Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 487–493 | Cite as

Clinical outcomes for patients with perforations during endoscopic submucosal dissection of laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum

  • Jung Yoon Yoon
  • Jeong Hwan KimEmail author
  • Ji Young Lee
  • Sung Noh Hong
  • Sun-Young Lee
  • In-Kyung Sung
  • Hyung Seok Park
  • Chan Sup Shim
  • Hye Seung Han
Article

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal neoplasms is not widely performed because of the high risk of perforation. Perforations are divided into macroperforations and microperforations. Currently, there is a limited amount of clinical data on the outcome of patients with these types of perforations during colonic ESD. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome of patients who sustained colon perforations during ESD. We also compared the clinical outcome of patients with microperforations and those with macroperforations.

Methods

This study enrolled 101 patients with colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LST) who underwent ESD. We retrospectively reviewed their medical records, including patient demographic data and the clinical, endoscopic, and pathologic features. In the cases where perforation had occurred, the course of hospital treatment was analyzed. All ESD-related perforations were divided into macroperforations and microperforations. A macroperforation was defined as a gross perforation that occurred during an ESD procedure and a microperforation was defined by free air visible on X-rays after the procedure.

Results

Of the 101 enrolled patients, 9 (8.9 %) developed perforations. The most common tumor morphology was nongranular-type LST (5 of 9 cases, 55.6 %) based on endoscopic examination. Five patients had microperforations and four had macroperforations. All macroperforations were closed primarily by endoclips during ESD. The endoscopic characteristics did not differ between the groups. However, the length of hospital stay and the mean duration of NPO and antibiotic treatments were longer for microperforation patients. All patients had conservative nonsurgical management such as fasting, intravenous antibiotics, and nasogastric tube drainage.

Conclusions

The clinical complications for microperforation patients were worse than those for macroperforation patients. However, the clinical prognoses of patients with perforations that occur during colonic ESD are favorable.

Keywords

Colorectal laterally spreading tumor Endoscopic submucosal dissection Macroperforation Microperforation Perforation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Konkuk University in 2012.

Disclosures

Jung Yoon Yoon, Jeong Hwan Kim, Ji Young Lee, Sung Noh Hong, Sun-Young Lee, In-Kyung Sung, Hyung Seok Park, Chan Sup Shim, and Hye Seung Han have no conflicts or interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Kitajima K, Fujimori T, Fujii S, Takeda J, Ohkura Y, Kawamata H, Kumamoto T, Ishiguro S, Kato Y, Shimoda T, Iwashita A, Ajioka Y, Watanabe H, Watanabe T, Muto T, Nagasako K (2004) Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study. J Gastroenterol 39:534–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yoshida N, Yagi N, Naito Y, Yoshikawa T (2010) Safe procedure in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors focused on preventing complications. World J Gastroenterol 16:1688–1695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Iseki K, Narahara H, Uedo N, Sakai N, Ishikawa H, Otani T, Ishiguro S (2000) Endoscopic piecemeal resection with submucosal saline injection of large sessile colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 51:697–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tanaka S, Haruma K, Oka S, Takahashi R, Kunihiro M, Kitadai Y, Yoshihara M, Shimamoto F, Chayama K (2001) Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm. Gastrointest Endosc 54:62–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hurlstone DP, Sanders DS, Cross SS, Adam I, Shorthouse AJ, Brown S, Drew K, Lobo AJ (2004) Colonoscopic resection of lateral spreading tumours: a prospective analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut 53:1334–1339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, Fukunaga S, Sakamoto T, Uraoka T, Nakajima T, Ikehara H, Fu KI, Itoi T, Fujii T (2010) Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 24:343–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20:CD003145Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Platell C (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery. ANZ J Surg 79:275–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chung IK, Lee JH, Lee SH, Kim SJ, Cho JY, Cho WY, Hwangbo Y, Keum BR, Park JJ, Chun HJ, Kim HJ, Kim JJ, Ji SR, Seol SY (2009) Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD study group multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 69:1228–1235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soetikno R, Kaltenbach T, Yeh R, Gotoda T (2005) Endoscopic mucosal resection for early cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Oncol 23:4490–4498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, Goto O, Ono S, Hirano K, Minatsuki C, Yamamichi N, Koike K (2010) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms. Endoscopy 42:723–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tanaka S, Tamegai Y, Tsuda S, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano HO (2010) Multicenter questionnaire survey on the current situation of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in Japan. Dig Endosc 22(Suppl 1):S2–S8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim ES, Cho KB, Park KS, Lee KI, Jang BK, Chung WJ, Hwang JS (2011) Factors predictive of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colorectal tumors. Endoscopy 43:573–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jeon SW, Jung MK, Kim SK, Cho KB, Park KS, Park CK, Kwon JG, Jung JT, Kim EY, Kim TN, Jang BI, Yang CH (2010) Clinical outcomes for perforations during endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with gastric lesions. Surg Endosc 24:911–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (1983) General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. Part I. Clinical classification. Jpn J Surg 13:557–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I, Hirata M, Mouri R, Kanao H, Yoshida S, Chayama K (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc 66:100–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N, Hinohara C, Oshima T, Kogure E, Liu Y, Uemura N, Saito K (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors. Endoscopy 39:418–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Isomoto H, Nishiyama H, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ishii H, Ikeda K, Ohnita K, Nakao K, Kohno S, Shikuwa S (2009) Clinicopathological factors associated with clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms. Endoscopy 41:679–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jung Yoon Yoon
    • 1
  • Jeong Hwan Kim
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ji Young Lee
    • 1
  • Sung Noh Hong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sun-Young Lee
    • 1
  • In-Kyung Sung
    • 1
  • Hyung Seok Park
    • 1
  • Chan Sup Shim
    • 1
  • Hye Seung Han
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine, Digestive Disease Center, Konkuk University Medical CenterKonkuk University School of MedicineGwangjin-gu, SeoulKorea
  2. 2.Research Institute of Biomedical Science, Medical Immunology Center, Konkuk University Medical CenterKonkuk University School of MedicineSeoulKorea
  3. 3.Department of Pathology, Konkuk University Medical CenterKonkuk University School of MedicineSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations