Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 801–807 | Cite as

Correlation of the gastroesophageal flap valve grade with the surgery rate in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

  • Huseyin Ayhan Kayaoglu



The importance of endoscopic evaluation and grading of the gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was previously demonstrated with increased acid exposure and high grades of esophagitis in those with high-grade valves. On the other hand, no data exist on the relationship between GEFV appearance and surgical rate.


For 453 patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD, GEFV grading and 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring were performed. Surgery was performed for 82 of these patients who failed medical management or had disease complications.


The GEFV grade 4 patients were younger than the patients with normal GEFV (grades 1 [p = 0.017] and 2 [p < 0.001]) and showed significant male predominance. The prevalence of hiatal hernia, the degree of esophageal acid exposure, and the prevalence and degree of erosive esophagitis significantly increased with GEFV grade (p < 0.001 for all). No GEFV grade 1 patients underwent surgery compared with 4.9 % of the grade 2 patients, 20.5 % of the grade 3 patients, and 63.6 % of the grade 4 patients who had surgery for various indications (p < 0.001).


Esophagogastric opening estimated by endoscopic grading of the GEFV was strongly correlated with surgery rate in GERD patients. In particular, patients with grade 4 valves showed the highest rates of erosive esophagitis and axial hiatal hernia and frequently underwent surgery for either failed medical management or disease complications.


Gastroesophageal flap valve Gastroesophageal reflux disease Surgery 



Dr. H. A. Kayaoglu has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Hill LD, Kozarek RA, Kraemer SJ, Aye RW, Mercer CD, Low DE, Pope CE II (1996) The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations. Gastrointest Endosc 44:541–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hill LD, Kozarek RA (1999) The gastroesophageal flap valve. J Clin Gastroenterol 28:194–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Contractor QQ, Akhtar SS, Contractor TQ (1999) Endoscopic esophagitis and gastroesophageal flap valve. J Clin Gastroenterol 28:233–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zaninotto G, DeMeester TR, Schwizer W, Johansson KE, Cheng SC (1988) The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease. Am J Surg 155:104–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Banki F, Mason RJ, Hagen JA, Bremner CG, Streets CG, Peters JH, DeMeester TR (2001) The crura and crura-sphincter pressure dynamics in patients with isolated upright and isolated supine reflux. Am Surg 67:1150–1156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mittal RK, Balaban DH (1997) The esophagogastric junction. N Engl J Med 336:924–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thor KB, Hill LD, Mercer DD, Kozarek RD (1987) Reappraisal of the flap valve mechanism in the gastroesophageal junction: a study of a new valvuloplasty procedure in cadavers. Acta Chir Scand 153:25–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Öberg S, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Lord RV, Johansson J, Crookes PF, Bremner CG (1999) Endoscopic grading of the gastroesophageal valve in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Surg Endosc 13:1184–1188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim GH, Song GA, Kim TO, Jo HJ, Kim do H, Heo J, Cho M, Kang DH (2008) Endoscopic grading of gastroesophageal flap valve and atrophic gastritis is helpful to predict gastroesophageal reflux. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:208–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin BR, Wong JM, Chang MC, Liao CC, Yang PM, Jeng JH, Liao WR, Wang TH (2006) Abnormal gastroesophageal flap valve is highly associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease among subjects undergoing routine endoscopy in Taiwan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:556–562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soll AH, Fass R (1999) Gastroesophageal reflux: practical management of a common, challenging disorder. Clin Cornerstone 1:1–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shimazu T, Matsui T, Furukawa K, Oshige K, Mitsuyasu T, Kiyomizu A, Ueki T, Yao T (2005) A prospective study of the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and confounding factors. J Gastroenterol 40:866–872PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vakil N, Shaw M, Kirby R (2003) Clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication in a US community. Am J Med 114:1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spechler SJ (1992) Comparison of medical and surgical therapy for complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease in veterans. The Department of Veterans Affairs Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group. N Engl J Med 326:786–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mason RJ, DeMeester TR, Lund RJ, Peters JH, Crookes P, Ritter M, Gadenstätter M, Hagen JA (1997) Nissen fundoplication prevents shortening of the sphincter during gastric distention. Arch Surg 132:719–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xirouchakis E, Kamberoglou D, Kalos D, Zambeli E, Doulgeroglou V, Tzias V (2009) The effect of gastroesophageal flap valve appearance on the management of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci 54:328–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine, Department of General SurgeryGaziosmanpasa UniversityTokatTurkey

Personalised recommendations