasibility of endoscopic transesophageal thoracic sympathectomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 71:171–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horgan S, Cullen JP, Talamini MA, Mintz Y, Ferreres A, Jacobsen GR, Sandler B, Bosia J, Savides T, Easter DW, Savu MK, Ramamoorthy SL, Whitcomb E, Agarwal S, Lukacz E, Dominguez G, Ferraina P (2009) Natural orifice surgery: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 23:1512–1518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raznatović ZJ, Zarić ND, Djurasić LM, Lekić NS, Djordjević VR, Radojković ZZ, Veselinović MD, Duka SV, Kerkez MD (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy—initial experience with different multichannel ports. Acta Chir Iugosl 59:67–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goh PM, Cheah WK, De Costa M, Sim EK (2000) Needlescopic thoracic sympathectomy: treatment for palmar hyperhidrosis. Ann Thorac Surg 70:240–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu Y, Yang J, Liu J, Yang F, Jiang G, Li J, Huang Y, Wang J (2009) Surgical treatment of primary palmar hyperhidrosis: a prospective randomized study comparing T3 and T4 sympathicotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35:398–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lyra Rde M, Campos JR, Kang DW, Loureiro Mde P, Furian MB, Costa MG, Coelho Mde S (2008) Guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of compensatory hyperhidrosis. J Bras Pneumol 34:967–977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sugimura H, Spratt EH, Compeau CG, Kattail D, Shargall Y (2009) Thoracoscopic sympathetic clipping for hyperhidrosis: longterm results and reversibility. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:1376–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baumgartner FJ (2008) Surgical approaches and techniques in the management of severe hyperhidrosis. Thorac Surg Clin 18:167–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miller DL, Bryant AS, Force SD, Miller JI Jr (2009) Effect of sympathectomy level on the incidence of compensatory hyperhidrosis after sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138:581–585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weksler B, Blaine G, Souza ZB, Gavina R (2009) Transection of more than one sympathetic chain ganglion for hyperhidrosis increases the severity of compensatory hyperhidrosis and decreases patient satisfaction. J Surg Res 156:110–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Atkinson JL, Fode-Thomas NC, Fealey RD, Eisenach JH, Goerss SJ (2011) Endoscopic transthoracic limited sympathotomy for palmar–plantar hyperhidrosis: outcomes and complications during a 10-year period. Mayo Clin Proc 86:721–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    de Campos JR, Wolosker N, Yazbek G, Munia MA, Kauffman P, Puech-Leao P, Jatene FB (2010) Comparison of pain severity following video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy: electric versus harmonic scalpels. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 10:919–922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Li-Huan Zhu
    • 1
  • Long Chen
    • 1
  • Shengsheng Yang
    • 1
  • Daoming Liu
    • 1
  • Jixue Zhang
    • 1
  • Xianjin Cheng
    • 1
  • Weisheng Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryFuzhou General Hospital, Fujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations