Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1840–1841

Laparoscopic bisegmentectomy 6 and 7 using a Glissonian approach and a half-Pringle maneuver

  • Paulo Herman
  • Jaime Krüger
  • Renato Lupinacci
  • Fabricio Coelho
  • Marcos Perini
Multimedia Manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite accumulated experience and advancing techniques for laparoscopic hepatectomy, surgeons still face challenging resections that require specific and innovative intraoperative maneuvers [1, 2, 3]. The right posterior sectionectomy presents special concerns about its location, the extensive transection area, and the difficult access to the pedicle [4, 5]. The intrahepatic Glissonian approach allows safe en masse control of the portal structures without prolonged dissection [2]. Its association with the half-Pringle maneuver results in less bleeding during parenchymal transection [1, 6].

Methods

A 34-year-old woman was referred for treatment of an 8-cm hepatocellular adenoma located at segments 6 and 7. She was placed in a semi-supine position, and six ports were located in a distribution that resembled a Makuuchi incision. The right liver was mobilized, and preparation for an anatomic Glissonian approach was performed. A vascular clamp was placed to ensure that full control of the right posterior pedicle was possible. Then a vascular stapler replaced it, with division of the right posterior Glissonian pedicle. A vascular clamp was inserted from the inferior right-flank 5-mm trocar for performance of a half-Pringle maneuver of the right pedicle to minimize blood loss during parenchymal transection. The liver parenchyma was transected with a harmonic scalpel and a vascular stapler. The right hepatic vein was divided intraparenchymally with a vascular stapler. The specimen was extracted through a Pfannenstiel incision.

Results

The total surgical time was 210 min, and the estimated blood loss was 200 ml. No blood transfusion was required. The recovery was uneventful, and hospital discharge occurred on postoperative day 5. Pathology confirmed the diagnosis of an hepatocellular adenoma.

Conclusions

Technical issues initially hindered the development of laparoscopic liver resections [7, 8, 9, 10]. Surgeons were concerned about hemostasis, bleeding control, safe and effective parenchymal transection, adequate visualization, and the feasibility of working on deeper regions of the liver. During the past decade, many limitations were overcome, but lesions located on the posterosuperior liver are still considered tough to beat [5, 11]. Large series and extensive reviews [12, 13, 14] show that resections located on the posterior segments still are infrequent. Limited access to the portal triad, difficult pedicle control, and a large transection area and its anatomic location, attached to the diaphragm and retroperitoneum and hidden from the surgeon’s view, makes such resections defying. The authors’ team has performed 97 laparoscopic hepatectomies, including resection of 6 lesions in the right posterior sector. In their series, half-pedicle clamping was used for 12 patients, and they adopt such a maneuver as an inflow control when operating on peripheric lesions with difficult vascular control (e.g., enucleations or posterosuperiorly located segmentectomies). This technique is safe and useful because it reduces liver ischemic aggression, a very important issue with diseased livers (e.g., steatosis, steatohepatitis, prolonged chemotherapy, cirrhosis) [6, 15]. In their series, the authors applied the Glissonian intrahepatic approach in 7 cases (2 left hepatectomies and 5 right hepatectomies). They understand that laparoscopy applies perfectly to oddly (posterosuperior) located tumors and that right posterior sectionectomy can be accomplished safely. In fact, they share the opinion of other specialized hepatobiliary centers, believing that this may be the preferred approach [16].

Supplementary material

464_2012_2681_MOESM1_ESM.wmv (96.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (WMV 98740 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Herman P, Perini MV, Coelho F, Saad W, D’Albuquerque LA (2010) Half-Pringle maneuver: a useful tool in laparoscopic liver resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:35–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Machado MA, Makdissi FF, Galvão FH, Machado MC (2008) Intrahepatic Glissonian approach for laparoscopic right segmental liver resections. Am J Surg 196:e38–e42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yoon YS, Han HS, Choi YS, Jang JY, Suh KS, Kim SW, Lee KU, Park YH (2006) Total laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:274–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Torzilli G, Donadon M, Marconi M, Botea F, Palmisano A, Del Fabbro D, Procopio F, Montorsi M (2008) Systematic extended right posterior sectionectomy: a safe and effective alternative to right hepatectomy. Ann Surg 247:603–611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buell JS, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D’Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMatsers KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghitti J, Strassberg S, Chari RS (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Makuuchi M, Mori T, Gunvén P, Yamazaki S, Hasegawa H (1987) Safety of hemihepatic vascular occlusion during resection of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 164:155–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R, Malassagne B, Stephan F, Bensaid S et al (2000) Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 232:753–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C, Berticelli J, Mahajna A (2005) Laparoscopic liver resections: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 19:886–891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laurent A, Cherqui D, Lesurtel M, Brunetti F, Tayar C, Fag-niez PL (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic liver disease. Arch Surg 138:763–769; discussion 769Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dagher I, Proske JM, Carloni A, Richa H, Tranchart H, Franco D (2007) Laparoscopic liver resection: results for 70 patients. Surg Endosc 21:619–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Shin SH (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery 144:32–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller D (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver ressection—2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831– 841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, Abecassis M (2007) Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg 246:385–392; discussion 392– 394Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buell JF, Thomas MT, Rudich S, Marvin M, Nagubandi R, Ravindra KV, Brock G, McMasters KM (2008) Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures. Ann Surg 248:475–486PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chau GY, Lui WY, King KL, Wu CW (2005) Evaluation of effect of hemihepatic vascular occlusion and the Pringle maneuver during hepatic resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and impaired liver function. World J Surg 29: 1374–1383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gumbs AA, Gayet B (2008) Video: the lateral laparoscopic approach to lesions in the posterior segments. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paulo Herman
    • 1
  • Jaime Krüger
    • 1
  • Renato Lupinacci
    • 1
  • Fabricio Coelho
    • 1
  • Marcos Perini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyUniversity of Sao PauloSao PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations