Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 1397–1403 | Cite as

Impact of cumulative time on the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric neoplasm

  • Sun Min Lim
  • Jun Chul Park
  • Hyuk Lee
  • Sung Kwan Shin
  • Sang Kil Lee
  • Yong Chan Lee



Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be technically demanding and requires great attention to detail and prolonged concentration. We assumed that clinical outcomes of ESDs may be affected by cumulative time, and we aimed to compare complete resection rates and adverse events according to cumulative ESD time.


This study involved 1,328 consecutive patients with 1,461 gastric tumors who underwent ESD from January 2008 to July 2011 in a tertiary-care academic medical center. The main outcome measurements were en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, bleeding rate and perforation rate.


Patients were divided into three groups according to cumulative time intervals (<2 h vs. 2–4 h vs. ≥4 h). Complete resection rate did not differ among the three groups, but early post-ESD bleeding (EPEB) rate was significantly different among the three groups (2.5 vs. 3.5 % vs. 6.6 %, P = 0.040). In multivariate analysis, cumulative time period was an independent predictor of EPEB (2–4 h odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.05–5.01, P = 0.038; ≥4 h OR 3.99; 95 % CI, 2.15–7.65, P < 0.001). The rate of perforation was higher in ESDs performed after completing prior endoscopies or outpatient clinic session compared to those performed without prior work (3.8 vs. 1.6 %, P = 0.004). Moreover, prior workload before ESD was an independent predictor of perforation in multivariate analysis (OR 2.77, 95 % CI, 1.37–5.60, P = 0.005).


Our data suggest that cumulative ESD time did not influence en bloc or complete resection rate of ESD, but increased the rate of acute bleeding. Moreover, prior workload before ESDs may increase the risk of perforation.


Bleeding Complete resection Endoscopic submucosal dissection Fatigue Perforation 



Drs. S. M. Lim, J. C. Park, H. Lee, S. K. Shin, S. K. Lee, and Y. C. Lee have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Shimuzu S, Tada M, Kawai K (1995) Early gastric cancer: its surveillance and natural course. Endoscopy 27:27–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ikeda Y, Mori M, Koyanagi N, Wada H, Hayashi H, Tsugawa K, Miyazaki M, Haraguchi Y, Sugimachi K (1998) Features of early gastric cancer detected by modern diagnostic technique. J Clin Gastroenterol 27:60–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fujishiro M (2006) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for stomach neoplasm. World J Gastroenterol 12:5012–5108Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yahagi N, Fujishiro M, Kakushima N (2004) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer using the tip of an electro-sergical snare (thin type). Dig Endosc 16:34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oda I, Gotoda T, Hamanaka H (2005) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: technical feasibility, operation time and complications from a large consecutive series. Dig Endosc 17:54–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I, Mouri R, Hirata M, Kawamura T, Yoshihara M, Chayama K (2006) Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 64:877–883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sanaka MR, Deepinder F, Thota PN, Lopez R, Burke CA (2009) Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 104:1659–1664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanaka MR, Shah N, Mullen K, Ferguson DR, Thomas C, McCullough AJ (2006) Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2726–2730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chan MY, Cohen H, Spiegel BMR (2009) Fewer polyps detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses at a Veterans Administration teaching hospital. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:1217–1223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y (2000) The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 47:251–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaba DM, Howard SK (2002) Patient safety: fatigue among clinicians and the safety of patients. N Engl J Med 347:1249–1255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gaba DM, Howard SK, Jump B (1994) Production pressure in the work environment: California anesthesiologists’ attributes and experiences. Anesthesiology 81:488–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mehta PP, Sanaka MR, Parsi MA, Zuccaro G, Dumot JA, Lopez R, Vargo JJ (2011) Effect of time of day on the success and adverse events of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 74:303–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takizawa K, Oda I, Gotoda T, Yokoi C, Matsuda T, Saito Y, Saito D, Ono H (2008) Routine coagulation of visible vessels may prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection—an analysis of risk factors. Endoscopy 40:179–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Owens JA (2001) Sleep loss and fatigue in medical training. Curr Opin Pulm Med 7:411–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weinger MB, Ancoli-Israel S (2002) Sleep deprivation and clinical performance. JAMA 287:955–957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dawson D, Reid K (1997) Fatigue, alcohol and performance impairment. Nature 388:235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gerdes J, Kahol K, Smith M, Leyba MJ, Ferrara JJ (2008) Jack Barney award: the effect of fatigue on cognitive and psychomotor skills of trauma residents and attending surgeons. Am J Surg 196:813–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Higashiyama M, Oka S, Tanaka S, Sanomura Y, Imagawa H, Shishido T, Yoshida S, Chayama K (2011) Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric epithelial neoplasm. Dig Endosc 23:290–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sugimoto T, Okamoto M, Mitsuno Y, Kondo S, Oqura K, Ohmae T, Mizuno H, Yoshida S, Isomura Y, Yamaji Y, Kawabe T, Omata M, Koike K (2012) Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an effective and safe therapy for early gastric neoplasms: a multicenter feasible study. J Clin Gastroenterol 46:124–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chung IK, Lee JH, Lee SH, Kim SJ, Cho JY, Cho WY, Hwangbo Y, Keum BR, Park JJ, Chun HJ, Kim HJ, Kim JJ, Ji SR, Seoul SY (2009) Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 69:1228–1235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yoo JH, Shin SJ, Lee KM, Choi JM, Wi JO, Kim DH, Lim SG, Hwang JC, Cheong JY, Yoo BM, Lee KJ, Kim JH, Cho SW (2012) Risk factors for perforations associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric lesions: emphasis on perforation type. Surg Endosc 26:2456–2464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sun Min Lim
    • 1
  • Jun Chul Park
    • 2
  • Hyuk Lee
    • 2
  • Sung Kwan Shin
    • 2
  • Sang Kil Lee
    • 2
  • Yong Chan Lee
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of GastroenterologyYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations