Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 2373–2382 | Cite as

A prospective, randomized comparison of long-term outcomes: chronic groin pain and quality of life following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

  • Virinder Kumar Bansal
  • Mahesh C. Misra
  • Divya Babu
  • Jonathan Victor
  • Subodh Kumar
  • Rajesh Sagar
  • S. Rajeshwari
  • Asuri Krishna
  • Vimi Rewari
Article

Abstract

Background

Data are insufficient to compare transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) and total extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. There is very scant data comparing the two techniques in terms of long-term outcomes, which include chronic groin pain, quality of life, and time to return to normal activity. This prospective, randomized, controlled trial compared TEP versus TAPP techniques of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in terms of these long-term outcomes.

Methods

This study was conducted from May 1, 2007 to March 30, 2012. Patients with uncomplicated groin hernia were randomized to transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques. A total of 160 patients were randomized to group I (TEP) and 154 patients to group II (TAPP). Pain was assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) preoperatively and postoperatively at 24 h, 1 week, 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Quality of life was assessed with Short Form–36 version 2 (SF 36v2) preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months follow-up.

Results

Demographic, clinical profiles, intraoperative, and early postoperative parameters were well matched. There was significantly higher acute pain following TAPP repair; however, the chronic groin pain was comparable in both TEP and TAPP. Preoperative pain and immediate postoperative pain had significant correlation with chronic groin pain. Significant improvement from preoperative to postoperative quality of life was seen in both TEP and TAPP repairs, but there was no difference between TEP and TAPP in postoperative period. Time to return to normal activity also was similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

The TEP and TAPP techniques of laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia have comparable long-term outcomes in terms of incidence of chronic groin pain, quality of life, and resumption of normal activities. Chronic groin pain had a significant correlation with preoperative pain and early postoperative pain. However, TAPP was associated with significantly higher incidence of early postoperative pain, longer operative time, and cord edema, whereas TEP was associated with a significant higher incidence of seroma formation. The cost was comparable between the two.

Keywords

TEP versus TAPP repair Quality of life Chronic groin pain 

Notes

Disclosures

Drs. Virinder Kumar Bansal, M.C. Misra, Divya Babu, S. Rajeshwari, Rajesh Sagar, Jonathan Victor, Subodh Kumar, Asuri Krishna, and Vimi Rewari have no competing interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Fitzgobbins RJ, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO (2006) Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 295:285–292Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bradley M, Morgan D, Pentlow B (2003) The groin hernia: an ultrasound diagnosis? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:178–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montloor MM (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157:188–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL (1994) The Lichtenstein herniotomy procedure. Chirurg 64:54–58Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nicholson T, Tiruchelvan V (1999) Comparison of laparoscopic vs open modified Shouldice technique in inguinal hernia repair. JSLS 3:39–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koninger J, Redecke J, Butters M (2004) Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein and TAPP. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:361–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh AN, Bansal VK, Misra MC, Kumar S, Rajeshwari S, Kumar A, Sagar R, Kumar A (2011) Testicular functions, chronic groin pain, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc [Epub ahead of print] PMID:2208333Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brandt-Kerkhof A, van Mierlo M, Schep N, Renken N, Stassen L (2011) Follow-up period of 13 years after endoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias: a cohort study. Surg Endosc 25(5):1624–1629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wake BL, McCormack K, Fraser C, Vale L, Perez J, Grant AM (2005) Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) vs totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD004703Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am 83:1045–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Molinelli BM, Tagliavia A, Bernstein D (2006) Total extraperitoneal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair using spinal anesthesia. JSLS 10:341–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krishna A, Misra MC, Bansal VK, Kumar S, Rajeshwari S, Chabra A (2012) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 26:639–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Misra MC, Bhowate PD, Bansal VK, Kumar S (2009) Massive scrotal hernias: problems and solutions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:19–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Misra MC, Bansal VK, Kumar S, Prashant B, Bhattacharjee HK (2008) Total extra-peritoneal repair of groin hernia: prospective evaluation at a tertiary care center. Hernia 12:65–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Klinge U, Kockerling F, Kuhry E, Kukleta J, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Reinpold W, Rosenberg J, Sauerland S, Schug-Pass C, Singh K, Timoney M, Weyhe D, Chowbey P (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia [International Endohernia Society (IEHS)]. Surg Endosc 25:2773–2843PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohen RV, Alvarez G, Roll S et al (1998) Transabdominal or totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair? Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:264–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Felix EL, Michas CA, Gonzalez MH Jr (1995) Laparoscopic hernioplasty. TAPP vs TEP. Surg Endosc 9:984–989Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Hee R, Goverde P, Hendrickx L et al (1998) Laparoscopic transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective clinical trial. Acta Chir Belg 98:132–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Khoury N (1995) A comparative study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy. J Laparoendosc Surg 5:349–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tamme C, Scheidbach H, Hampe C, Schneider C, Kockerling F (2003) Totally extraperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP). Surg Endosc 17:190–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baca I, Schultz C, Gotzen V, Jazek G (2000) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A review of 2500 cases. In: Lomanto D, Kum CK, So JBY, Goh PMY, editors. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery 425–430Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lepere M, Benchetrit S, Debaert M et al (2001) A multicentric comparison of transabdominal versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair using PARIETEX meshes. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 4:147–153Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y, Zhu B, Zhang Z, Du D, Zhao X, Jiang H (2011) Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 25:234–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aasvang E, Kehlat H (2005) Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth 95:69–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Cairns W, Smith S, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chamber WA (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19:48–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P (1996) Co-operative study: pain in the post repair patient. Ann Surg 224:598–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wright D, Paterson C, Scott N (2002) Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235:333–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R et al (1996) Prospective randomised trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 83:1563–1566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:1–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Myers E, Katherine M, Kavanagh D, Hurley M (2010) Laparoscopic (TEP) versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. 34:3059-3064Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Puri V (2006) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg 72:197–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O et al (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomized comparison. Lancet 354:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Agrawal BB, Agrawal KA, Mahajan KC (2009) Prospective double blind randomized controlled study comprising heavyweight and lightweight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: early results. Surg Endosc 23:242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Akolekar D, Kumar S (2008) Comparison of recurrence with lightweight composite polypropylene mesh and heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an audit of 1,232 repairs. Hernia 12:39–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Misra MC, Kumar S, Bansal VK (2008) Total extraperitoneal (TEP) mesh repair of inguinal hernia in the developing world: comparison of low-cost indigenous balloon dissection versus direct telescopic dissection: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Endosc 22:1947–1958PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virinder Kumar Bansal
    • 1
  • Mahesh C. Misra
    • 1
  • Divya Babu
    • 1
  • Jonathan Victor
    • 1
  • Subodh Kumar
    • 1
  • Rajesh Sagar
    • 2
  • S. Rajeshwari
    • 3
  • Asuri Krishna
    • 1
  • Vimi Rewari
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Surgical DisciplinesAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Department of AnaesthesiologyAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations