Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 8, pp 2907–2910 | Cite as

Laparoscopic colectomy reduces morbidity and mortality in obese patients

  • Karin Hardiman
  • Eric T. Chang
  • Brian S. Diggs
  • Kim C. Lu



Obesity is a growing epidemic in the US and increases the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery. Randomized, controlled trials of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy have shown equivalence but often exclude obese patients thus not answering whether obese patients may specifically benefit from laparoscopy. We hypothesized that obese patients would benefit from use of laparoscopy for colectomy.


We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2009 and chose elective laparoscopic and open segmental colectomy and ileocecal resections. We compared patients’ demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes. We used multivariate models to assess for predictors of complications in obese patients. These models included demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes.


35,998 patients were identified who underwent elective colectomy with primary anastomosis. Forty-four percent of the included cases were laparoscopic and 31 % of patients had a BMI greater than 30 (obese). Obese patients were more likely to have diabetes, hypertension, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, and dyspnea on exertion. We constructed a new variable called any complication that included all complications except 30-day mortality. In our multivariate analysis, laparoscopic approach in obese patients independently decreased the relative risk of superficial (odds ratio (OR) 0.72, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.63–0.82) and deep (OR 0.44, CI 0.31–0.61) surgical site infections, intra-abdominal infection (OR 0.61, CI 0.49–0.78), dehiscence (OR 0.50, CI 0.35–0.69), pneumonia (OR 0.60, CI 0.44–0.81), failure to wean from the ventilator (OR 0.64, CI 0.47–0.87), renal failure (OR 0.58, CI 0.35–0.96), urinary tract infection (OR 0.62, CI 0.49–0.79), sepsis (OR 0.53, CI 0.43–0.66), septic shock (OR 0.65, CI 0.47–0.90), any complication (OR 0.61, CI 0.55–0.67) and 30-day mortality (OR 0.56, CI 0.31–0.98).


Due to the significant decrease in the risk of morbidity and mortality, laparoscopic colectomy should be offered to obese patients whenever feasible.


Obesity Colectomy Laparoscopy Complications 


  1. 1.
    Flegal Km CMDOCLCLR (2010) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA 303(3):235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pessaux P et al (2004) Risk factors for mortality and morbidity after elective sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: prospective multicenter multivariate analysis of 582 patients. World J Surg 28(1):92–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Causey MW et al (2011) The impact of obesity on outcomes following major surgery for Crohn’s disease: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 54(12):1488–1495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khoury W, Kiran RP, Jessie T, Geisler D, Remzi FH (2010) Is the laparoscopic approach to colectomy safe for the morbidly obese? Surg Endosc 24(6):1336–1340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Makino T, Shukla PJ, Rubino F, Milsom JW (2012) The impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Ann Surg 255(2):228–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buunen M et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10(1):44–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anonymous (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cone MM et al (2011) Dramatic decreases in mortality from laparoscopic colon resections based on data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Arch Surg 146(5):594–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, McCarter MD, Bentrem DJ (2009) Effect of body mass index on short-term outcomes after colectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg 208(1):53–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mustain WC, Davenport DL, Hourigan JS, Vargas HD (2012) Obesity and laparoscopic colectomy: outcomes from the ACS-NSQIP database. Dis Colon Rectum 55(4):429–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karin Hardiman
    • 1
  • Eric T. Chang
    • 1
  • Brian S. Diggs
    • 2
  • Kim C. Lu
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations