Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 12, pp 3486–3494 | Cite as

Significant transfer of surgical skills obtained with an advanced laparoscopic training program to a laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy in a live porcine model: feasibility of learning advanced laparoscopy in a general surgery residency

  • Julián Varas
  • Ricardo Mejía
  • Arnoldo Riquelme
  • Felipe Maluenda
  • Erwin Buckel
  • José Salinas
  • Jorge Martínez
  • Rajesh Aggarwal
  • Nicolás Jarufe
  • Camilo Boza
Article

Abstract

Background

Simulation may provide a solution to acquire advanced laparoscopic skills, thereby completing the curriculum of residency programs in general surgery. This study was designed to present an advanced simulation-training program and to assess the transfer of skills to a live porcine model.

Methods

First-year residents were assessed in a 14-session advanced laparoscopic training program followed by performing a jejunojejunostomy in a live porcine model. Previous and after training assessments at the bench model were compared to a single performance of six expert laparoscopic surgeons. Results obtained by trainees at the porcine model assessment were compared to those of 11 general surgeons without any laparoscopic lab-simulation training and 6 expert laparoscopic surgeons. In all assessments, global and specific OSATS scores, operative time, and covered path length of hands were registered.

Results

Twenty-five residents improved significantly their global and specific OSATS score median at the bench model [7 (range, 6–11) vs. 23 (range, 21–24); p < 0.05 and 7 (range, 4–8) vs. 18 (range, 18–19); p < 0.05, respectively] and obtained significantly better scores on the porcine model compared with general surgeons with no lab-simulation training [21 (range, 20.5–21) vs. 8 (range, 12–14); p < 0.05]. The results were comparable to those achieved by expert certificated bariatric surgeons. Total path lengths registered for trainees were more efficient post-training and significantly lower compared with general surgeons on the porcine model [7 (range, 6–11) vs. 23 (range, 21–24); p < 0.05] with no statistical difference compared with experts.

Conclusions

Trainees significantly improved their advanced laparoscopic skills to a level compared with expert surgeons. More importantly, these acquired skills were transferred to a more complex live model.

Keywords

Training/courses Simulation Advanced laparoscopy Education Laparoscopic training Surgery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Department of Digestive Surgery financed this work and it was partially supported by grants of the National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT), FONDECYT No. 1100436 to A.R. The authors thank Oslando Padilla for his support with the statistical analysis of the data.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

References

  1. 1.
    Wong JA, Matsumoto ED (2008) Primer: cognitive motor learning for teaching surgical skill—how are surgical skills taught and assessed? Nat Clin Pract Urol 5:47–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M, Hananel D, Heydenburg M, Issenberg B, MacAulay C, Mancini ME, Morimoto T, Soper N, Ziv A, Reznick R (2010) Training and simulation for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 19(Suppl 2):i34–i43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wanzel KR, Ward M, Reznick RK (2002) Teaching the surgical craft: from selection to certification. Curr Probl Surg 39:573–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aggarwal R, Darzi A (2006) Technical-skills training in the 21st century. N Engl J Med 355:2695–2696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harrington D, Roye G, Ryder B, Miner T, Richardson P, Cioffi W (2007) A time-cost analysis of teaching a laparoscopic entero-enterostomy. J Surg Educ 64:342–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aggarwal R, Darzi A (2011) Simulation to enhance patient safety: why aren’t we there yet? Chest 140:854–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grantcharov TP, Funch-Jensen P (2009) Can everyone achieve proficiency with the laparoscopic technique? Learning curve patterns in technical skills acquisition. Am J Surg 197:447–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaffer A, Bednarz B, Challacombe B, Sriprasad S (2009) The assessment of surgical competency in the UK. Int J Surg 7:12–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reznick RK, MacRae H (2006) Teaching surgical skills—changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355:2664–2669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scott DJ, Ritter EM, Tesfay ST, Pimentel EA, Nagji A, Fried GM (2008) Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training. Surg Endosc 22:1887–1893PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hogle NJ, Widmann WD, Ude AO, Hardy MA, Fowler DL (2008) Does training novices to criteria and does rapid acquisition of skills on laparoscopic simulators have predictive validity or are we just playing video games? J Surg Educ 65:431–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Dongen KW, Ahlberg G, Bonavina L, Carter FJ, Grantcharov TP, Hyltander A, Schijven MP, Stefani A, van der Zee DC, Broeders IA (2011) European consensus on a competency-based virtual reality training program for basic endoscopic surgical psychomotor skills. Surg Endosc 25:166–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lewis T, Aggarwal R, Sugden C, Darzi A (2011) The adoption of advanced surgical techniques: are surgical masterclasses enough? Am J Surg (epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aggarwal R, Boza C, Hance J, Leong J, Lacy A, Darzi A (2007) Skills acquisition for laparoscopic gastric bypass in the training laboratory: an innovative approach. Obes Surg 17:19–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, Brown M (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Nortwick SS, Lendvay TS, Jensen AR, Wright AS, Horvath KD, Kim S (2010) Methodologies for establishing validity in surgical simulation studies. Surgery 147:622–630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carlson J, Tomkowiak J, Knott P (2010) Simulation-based examinations in physician assistant education: a comparison of two standard-setting methods. J Phys Assist Educ 21:7–14Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aggarwal R, Dosis A, Bello F, Darzi A (2006) Motion tracking systems for assessment of surgical skill. Surg Endosc 21:339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Datta V, Mackay S, Mandalia M, Darzi A (2001) The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. J Am Coll Surg 193:479–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Norcini J, Burch V (2007) Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 29:855–871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hirsch ED J (1993) The core knowledge curriculum—what’s behind its success? Educational Leadership 50(58) 23–25, 27–30 [EJ 462 453]Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T, Davies OG (2000) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients. Arch Surg 135:1029–1033 discussion 1033–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oropesa I, Sanchez-Gonzalez P, Lamata P, Chmarra MK, Pagador JB, Sanchez-Margallo JA, Sanchez-Margallo FM, Gomez EJ (2011) Methods and tools for objective assessment of psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res 171:e81–e95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reznick RK, Smee S, Baumber JS, Cohen R, Rothman A, Blackmore D, Berard M (1993) Guidelines for estimating the real cost of an objective structured clinical examination. Acad Med 68:513–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Darzi A, Mackay S (2001) Assessment of surgical competence. Qual Health Care 10(Suppl 2):ii64–ii69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miller A, Archer J (2010) Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors’ education and performance a: systematic review. BMJ 341:c5064PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kirkpatrick DL (1994) Evaluating training programs: the four levels. Berrett-Koehler, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kirkpatrick D (1996) Revisiting Kirkpatrick’s four-level model, part of Great Ideas Revisited series in Training & Development, pp 54–59Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sturm LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH, Cregan P, Hewett PJ, Maddern GJ (2008) A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg 248:166–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hyltander A, Liljegren E, Rhodin PH, Lonroth H (2002) The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room. Surg Endosc 16:1324–1328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julián Varas
    • 1
  • Ricardo Mejía
    • 1
  • Arnoldo Riquelme
    • 2
  • Felipe Maluenda
    • 1
  • Erwin Buckel
    • 1
  • José Salinas
    • 1
  • Jorge Martínez
    • 1
  • Rajesh Aggarwal
    • 3
  • Nicolás Jarufe
    • 1
  • Camilo Boza
    • 1
  1. 1.Experimental Surgery Simulation Center, Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clínico, Faculty of MedicinePontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Department of Gastroenterology and Centre for Medical Education, Faculty of MedicinePontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
  3. 3.Department of Biosurgery and Surgical TechnologyImperial CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations