Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 11, pp 4305–4312 | Cite as

Long-term follow-up evaluation of revisional gastric bypass after failed adjustable gastric banding

  • Alexander Perathoner
  • Matthias Zitt
  • Monika Lanthaler
  • Johann Pratschke
  • Matthias Biebl
  • Reinhard Mittermair
Article

Abstract

Background

Disappointing long-term results, frequent band failure, and high rates of band-related complications increasingly necessitate revisional surgery after adjustable gastric banding. Laparoscopic conversion to gastric bypass has been recommended as the procedure of choice. This single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term results of revisional gastric bypass after failed adjustable gastric banding.

Methods

The study included 108 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic conversion of gastric banding to gastric bypass from 2002 to 2012. Indications for surgery, operative data, weight development, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 3.4 years (maximum, 10 years).

Results

The most common indications for band removal were band migration, insufficient weight loss, and pouch dilation. The median interval between gastric banding and gastric bypass was 6.6 years. In 52 % of the cases, band removal and gastric bypass surgery were performed simultaneously as a single-stage laparoscopic procedure. The early postoperative morbidity rate was 10.2 %. The body mass index before gastric banding (43.3 kg/m2) decreased significantly to 37.9 kg/m2 before gastric bypass and to 28.8 kg/m2 5 years after gastric bypass.

Conclusions

This is the first report on the long-term outcome after conversion of failed adjustable gastric banding to gastric bypass. Findings have shown revisional gastric bypass to be a feasible bariatric procedure particularly for patients with insufficient weight loss that guarantees a constant and long-lasting weight loss.

Keywords

Band failure  Band removal  Gastric banding  Gastric bypass  Long-term outcome  Revisional bariatric surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Frezza EE, Wachtel MS (2009) The economic impact of morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 23:677–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL, Anis AH (2009) The incidence of comorbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and metaanalysis. BMC Public Health 9:88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lanthaler M, Aigner F, Kinzl J, Sieb M, Cakar-Beck F, Nehoda H (2010) Long-term results and complications following adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg 20:1078–1085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mittermair RP, Obermüller S, Perathoner A, Sieb M, Aigner F, Margreiter R (2009) Results and complications after Swedish adjustable gastric banding: 10 years experience. Obes Surg 19:1636–1641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weiss HG, Kirchmayr W, Klaus A, Bonatti H, Mühlmann G, Nehoda H, Himpens J, Aigner F (2004) Surgical revision after failure of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Br J Surg 91:235–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gagner M, Gumbs AA (2007) Gastric banding: conversion to sleeve, bypass, or DS. Surg Endosc 21:1931–1935PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weber M, Müller MK, Michel JM, Belal R, Horber F, Hauser R, Clavien PA (2003) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, but not rebanding, should be proposed as rescue procedure for patients with failed laparoscopic gastric banding. Ann Surg 238:827–833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mognol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP (2004) Laparoscopic conversion of laparoscopic gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review of 70 patients. Obes Surg 14:1349–1353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bueter M, Thalheimer A, Wierlemann A, Fein M (2009) Reoperations after gastric banding: replacement or alternative procedures? Surg Endosc 23:334–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ardestani A, Lautz DB, Tavakkolizadeh A (2011) Band revision versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion as salvage operation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7:33–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Calmes JM, Giusti V, Suter M (2005) Reoperative laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an experience with 49 cases. Obes Surg 15:316–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lanthaler M, Mittermair R, Erne B, Weiss H, Aigner F, Nehoda H (2006) Laparoscopic gastric rebanding versus laparoscopic gastric bypass as a rescue operation for patients with pouch dilatation. Obes Surg 16:484–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Srikanth MS, Oh KH, Fox SR (2011) Revision to malabsorptive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (MRNYGBP) provides long-term (10 years) durable weight loss in patients with failed anatomically intact gastric restrictive operations: long-term effectiveness of a malabsorptive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in salvaging patients with poor weight loss or complications following gastroplasty and adjustable gastric bands. Obes Surg 21:825–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Westling A, Ohrvall M, Gustavsson S (2002) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after previous unsuccessful gastric restrictive surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 6:206–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elnahas A, Graybiel K, Farrokhyar F, Gmora S, Anvari M, Hong D (2013) Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27:740–745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weiss H, Nehoda H, Labeck B, Peer R, Aigner F (2000) Gastroscopic band removal after intragastric migration of adjustable gastric band: a new minimal invasive technique. Obes Surg 10:167–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chapman AE, Kiroff G, Game P, Foster B, O’Brien P, Ham J, Maddern GJ (2004) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: a systematic literature review. Surgery 135:326–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cunneen SA, Phillips E, Fielding G, Banel D, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Sledge I (2008) Studies of Swedish adjustable gastric band and Lap-Band: systematic review and metaanalysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4:174–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hii MW, Lake AC, Kenfield C, Hopkins GH (2012) Laparoscopic conversion of failed gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: short-term follow-up and technical considerations. Obes Surg 22:1022–1028PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Wageningen B, Berends FJ, Van Ramshorst B, Janssen IF (2006) Revision of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 16:137–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robert M, Poncet G, Boulez J, Mion F, Espalieu P (2011) Laparoscopic gastric bypass for failure of adjustable gastric banding: a review of 85 cases. Obes Surg 21:1513–1519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sanchez H, Cabrera A, Cabrera K, Zerrweck C, Mosti M, Sierra M, Dominguez G, Herrera MF (2008) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revision procedure after restrictive bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 18:1539–1543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Suter M (2001) Laparoscopic band repositioning for pouch dilatation/slippage after gastric banding: disappointing results. Obes Surg 11:507–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Behrns KE, Smith CD, Kelly KA, Sarr MG (1993) Reoperative bariatric surgery: lessons learned to improve patient selection and results. Ann Surg 218:646–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Müller MK, Attigah N, Wildi S, Hahnloser D, Hauser R, Clavien PA, Weber M (2008) High secondary failure rate of rebanding after failed gastric banding. Surg Endosc 22:448–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Spivak H, Beltran OR, Slavchev P, Wilson EB (2007) Laparoscopic revision from LAP-BAND to gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 21:1388–1392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Langer FB, Bohdjalian A, Shakeri-Manesch S, Felberbauer FX, Ludvik B, Zacherl J, Prager G (2008) Inadequate weight loss vs secondary weight regain: laparoscopic conversion from gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 18:1381–1386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van Nieuwenhove Y, Ceelen W, Van Renterghem K, Van de Putte D, Henckens T, Pattyn P (2011) Conversion from band to bypass in two steps reduces the risk for anastomotic strictures. Obes Surg 21:501–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Perathoner
    • 1
  • Matthias Zitt
    • 1
  • Monika Lanthaler
    • 2
  • Johann Pratschke
    • 1
  • Matthias Biebl
    • 1
  • Reinhard Mittermair
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Visceral, Transplant, and Thoracic SurgeryInnsbruck Medical UniversityInnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic SurgeryInnsbruck Medical UniversityInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations