Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 7, pp 1898–1902 | Cite as

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments: a 15-year, single-center experience in 317 patients

  • Hidetoshi Wada
  • Taizo Kimura
  • Akihiro Kawabe
  • Masanori Sato
  • Yuichirou Miyaki
  • Junpei Tochikubo
  • Kouji Inamori
  • Norihiko Shiiya
Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is associated with a decrease in postoperative pain, shortened hospital stay, earlier return to normal activity, and decrease in chronic pain. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery performed with needlescopic instruments has more advantages than conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, there are few reports of large-scale laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments (nTAPP). This report reviews our experiences with 352 nTAPP in 317 patients during the 15-year period from April 1996 to April 2011.

Methods

We performed nTAPP as the method of choice in 88.5% of all patients presenting with inguinal hernia. To perform the nTAPP, 3-mm instruments were used. A 5-mm laparoscope was inserted from the umbilicus, and surgical instruments were inserted through 5- and 3-mm trocars. After reduction of the hernia sac and dissection of the preperitoneal space, we placed polyester mesh or polypropylene soft mesh with staple fixation. The peritoneum was closed with 3–0 silk interrupted sutures.

Results

The mean operative time was 102.9 min for unilateral hernias and 155.8 min for bilateral hernias. There was no conversion to open repair. Forty-three patients (13.6%) used postoperative analgesics, and the mean frequency of use was 0.5 times. Regarding intraoperative complications, we observed one bladder injury, but no bowel injuries or major vessel injuries. Postoperative complications occurred in 32 patients (10.1%). One patient with a retained lipoma required reoperation. There was no incidence of chronic pain or mesh infection. The operative time for experienced surgeons (≥20 repairs) was significantly shorter than that of inexperienced surgeons (<20 repairs; P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The nTAPP was a safe and useful technique for inguinal hernia repair. Large prospective, randomized controlled trials will be required to establish the benefit of nTAPP.

Keywords

Inguinal hernia repair Laparoscopic surgery Needlescopic instruments Transabdominal preperitoneal approach 

Notes

Disclosures

Dr. Hidetoshi Wada, Dr. Taizo Kimura, Dr. Akihiro Kawabe, Dr. Masanori Sato, Dr. Yuichirou Miyaki, Dr. Junpei Tochikubo, Dr. Kouji Inamori, and Dr. Norihiko Shiiya have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon MI, Abrams KR (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90(12):1479–1492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM; EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD001785Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs. Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19(5):605–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuhry E, van Veen RN, Langeveld HR, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ (2007) Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review. Surg Endosc 21(2):161–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz A (1998) Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(3):171–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kimura T, Wada H, Yoshida M, Kobayashi T, Kawabe A, Isogaki J, Ban S, Kazui T (1998) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using fine-caliber instruments and polyester mesh. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(4):300–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nyhus LM (1993) Individualization of hernia repair: a new era. Surgery 114(1):1–2PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Filipovic-Cugura J, Kirac I, Kulis T, Jankovic J, Bekavac-Beslin M (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: first case. Surg Endosc 23(4):920–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rahman SH, John BJ (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal mesh hernia repair: a feasible approach. Hernia 14(3):329–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tamme C, Scheidbach H, Hampe C, Schneider C, Köckerling F (2003) Totally extraperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP). Surg Endosc 17(2):190–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hidetoshi Wada
    • 1
  • Taizo Kimura
    • 2
  • Akihiro Kawabe
    • 2
  • Masanori Sato
    • 1
  • Yuichirou Miyaki
    • 1
  • Junpei Tochikubo
    • 1
  • Kouji Inamori
    • 1
  • Norihiko Shiiya
    • 1
  1. 1.First Department of SurgeryHamamatsu University School of MedicineHamamatsu, ShizuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryFujinomiya City General HospitalFujinomiya, ShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations