Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 1637–1641 | Cite as

Minimally invasive esophagectomy with and without gastric ischemic conditioning

  • Ninh T. Nguyen
  • Xuan-Mai T. Nguyen
  • Kevin M. Reavis
  • Christian Elliott
  • Hossein Masoomi
  • Michael J. Stamos



Esophagectomy can be associated with significant morbidity such as leaks and strictures. Preoperative gastric ischemic conditioning is a concept aimed at inducing an ischemic insult to the gastric fundus and cardia prior to esophagectomy, thus leading to improvement of gastric perfusion.


This retrospective study compared outcome data from 81 patients who underwent esophagectomy after laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning with that from 71 patients who underwent esophagectomy without conditioning. Gastric ischemic conditioning consisted of laparoscopic division of the left gastric vessels ± the short gastric vessels. The time interval from gastric ischemic conditioning to esophagectomy ranged from 2 to 75 days. Main outcome measures included demographics, mean time interval between staging and esophagectomy, and the rate of leaks and strictures following esophagectomy.


The two groups were comparable with respect to gender and age. In the gastric ischemic conditioning procedures, there were no conversions; the mean operative time was 57 ± 15 min, the mean length of hospital stay was 1.0 ± 1.1 days, and the rate of postoperative complications was 3.7%. The mean time interval between gastric ischemic conditioning and esophagectomy was 6.0 ± 5.4 days. There were no significant differences in the leak rate (11.1% for conditioning vs. 8.5% without conditioning) or stricture rate (29.6% for conditioning vs. 25.3% without conditioning) between the two groups.


Laparoscopic gastric ischemic conditioning is feasible and safe. However, the use of gastric ischemic conditioning in this study did not alter the clinical rate of postoperative leaks and strictures.


Ligation of left gastric vessels Esophageal cancer Esophagectomy Laparoscopic staging Anastomotic leak Gastric ischemic conditioning 



N. T. Nguyen, X.-M. T. Nguyen, K. M. Reavis, C. Elliott, H. Masoomi, and M. J. Stamos have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Urschel JD (1998) Esophagogastric anastomotic leaks: the importance of gastric ischemia and therapeutic applications of gastric conditioning. J Invest Surg 11(4):245–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Urschel JD, Antkowiak JG, Delacure MD, Takita H (1997) Ischemic conditioning (delay phenomenon) improves esophagogastric anastomotic wound healing in the rate. J Surg Oncol 66:254–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reavis KM, Chang EY, Hunter JG, Jobe BA (2005) Utilization of the delay phenomenon improves blood flow and reduces collagen deposition in esophagogastric anastomoses. Ann Surg 241:736–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akiyama S, Kodera Y, Sekiguchi H, Kasai Y, Kondo K, Ito K, Takagi H (1998) Preoperative embolization therapy for esophageal operation. J Surg Oncol 69:219–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holscher AH, Schneider PM, Gutschow C, Schroder W (2007) Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Ann Surg 245:241–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nguyen NT, Longoria M, Sabio A, Chalifoux S, Lee J, Chang K, Wilson SE (2006) Preoperative laparoscopic ligation of the left gastric vessels in preparation for esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 81:2318–2320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schröder W, Hölscher AH, Bludau M, Vallböhmer D, Bollschweiler E, Gutschow C (2010) Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with and without laparoscopic conditioning of the gastric conduit. World J Surg 34:738–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Veeramootoo D, Shore AC, Shields B, Krishnadas R, Cooper M, Berrisford RG, Wajed SA (2010) Ischemic conditioning shows a time-dependent influence on the fate of the gastric conduit after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 24(5):1126–1131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nguyen NT, Mailey BA, Hinojosa MW, Chang K (2008) Natural orifice management of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagogastrectomy. Surg Innov 15:249–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ninh T. Nguyen
    • 1
  • Xuan-Mai T. Nguyen
    • 1
  • Kevin M. Reavis
    • 1
  • Christian Elliott
    • 1
  • Hossein Masoomi
    • 1
  • Michael J. Stamos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of California Irvine Medical CenterOrangeUSA

Personalised recommendations