Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 8, pp 2992–2999 | Cite as

Pure transvesical NOTES appendectomy using a 5-mm rigid laparoscope: a feasibility and survival study with porcine models

  • Chang Wook Jeong
  • Sangchul Lee
  • Jong Jin Oh
  • Seung Bae LeeEmail author
  • Seong Jin Jeong
  • Sung Kyu Hong
  • Seok-Soo Byun
  • Hyeon Hoe Kim
  • Sang Eun Lee
Dynamic Manuscript

Abstract

Background

Previously, the authors demonstrated the feasibility of a pure transvesical natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for uterine horn resection (UHR) using a rigid ureteroscope in swine as an appendectomy model. However, visualization was poor, and there was room for improvement. The authors have assessed the feasibility and safety of a revised technique that uses a 5-mm rigid laparoscope.

Methods

Eight operations on four female pigs (35–40 kg) were performed as a proof of concept study. Four right-side operations were performed in a survival model. The surgical procedure was similar to the original technique. However, the rigid ureteroscope was replaced by a 5-mm laparoscope after modification of the access system. In addition, the clipped metal threads used for bladder closure were easily placed with a long 13-gauge needle. In the survival model, a Foley catheter was placed for 1 day.

Results

The new technique provided considerably better visualization and operability than the original technique. The mean total operative time was 96.6 ± 18.2 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 15.0 ± 13.5 ml. On postoperative day 3, pig 2 in the survival study died of peritonitis resulting from a small bowel injury. The lab results for the other pigs demonstrated no adverse events and tolerable immune responses. Necropsy showed complete healing of the vesicotomy.

Conclusions

The revised transvesical NOTES UHR technique improved the outcomes and feasibility of the original technique. This approach may be translatable to human appendectomy procedures in the future.

Keywords

NOTES Bladder Appendectomy Survival model Surgical technique 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Research Fund (02-2011-008). All the experiments were conducted after approval was obtained from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Bundang Hospital of Seoul National University (Seongnam, South Korea). The IACUC number for the nonsurvival study is BA1005-062/028-01, and the IACUC number for the survival study is BA1112-094/073-01. We thank Ji Yeon Hwang, veterinarian at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, for care of the animals. We also thank Johnson & Johnson Medical Korea (Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.), H-Brothers Co., Ltd. (Korean distributor of Karl Stroz), and Stryker Korea for their nonfinancial support.

Disclosures

Chang Wook Jeong, Sangchul Lee, Jong Jin Oh, Seung Bae Lee, Seong Jin Jeong, Sung Kyu Hong, Seok-Soo Byun, Hyeon Hoe Kim, and Sang Eun Lee have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

Video 1 (WMV 7427 kb)

Video 2 (WMV 6990 kb)

Video 3 (WMV 6568 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Autorino R, Cadeddu JA, Desai MM, Gettman M, Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lima E, Montorsi F, Richstone L, Stolzenburg JU, Kaouk JH (2011) Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 59:26–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Granberg CF, Frank I, Gettman MT (2009) Transvesical NOTES: current experience and potential implications for urologic applications. J Endourol 23:747–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jayaraman S, Schlachta CM (2009) Transgastric and transparietal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in an appendectomy test bed. Surg Innov 16:223–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sumiyama K, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Bakken TA, Deters JL, Knipschield MA, Hawes RH, Kalloo AN, Pasricha PJ, Chung S, Kantsevoy SV, Cotton PB (2006) Pilot study of the porcine uterine horn as an in vivo appendicitis model for development of endoscopic transgastric appendectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 64:808–812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jeong CW, Oh JJ, Abdullajanov M, Yeon J, Lee HE, Jeong SJ, Hong SK, Byun SS, Lee SB, Kim HH, Lee SE (2012) Pure transvesical NOTES uterine horn resection in swine as an appendectomy model. Surg Endosc 26:558–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gettman MT, Lotan Y, Napper CA, Cadeddu JA (2002) Transvaginal laparoscopic nephrectomy: development and feasibility in the porcine model. Urology 59:446–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lima E, Rolanda C, Pego JM, Henriques-Coelho T, Silva D, Carvalho JL, Correia-Pinto J (2006) Transvesical endoscopic peritoneoscopy: a novel 5-mm port for intraabdominal scarless surgery. J Urol 176:802–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Osorio L, Silva D, Autorino R, Damiano R, Correia-Pinto J, Lima E (2011) Pure NOTES transvesical venous ligation: translational animal model of varicocelectomy. Urology 78:1082–1086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lima E, Henriques-Coelho T, Rolanda C, Pego JM, Silva D, Carvalho JL, Correia-Pinto J (2007) Transvesical thoracoscopy: a natural orifice translumenal endoscopic approach for thoracic surgery. Surg Endosc 21:854–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lima E, Rolanda C, Osorio L, Pego JM, Silva D, Henriques-Coelho T, Carvalho JL, Bergstrom M, Park PO, Mosse CA, Swain P, Correia-Pinto J (2009) Endoscopic closure of transmural bladder wall perforations. Eur Urol 56:151–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gettman MT, Blute ML (2007) Transvesical peritoneoscopy: initial clinical evaluation of the bladder as a portal for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Mayo Clin Proc 82:843–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chang Wook Jeong
    • 1
  • Sangchul Lee
    • 1
  • Jong Jin Oh
    • 1
  • Seung Bae Lee
    • 2
    Email author
  • Seong Jin Jeong
    • 1
  • Sung Kyu Hong
    • 1
  • Seok-Soo Byun
    • 1
  • Hyeon Hoe Kim
    • 3
  • Sang Eun Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologySeoul National University Bundang HospitalSeongnamKorea
  2. 2.Department of UrologySeoul National University Boramae HospitalSeoulKorea
  3. 3.Department of UrologySeoul National University HospitalSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations