Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 11, pp 3180–3185 | Cite as

High incidence of symptomatic incisional hernia after midline extraction in laparoscopic colon resection

  • Lawrence Lee
  • Benjamin Mappin-Kasirer
  • Alexander Sender Liberman
  • Barry Stein
  • Patrick Charlebois
  • Melina Vassiliou
  • Gerald M. Fried
  • Liane S. Feldman



The incidence of incisional hernia has not decreased despite the use of laparoscopy for colon resections. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the incision used for specimen extraction on the incidence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic colectomy.


Patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy without stoma at a single university tertiary-care centre from 2003 to 2009 were identified from an operating room database. Patients were contacted by telephone for participation, and underwent physical examination ± ultrasonography for incisional hernia at the specimen extraction site and completed the Body Image Questionnaire. Specimen extraction incisions were classified into midline, transverse and Pfannenstiel groups.


Out of a total of 251 patients, 99 patients agreed to participate (68 midline, 7 transverse, 24 Pfannenstiel), while 73 patients refused consent and 79 patients could not be contacted. Patients who refused consent were older (69.8 vs 62.4 years, p = 0.001) but otherwise were similar to participants with respect to gender, malignant disease, postoperative complications and extraction site. Mean length of follow-up was 37.0 months. The overall incidence of incisional hernia was 21% (21/99), being 29 % (20/68) after midline incision compared with 14 % (1/7) after transverse and 0 % (0/24) after Pfannenstiel incisions (p = 0.002). Of patients with incisional hernia, 47 % (10/21) were symptomatic. Patients with incisional hernia had lower cosmetic score (14.4 vs 17.7, p = 0.02) compared with those without, but there was no difference in body image score. There were no differences in body image or cosmesis between the three incisions.


There is a high incidence of symptomatic incisional hernia after midline specimen extraction in laparoscopic colectomy, which negatively impacts cosmesis. The risk of hernia may be lower with the use of a transverse or Pfannenstiel incision for specimen extraction.


Bowel Hernia 



The authors thank Dr. Chao Li and Pepa Kaneva, MSc, for their help in the acquisition and analysis of the data.


The Steinberg Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Covidien Canada. Dr. Liberman is a paid speaker and a surgical proctor for Covidien. Dr. Charlebois is on the advisory board for Merck. Dr. Fried receives research and fellowship funding from Covidien and research support from Olympus. Dr. Feldman receives research and fellowship funding from Covidien and research support from Ethicon. Drs. Lee, Stein, Vassiliou, and Mr. Mappin-Kasirer have no conflicts of interests or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003145Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Civelli V, Di Carlo V (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients: long-term complications, quality of life, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2217–2223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Veljkovic R, Protic M, Gluhovic A, Potic Z, Milosevic Z, Stojadinovic A (2010) Prospective clinical trial of factors predicting the early development of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 210:210–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van’t Riet M, Vrijland WW, Lange JF, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ (2002) Mesh repair of incisional hernia: comparison of laparoscopic and open repair. Eur J Surg 168:684–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2009) Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 144:1056–1059PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conze J, Kingsnorth AN, Flament JB, Simmermacher R, Arlt G, Langer C, Schippers E, Hartley M, Schumpelick V (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:1488–1493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halm JA, Lip H, Schmitz PI, Jeekel J (2009) Incisional hernia after upper abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial of midline versus transverse incision. Hernia 13:275–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singh R, Omiccioli A, Hegge S, McKinley C (2008) Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates? Surg Endosc 22:2596–2600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control 20:271–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezand RA, Ringers J, Griffioen G, Bemelman WA (1998) Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc 12:1334–1340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003432Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Winslow ER, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, Brunt LM (2002) Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy. Surg Endosc 16:1420–1425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seiler CM, Deckert A, Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Weigand MA, Victor N, Buchler MW (2009) Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227). Ann Surg 249:913–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Almenara R, Cabrer C, de Lacy AM, Sust M, Taura P, Fuster J, Grande L, Pera M, Sentis J et al (1988) Subcostal incision versus midline laparotomy in gallstone surgery: a prospective and randomized trial. Br J Surg 75:473–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Greenall MJ, Evans M, Pollock AV (1980) Midline or transverse laparotomy? A random controlled clinical trial. Part I: influence on healing. Br J Surg 67:188–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Israelsson LA, Jonsson T (1996) Incisional hernia after midline laparotomy: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 162:125–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sookhai S, Redmond HP, Deasy JM (1999) Impervious wound-edge protector to reduce postoperative wound infection: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 353:1585PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kercher KW, Nguyen TH, Harold KL, Poplin ME, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2004) Plastic wound protectors do not affect wound infection rates following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Surg Endosc 18:148–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gomez R, Hidalgo M, Marques E, Marin L, Loinaz C, Gonzalez I, Garcia I, Moreno E (2001) Incidence and predisposing factors for incisional hernia in patients with liver transplantation. Hernia 5:172–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T (2000) The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 231:436–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van’t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J (2002) Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg 89:1350–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van’t Riet M, De Vos Van Steenwijk PJ, Bonjer HJ, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J (2004) Incisional hernia after repair of wound dehiscence: incidence and risk factors. Am Surg 70:281–286Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Llaguna OH, Avgerinos DV, Lugo JZ, Matatov T, Abbadessa B, Martz JE, Leitman IM (2010) Incidence and risk factors for the development of incisional hernia following elective laparoscopic versus open colon resections. Am J Surg 200:265–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Desouza A, Domajnko B, Park J, Marecik S, Prasad L, Abcarian H (2010) Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: What is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 24:1031–1036Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Whistance RN, Gilbert R, Fayers P, Longman RJ, Pullyblank A, Thomas M, Blazeby JM (2010) Assessment of body image in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:369–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scarpa M, Erroi F, Ruffolo C, Mollica E, Polese L, Pozza G, Norberto L, D’Amico DF, Angriman I (2009) Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer: quality of life, body image, cosmesis, and functional results. Surg Endosc 23:577–582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, Ostermann S, Morel P (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence Lee
    • 1
  • Benjamin Mappin-Kasirer
    • 1
  • Alexander Sender Liberman
    • 1
  • Barry Stein
    • 1
  • Patrick Charlebois
    • 1
  • Melina Vassiliou
    • 1
  • Gerald M. Fried
    • 1
  • Liane S. Feldman
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and InnovationMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.McGill University Health CentreMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations