Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study
- 3k Downloads
Patients undergoing colorectal cancer resections are at risk for delayed recovery. Prehabilitation aims to enhance functional capacity preoperatively for better toleration of surgery and to facilitate recovery. The authors previously demonstrated the limited impact of a prehabilitation program using exercise alone. They propose an expanded trimodal prehabilitation program that adds nutritional counseling, protein supplementation, and anxiety reduction to a moderate exercise program. This study aimed to estimate the impact of this trimodal program on the recovery of functional capacity compared with standard surgical care.
Consecutive patients were enrolled in this pre- and postintervention study over a 23-month period. The postoperative recovery for 42 consecutive patients enrolled in the prehabilitation program was compared with that of 45 patients assessed before the intervention began. The primary outcome was functional walking capacity (6-min walk test [6MWT]). The secondary outcomes included self-reported physical activity (CHAMPS questionnaire) and health-related quality of life (SF-36). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range [IQR]) and were analyzed using Chi-square and Student’s t test. All p values lower than 0.05 were considered significant.
The prehabilitation and control groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class. There was no difference in walking capacity at the first assessment (6MWT distance, 422 ± 87 vs 402 ± 57 m; p = 0.21). During the prehabilitation period lasting a median of 33 days (range, 21–46 days), functional walking capacity improved by 40 ± 40 m (p < 0.01). The postoperative complication rates and the hospital length of stay were similar. The patients in the prehabilitation program had better postoperative walking capacity at both 4 weeks (mean difference, 51.5 ± 93 m; p = 0.01) and 8 weeks (mean difference, 84.5 ± 83 m; p < 0.01). At 8 weeks, 81 % of the prehabilitated patients were recovered compared with 40 % of the control group (p < 0.01). The prehabilitation group also reported higher levels of physical activity before and after surgery.
In this pilot study, a 1-month trimodal prehabilitation program improved postoperative functional recovery. A randomized trial is ongoing (NCT01356264).
KeywordsFunctional recovery Perioperative care Prehabilitation Preoperative exercise
This research was supported by grants from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Ethicon Endosurgery Canada, and the Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Centre. The Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Covidien Canada.
C. Li reports research support from the Surgeon Scientist Program, Department of Surgery, McGill University. L. S. Feldman reports research and fellowship support from Covidien and research support from Ethicon. L. Lee reports research support from the Canadian Association of General Surgeons and salary support from the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec (FRSQ) and the McGill Surgeon Scientist program. F. Carli, P. Charlebois, B. Stein, A. S. Liberman, P. Kaneva, B. Augustin, M. Wongyingsinn, A. Gamsa, D. J. Kim, and M. C. Vassiliou have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 4.Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ (2011) Fast-track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (online):CD007635Google Scholar
- 15.Burd NA, Yang Y, Moore DR, Tang JE, Tarnopolsky MA, Phillips SM (2012) Greater stimulation of myofibrillar protein synthesis with ingestion of whey protein isolate v. micellar casein at rest and after resistance exercise in elderly men. Br J Nutr1–5Google Scholar
- 17.Burke DG, Chilibeck PD, Davison K, Candow D, Farthing J, Smith-Palmer T (2001) The effect of whey protein supplementation with and without creatine monohydrate combined with resistance training on lean tissue mass and muscle strength. Int J Sport Nutr Exercise Metabol 11:349–364Google Scholar
- 19.Marshall K (2004) Therapeutic applications of whey protein: alternative medicine review. J Clin Therapeutic 9:136–156Google Scholar
- 22.American Thoracic Society (2002) ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:111–117Google Scholar
- 28.Hopman WM, Towheed T, Anastassiades T, Tenenhouse A, Poliquin S, Berger C, Joseph L, Brown JP, Murray TM, Adachi JD (2000) Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Can Med Assoc J 163:265–271Google Scholar
- 32.Honaker J, King G, Blackwell M (2011) Amelia II: a program for missing data. J Stat Softw 45(7):1–47Google Scholar
- 33.Imai K, King G, Lau O (2006) Zelig: everyone’s statistical software. R package version 2.7–4Google Scholar
- 36.Canadian Society for Surgical Oncology (2009) CSSO position statement. Retrieved 31 March 2012 at http://www.cos.ca/csso/policy.html
- 37.Simunovic M, Theriault ME, Paszat L, Coates A, Whelan T, Holowaty E, Levine M (2005) Using administrative databases to measure waiting times for patients undergoing major cancer surgery in Ontario, 1993–2000. Can J of Surg (Journal Canadien de Chirurgie) 48:137–142Google Scholar
- 40.McHugh JE, Lawlor BA (2011) Exercise and social support are associated with psychological distress outcomes in a population of community-dwelling older adults. J Health PsycholGoogle Scholar
- 43.Rimer J, Dwan K, Lawlor DA, Greig CA, McMurdo M, Morley W, Mead GE (2012) Exercise for depression. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online) 7:CD004366Google Scholar