Barriers to the uptake of laparoscopic surgery in a lower-middle-income country
Despite the significant improvements in surgical care in developed countries, the adoption of laparoscopy in lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) has been sporadic and minimal. Although the most quoted explanation for this has been an apparent lack of resources and training, recent studies have demonstrated that these constraints may not be the only significant barrier. The overall aim of this study was to analyze barriers to the adoption of laparoscopic surgery at a hospital in an LMIC.
Using an exploratory case study design, this investigation identified barriers to the adoption of laparoscopic surgery in an LMIC. More than 600 hours of participant observation as well as 13 in-depth interviews and document analyses were collected over a 12-week period.
Three overarching barriers emerged from the data: (1) the organizational structure for funding laparoscopic procedures, (2) the hierarchical nature of the local surgical culture, and (3) the expertise and skills associated with a change in practice. The description of the first barrier shows how the ongoing funding structure, rather than upfront costs, of the laparoscopic program limited the number of laparoscopic cases. The description of the second barrier highlights the importance of understanding the local surgical culture in attempts to adopt new technology. The description of the third barrier emphasizes the fact that due to the generalist nature of surgical practice, surgeons were less willing to practice more technically complicated and time-consuming procedures.
This exploratory case study examining the barriers hindering the adoption of laparoscopy in an LMIC represents a novel approach to addressing issues that have plagued surgeons across LMICs for many years. These findings not only further understanding of how to improve the adoption of laparoscopy in LMICs but also challenge the economic-centric notions of the problems that affect the transfer of innovation across social, economic, and geographic boundaries.
KeywordsExploratory case study Laparoscopic surgery Lower-middle-income countries Qualitative Training
- 1.Andrus CH, Cosgrove JM, Longo WE (1998) Minimally invasive surgery: principles and outcomes. Harwood Academic Publishers, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 2.Jones DB, Wu JS, Soper NJ (2004) Laparoscopic surgery: principles and procedures, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 3.MacFadyen BV Jr, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR (1997) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12:315–321Google Scholar
- 7.Nande AG et al (2002) Modified technique of gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a developing country: a 5-year experience. Dig Surg 19:366–371; discussion 372Google Scholar
- 9.Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2013) SAGES global affairs. http://www.sages.org/projects/global_affairs/. Accessed 8 Feb 2013
- 11.Yin RK (2009) Case Study research: design and methods, vol 5. SAGE Inc., Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 12.Feagin J, Orum A, Sjoberg G (1991) A case for case study. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
- 15.Rice P, Ezzy D (1999) In-depth interviews, in qualitative research methods: a health focus. Chapter 3. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp 51–70Google Scholar
- 19.Flick U (2009) An introduction to qualitative research, 4th edn. SAGE Publications Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
- 20.Katz P (1999) The scalpel’s edge. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 21.Goffman E (1961) Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction. Bobbs-Merrill, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
- 22.Fox NJ (1991) The social meaning of surgery. Open University, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
- 32.Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 37.Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W (2008) Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography. BMJ 337:512–514Google Scholar