Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 2729–2734 | Cite as

Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial

  • Jensen T. C. Poon
  • Chi-Wai Cheung
  • Joe K. M. Fan
  • Oswen S. H. Lo
  • Wai-Lun Law



Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) is a newly developed procedure with the benefit of better cosmetic outcome and potentially reduced wound pain compared with conventionally laparoscopic colectomy (CLC). However, the application of SILC requires careful evaluation to prove its benefit and safety. This randomized, controlled study compared the operative outcome of patients who underwent SILC and CLC.


Patients who had small cancer (<4 cm) or adenomatous polyp requiring colectomy were randomized to have SILC or CLC. The patients were blinded to the procedures and the postoperative pain was used as the primary outcome measure. All patients had patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine after the operation and the nominal rating score on days 1–3 and day 14 were recorded by research staff, who did not known the types of operations. Other operative outcomes of the two groups of patients also were recorded prospectively and compared.


There were 25 patients in each group. The patients’ demographics, tumor characteristics, operating time, blood loss, complication rate, number of lymph nodes harvested, and resection margin have no statistically significant difference between the two groups. There was no operative mortality in both groups. The SILC group had consistently lower median pain score than CLC group in the whole postoperative course and the difference was statistically significant on day 1 (0 (0–5) vs. day 3 (0–6) respectively; p = 0.002) and day 2 (0 (0–3) vs. 2 (0–8) respectively; p = 0.014). The median hospital stay in the SILC group also was shorter the CLC group.


In a selected group of patients with small tumor and good operative risk, SILC is a safe alternative to CLC. Single-port laparoscopic colectomy also is associated with the benefits of less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay than CLC.


Colorectal Cancer 



Dr. Poon, Dr. Cheung, Dr. Fan, Dr. Lo, and Professor Law have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Adair J, Gromski MA, Lim RB, Nagle D (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1549–1554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boone BA, Wagner P, Ganchuk E, Evans L, Zeh HJ, Bartlett DL, Holtzman MP (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy in an unselected patient population. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2076-4 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1013–1016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Champagne BJ, Lee EC, Leblanc F, Stein SL, Delaney CP (2011) Single-incision vs straight laparoscopic segmental colectomy: a case-controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:183–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS, Nagle DA, Young-Fadok TM, Lee EC, Delaney CP (2012) Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg 255:66–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen WT, Chang SC, Chiang HC, Lo WY, Jeng LB, Wu C, Ke TW (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc 25:1887–1892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Mereu A, Binda B, Brachini G, Trombetta S (2011) Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study. Am J Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.09.005 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katsuno G, Fukunaga M, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Ouchi M, Hirasaki Y (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: early experience with 31 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 54:705–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim SJ, Ryu GO, Choi BJ, Kim JG, Lee KJ, Lee SC, Oh ST (2011) The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 254:933–940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Law WL, Fan JK, Poon JT (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: early experience. Dis Colon Rectum 53:284–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu CC, Lin SE, Chung KC, Rau KM (2011) Comparison of clinical outcome of single incision laparoscopic surgery using a simplified access system with conventional laparoscopic surgery for malignant colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02825.x Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marcello PW (2011) Single incision laparoscopic colectomy: boutique surgery or the new standard? Dis Colon Rectum 54:660–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McNally ME, Todd MB, Brown KM (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for malignant disease. Surg Endosc 25:3559–3565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Papaconstantinou HT, Thomas JS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: assessment of oncologic resection and short-term outcomes in a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopy. Surgery 150:820–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Papaconstantinou HT, Sharp N, Thomas JS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg 213:72–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poon JT, Law WL, Fan JK, Lo OS (2009) Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. World J Surg 33:2177–2182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poon JT, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL (2011) Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:71–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Nieto J, Patel CB, Miller S, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a case-matched series. Surg Endosc 26:96–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP (2008) Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:823–826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Waters JA, Guzman MJ, Fajardo AD, Selzer DJ, Wiebke EA, Robb BW, George VV (2010) Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1467–1472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jensen T. C. Poon
    • 1
  • Chi-Wai Cheung
    • 2
  • Joe K. M. Fan
    • 1
  • Oswen S. H. Lo
    • 1
  • Wai-Lun Law
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of SurgeryQueen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiologyQueen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations