Robot-assisted common bile duct exploration as an option for complex choledocholithiasis
- 251 Downloads
This study aimed to describe the authors’ early experience with robot-assisted common bile duct exploration (CBDE) for choledocholithiasis refractory to endoscopic therapy and to compare the outcomes with those of equivalent patients undergoing an open technique.
At our institution, 55 CBDEs were performed between 2005 and 2010. All 19 robot-assisted cases were unselected elective referrals for stone disease. Of 36 open procedures, emergency cases and exploration not for stone disease were excluded, leaving 18 cases for analysis. Cases were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. A P value of 0.05 denoted statistical significance.
The patients did not differ in terms of demography, comorbidity, or presenting symptoms. The reasons for endoscopic failure in both groups were similar. The mean operating time was longer for robot-assisted surgery (220 ± 41.26 min) than for open surgery (169 ± 65.81 min) (P = 0.01), but the median hospital stay was shorter (4 vs 11 days; P = 0.02). Four conversions to open surgery (21 %) were performed due to severe adhesions. The two groups did not differ statistically in terms of T-tube usage (74 vs 61 %; P = 0.414). One death occurred in the robotic group and two in the open cohort. Postoperative complications occurred in seven robotic and ten open cases (P = 0.402). They were mainly respiratory complications in the robot-assisted group, whereas they were cardiac and wound-related complications in the open group. Two of the converted cases had complications similar to those of the open group. Postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for retained stones was performed in one open case and three robotic cases.
Robot-assisted CBDE offers some benefit when ERCP fails. Ideal case selection may enhance success.
KeywordsRobotic-assisted surgery Common bile duct exploration Cholecystectomy Choledocholithiasis Common bile duct stones Minimally invasive surgery
Nawar A. Alkhamesi, Ward T. Davies, R. Fiona Pinto, and Christopher M. Schlachta have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 4.Ozcan N, Kahriman G, Mavili E (2012) Percutaneous transhepatic removal of bile duct stones: results of 261 patients. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 35(3):621–627Google Scholar
- 13.Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD003327Google Scholar