Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 11, pp 4060–4066 | Cite as

Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted surgery for median arcuate ligament syndrome

  • Michael V. Do
  • Taylor A. Smith
  • Hernan A. Bazan
  • W. C. SternberghIII
  • Abbas E. Abbas
  • William S. Richardson
Article

Abstract

Background

Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is an uncommon disorder characterized by postprandial abdominal pain, weight loss, and vomiting related to the compression of the celiac artery by the median arcuate ligament. This syndrome has been classically treated with an open surgical approach. More recently, laparoscopic and robotic approaches have been used. We present our outcomes with laparoscopic and robot-assisted treatment of MALS.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated for MALS from March 2006 to August 2012 at a single institution.

Results

A total of 16 patients with MALS were treated: 12 patients via a laparoscopic approach and 4 patients via a robot-assisted approach. Patient characteristics and comorbidities were similar between groups. We experienced no intraoperative or perioperative conversions, complications, or deaths. The mean operative time for the laparoscopic approach was significantly shorter than for the robotic approach (101.7 vs. 145.8 min; P = 0.02). However, we found no significant difference in length of hospital stay (1.7 vs. 1.3 days, P = 0.23). The mean length of follow-up for laparoscopically treated patients was 22.2 months and for robotically treated patients it was 20 months. Eight patients (67 %) in the laparoscopic group and two patients (50 %) in the robotic group had full resolution of their abdominal pain. Three patients in the laparoscopic group and two patients in the robotic group ceased chronic narcotic use after surgery.

Conclusions

Both laparoscopic and robotic approaches to MALS treatment can be performed with minimal morbidity and mortality. The laparoscopic approach was associated with a significantly shorter operative time. While innovative, the true advantages to robot-assisted MALS surgery are yet to be seen.

Keywords

Laparoscopic surgery Median arcuate ligament syndrome Robot-assisted surgery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded solely though departmental resources.

Disclosures

Michael V. Do, Taylor A. Smith, Hernan A. Bazan, W. C. Sternbergh III, Abbas E. Abbas, and William S. Richardson have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Harjola PT (1963) A rare obstruction of the celiac artery. Report of a case. Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn 52:547–550PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roseborough GS (2009) Laparoscopic management of celiac artery compression syndrome. J Vasc Surg 50:124–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duffy AJ, Panait L, Eisenberg D, Bell RL, Roberts KE, Sumpio B (2009) Management of median arcuate ligament syndrome: a new paradigm. Ann Vasc Surg 23:778–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    El-Hayek KM, Titus J, Bui A (2013) Laparoscopic median arcuate ligament release: are we improving symptoms? J Am Coll Surg 216:272–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jimenez JC, Harlander-Locke M, Dutson EP (2012) Open and laparoscopic treatment of median arcuate ligament syndrome. J Vasc Surg 56:869–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tulloch AW, Jimenez JC, Lawrence PF, Dutson EP, Moore WS, Rigberg DA, Derubertis BG, Quinones-Baldrich WJ (2010) Laparoscopic versus open celiac ganglionectomy in patients with median arcuate ligament syndrome. J Vasc Surg 52:1283–1289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baccari P, Civilini E, Dordoni L, Melissano G, Nicoletti R, Chiesa R (2009) Celiac artery compression syndrome managed by laparoscopy. J Vasc Surg 50:134–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vaziri K, Hungness ES, Pearson EG, Soper NJ (2009) Laparoscopic treatment of celiac artery compression syndrome: case series and review of current treatment modalities. J Gastrointest Surg 13:293–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berard X, Cau J, Déglise S, Trombert D, Saint-Lebes B, Midy D, Corpataux JM, Ricco JB (2012) Laparoscopic surgery for coeliac artery compression syndrome: current management and technical aspects. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 43:38–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petersen AS, Vriens BH, Huisman AB, Kolkman JJ, Geelkerken RH (2009) Retroperitoneal endoscopic release in the management of celiac artery compression syndrome. J Vasc Surg 50:140–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Relles D, Moudgill N, Rao A, Rosato F, DiMuzio P, Eisenberg J (2012) Robotic-assisted median arcuate ligament release. J Vasc Surg 56:500–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meyer M, Gharagozloo F, Nguyen D, Tempesta B, Strother E, Margolis M (2012) Robotic-assisted treatment of celiac artery compression syndrome: report of a case and review of the literature. Int J Med Robot 8:379–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jaik NP, Stawicki SP, Weger NS, Lukaszczyk JJ (2007) Celiac artery compression syndrome: successful utilization of robotic-laparoscopic approach. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 16:93–96Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chou JW, Lin CM, Feng CL, Ting CF, Cheng KS, Chen YF (2012) Celiac artery compression syndrome: an experience in a single institution in Taiwan. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012:935721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dunbar JD, Molnar W, Beman FF, Marable SA (1965) Compression of the celiac trunk and abdominal angina. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 95:731–744PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gruber H, Loizides A, Peer S, Gruber I (2012) Ultrasound of the median arcuate ligament syndrome: a new approach to diagnosis. Med Ultrason 14:5–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scholbach T (2006) Celiac artery compression syndrome in children, adolescents, and young adults: clinical and color duplex sonographic features in a series of 59 cases. J Ultrasound Med 25:299–305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reuter SR, Bernstein EF (1973) The anatomic basis for respiratory variation in median arcuate ligament compression of the celiac artery. Surgery 73:381–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ilica AT, Kocaoglu M, Bilici A, Ors F, Bukte Y, Senol A, Ucoz T, Somuncu I (2007) Median arcuate ligament syndrome: multidetector computed tomography findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:728–731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aschenbach R, Basche S, Vogl TJ (2011) Compression of the celiac trunk caused by median arcuate ligament in children and adolescent subjects: evaluation with contrast-enhanced MR angiography and comparison with Doppler US evaluation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:556–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mensink PB, van Petersen AS, Kolkman JJ, Otte JA, Huisman AB, Geelkerken RH (2006) Gastric exercise tonometry: the key investigation in patients with suspected celiac artery compression syndrome. J Vasc Surg 44:277–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Levin DC, Baltaxe HA (1972) High incidence of celiac axis narrowing in asymptomatic individuals. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 116:426–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Soman S, Sudhakar SV, Keshava SN (2010) Celiac axis compression by median arcuate ligament on computed tomography among asymptomatic persons. Indian J Gastroenterol 29:121–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael V. Do
    • 1
  • Taylor A. Smith
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hernan A. Bazan
    • 2
    • 3
  • W. C. SternberghIII
    • 2
    • 3
  • Abbas E. Abbas
    • 4
  • William S. Richardson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryOchsner Clinic FoundationNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Department of Vascular SurgeryOchsner Clinic FoundationNew OrleansUSA
  3. 3.The University of Queensland School of MedicineOchsner Clinical SchoolNew OrleansUSA
  4. 4.Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Temple University HospitalTemple University School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations