Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 95–103 | Cite as

Short-term clinical outcomes for 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: improvement with surgical experience

  • Song C. Kim
  • Ki B. Song
  • Yong S. Jung
  • Young H. Kim
  • Do H. Park
  • Sang S. Lee
  • Dong W. Seo
  • Sung K. Lee
  • Myung H. Kim
  • Kwang M. Park
  • Young J. Lee
Article

Abstract

Background

Few reports describe the use of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPPPD) in centers with experience using this technique. In addition, the clinical outcomes of this procedure remain undetermined.

Methods

In the current study, 100 patients with benign or malignant lesions in the pancreatic head underwent LPPPD between May 2007 and December 2011. The overall clinical outcomes and changes in these outcomes during the surgeon learning period were analyzed to assess the feasibility and safety of this procedure.

Results

Pathologic examination of the pancreas confirmed intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms in 37 patients, solid pseudopapillary tumors in 17 patients, neuroendocrine tumors in 15 patients, serous cystic neoplasms in seven patients, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas in seven patients, ampulla of Vater tumors and duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors in five patients, and other disease in seven patients. The median operative time was 7.9 h, which decreased with accumulating experience of the surgeon using this procedure, from 9.8 h for the first 33 cases to 6.6 h for the last 34 cases. Complications developed in 25 % of the patients, including six cases (6 %) with significant pancreatic fistula [International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) grade B]. The complication rate decreased from 33.3 % for the first 33 cases to 17.6 % for the last 34 cases. The mean hospital stay was 14 days, which also decreased from 20.4 days for the first 33 cases to 11.5 days for the last 34 cases. For the 12 patients in the study cohort with invasive malignant disease, the median tumor size was 2.8 cm, and the median number of lymph nodes harvested was 13. All the patients had margin-negative R0 resections.

Conclusion

The LPPPD procedure is technically safe and feasible, with an acceptable rate of morbidity and other clinical outcomes for benign and malignant diseases. Clinical outcomes can be improved once a learning curve has been overcome.

Keywords

Laparoscopic surgery Pancreatic neoplasm Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy 

Notes

Disclosures

Song C. Kim, Ki B. Song, Yong S. Jung, Young H. Kim, Do H. Park, Sang S. Lee, Dong W. Seo, Sung K. Lee, Myung H. Kim, Kwang M. Park, and Young J. Lee have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Baca I, Klempa I, Gotzen V (1994) Laparoscopic pancreatocystojejunostomy without entero-entero-anastomosis. Chirurg 65:378–381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brune IB, Schonleben K (1992) Laparoscopic side-to-side gastrojejunostomy. Chirurg 63:577–580PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cuschieri SA, Jakimowicz JJ, Stultiens G (1998) Laparoscopic infracolic approach for complications of acute pancreatitis. Semin Laparosc Surg 5:189–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fletcher DR, Jones RM (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystjejunostomy as palliation for obstructive jaundice in inoperable carcinoma of pancreas. Surg Endosc 6:147–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shimi S, Banting S, Cuschieri A (1992) Laparoscopy in the management of pancreatic cancer: endoscopic cholecystojejunostomy for advanced disease. Br J Surg 79:317–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Warshaw AL, Tepper JE, Shipley WU (1986) Laparoscopy in the staging and planning of therapy for pancreatic cancer. Am J Sur 151:76–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Halpin VJ, Eagon JC, Brunt LM, Frisella MM, Matthews BD (2007) Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 21:579–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tang CN, Tsui KK, Ha JPY, Wong DCT, Li MKW (2007) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study. Hepatogastroenterol 54:265–271Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Teh SH, Tseng D, Sheppard BC (2007) Laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection for benign pancreatic disease. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1120–1125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Velanovich V (2006) Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 10:95–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim SC, Park KT, Hwang JW, Shin HC, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Han DJ (2008) Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection in a single institution. Surg Endosc 22:2261–2268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gagner M, Pomp A (1997) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg 1:20–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cuschieri A (1994) Laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas. J R Coll Surg Edinb 39:178–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kimura Y, Hirata K, Mukaiya M, Mizuguchi T, Koito K, Katsuramaki T (2005) Hand-assisted laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreas head disease. Am J Surg 189:734–737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ammori BJ (2004) Laparoscopic hand-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: initial UK experience. Surg Endosc 18:717–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Masson B, Sa-cunha A, Laurent C (2003) Laparoscopic pancreatectomy: report of 22 cases. Ann Chir 128:452–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Staudacher C, Orsenigo E, Baccari P, Palo SD, Crippa S (2005) Laparoscopic assisted duodenopancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 19:352–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajapandian S, Madhankumar MV (2007) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 205:222–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2006) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg Endosc 20:1045–1050PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zureikat AH, Breaux JA, Steel JL, Hughes SJ (2011) Can laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy be safely implemented? J Gastrointest Surg 15:1151–1157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic lancreaticoduodenectomy; feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145:19–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Shah G, Addeo P, Caravaglios G, Coratti A (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopicpancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24:1646–1657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Song C. Kim
    • 1
  • Ki B. Song
    • 1
  • Yong S. Jung
    • 1
  • Young H. Kim
    • 1
  • Do H. Park
    • 2
  • Sang S. Lee
    • 2
  • Dong W. Seo
    • 2
  • Sung K. Lee
    • 1
  • Myung H. Kim
    • 2
  • Kwang M. Park
    • 1
  • Young J. Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical CenterSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of GastroenterologyUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical CenterSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations