Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 2383–2387 | Cite as

Surgical techniques of laparoscopic peritonectomy plus paraaortic lymph node dissection for the treatment of patients with positive lymph node metastasis and peritoneal seeding from rectosigmoid cancer

  • Jin-Tung LiangEmail author
Dynamic Manuscript

Abstract

Background

This multimedia article demonstrates the surgical techniques of laparoscopic pelvic peritonectomy plus aggressive lymph node dissection over the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava for the treatment of rectosigmoid cancer.

Methods

The surgical procedures are detailed in the attached video.

Results

This study enrolled 17 patients. All the patients successfully underwent surgery by the described surgical technique and had a zero conversion rate, an acceptable operation time (median 284 min, range 240–360 min), and moderate blood loss (median 294 ml, range 140–740 ml) through five small wounds (four 1-cm wounds for 5–12-mm abdominal ports and one 5-cm wound for tumor retrieval). The number of dissected lymph nodes was adequate (median 44, range 32–68). The operative complications represented 29.4% of all cases including anastomotic leakage in two cases, wound infection in two cases, and urinary retention followed by repeated urinary tract infection in one case. The patients had quick functional recovery, as evaluated by the length of the postoperative ileus (median 72 h, range 36–144 h), the hospital stay (median 14 days, range 12–28 days), and the degree of postoperative pain (visual analog scale median 4.0, range 3–6).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgery can be performed safely for rectosigmoid cancer patients with pelvic peritoneal seeding and extensive abdominal paraaortic lymph node metastases requiring an extended abdomino-iliac lymphadenectomy plus curative pelvic peritonectomy.

Keywords

Laparoscopic surgery Paraaortic lymph node dissection Peritonectomy Rectal cancer 

Notes

Disclosure

Jin-Tung Liang has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 53143 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Garofalo A, Valle M (2009) Laparoscopy in the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer J 15:190–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2009) Complete peritonectomy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent rectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis. World J Gastroenterol 14(15):756–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chua TC, Morris DL, Esquivel J (2010) Impact of the peritoneal surface disease severity score on survival in patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing complete cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1330–1336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chua TC, Yan TD, Saxena A, Morris DL (2009) Should the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis by cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy still be regarded as a highly morbid procedure? A systematic review of morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 249:900–907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Verwaal VJ, van Ruth S, de Bree E, van Slooten GW, van Tinteren H, Boot H, Zoetmulder F (2003) Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:3737–3743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yan TD, Black D, Savady R, Sugarbaker PH (2006) Systematic review on the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24:4011–4019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sugarbaker PH (2007) Peritoneum as the first-line of defense in carcinomatosis. J Surg Oncol 95:93–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, Lee PH, Sun CT (2007) Oncologic results of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for male sigmoid and upper rectal cancer with clinically positive lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1980–1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sekimoto M, Takemasa I, Mizushima T, Ikeda M, Yamamoto H, Doki Y, Mori M (2011) Laparoscopic lymph node dissection around the inferior mesenteric artery with preservation of the left colic artery. Surg Endosc 25:861–866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Esquivel J, Averbach A, Chua TC (2011) Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with limited peritoneal surface malignancies: feasibility, morbidity, and outcome in an early experience. Ann Surg 253:764–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Esquivel J, Chua TC, Stojadinovic A, Melero JT, Levine EA, Gutman M, Howard R, Piso P, Nissan A, Gomez-Portilla A, Gonzalez-Bayon L, Gonzalez-Moreno S, Shen P, Stewart JH, Sugarbaker PH, Barone RM, Hoefer R, Morris DL, Sardi A, Sticca RP (2010) Accuracy and clinical relevance of computed tomography scan interpretation of peritoneal cancer index in colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis: a multi-institutional study. J Surg Oncol 102:565–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, Lee PH, Sun CT (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for male rectosigmoid cancer with clinically positive lymph nodes. Surg Endosc 22:2514–2517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dromain C, Leboulleux S, Auperin A, Goere D, Malka D, Lumbroso J, Schumberger M, Sigal R, Elias D (2008) Staging of peritoneal carcinomatosis: enhanced CT vs PET/CT. Abdom Imaging 33:87–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of SurgeryNational Taiwan University Hospital and College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations