Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 1304–1317 | Cite as

Testicular functions, chronic groin pain, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial

  • Anand Narayan Singh
  • Virinder Kumar Bansal
  • Mahesh C. Misra
  • Subodh Kumar
  • S. Rajeshwari
  • Atin Kumar
  • Rajesh Sagar
  • Anand Kumar
Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is still not the gold standard for patients with inguinal hernia. The aim of this study was to compare testicular dysfunction, incidence and factors influencing chronic groin pain, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open mesh repair.

Methods

One hundred twenty patients were studied in a prospective randomized trial. One hundred seventeen patients completed the required follow-up, 60 following laparoscopic repair and 57 following open repair. Testicular functions were assessed by testicular volume, blood flow, and hormones, and quality of life was assessed with Short Form 36 version 2 preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months. Pain was assessed at different time intervals preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results

Preoperative profiles of both groups were well matched. A significant decrease in testicular volume (p  =  0.01) and less improvement in blood flow (p   =   0.048) was seen after open repair. There was also a significant reduction in serum testosterone level (p   =   0.02) with a significant increase in FSH and LH level (p  <  0.001); however, there was no testicular atrophy. Incidence and severity of chronic groin pain were significantly less after laparoscopic repair during normal and strenuous activities, though they were similar to those after open repair during rest after 3 months postoperatively. Age, preoperative pain, pain at 1 week, and open repair were found to be independent risk factors for chronic pain on multivariate analysis. Quality of life was significantly better postoperatively in terms of physical functions, role physical, bodily pain, and general health after laparoscopic repair.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic repair seems favorable in terms of better preservation of testicular functions, lower incidence of acute and chronic groin pain, and significant improvement in quality of life when compared to open repair. Younger age, preoperative pain, pain after 1 week postoperatively, and open mesh repair were found to be significant risk factors for chronic groin pain.

Keywords

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair Open mesh repair Testicular dysfunctions Chronic groin pain Quality of life 

Notes

 

Disclosures

Drs. Anand Narayan Singh, Virinder Kumar Bansal, M. C. Misra, Subodh Kumar, S. Rajeshwari, Atin Kumar, Rajesh Sagar, and Anand Kumar have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Devlin HB (1995) Trends in hernia surgery in the land of Astley Cooper. In: Soper NJ (ed) Problems in general surgery, vol 12. Lippincott Raven, Philadelphia, pp 85–92Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K (2003) Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 362:1561–1571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hernia Trialists Collaboration EU (2002) Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 235:322–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD001785Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reid I, Devlin HE (1994) Testicular atrophy as a consequence of inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 81:91–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zieren J, Beyersdorff D, Beier KM, Müller JM (2001) Sexual function and testicular perfusion after inguinal hernia repair with mesh. Am J Surg 181:204–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H, Database Danish Hernia (2001) Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg 233:1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bozuk M, Schuster R, Stewart D, Hicks K, Greaney G, Waxman K (2003) Disability and chronic pain after open mesh and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am Surg 69:839–841PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laparoscopic The MRC, Group Groin Hernia Trial (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomized comparison. Lancet 354:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19:48–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinee S, Abbou CC, Eypasch E, Caballero MG, Lumsden MA, Millat S, Monson JR, Nilsson G, Pointner R, Schwenk W, Shamiyeh A, Szold A, Targarona E, Ure B, Neugebauer E (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 18:879–897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mathur S, Barlett JRA, Gilkison W, Krishna G (2006) Quality of life assessment in patients with inguinal hernia. ANZ J Surg 76:491–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hope WW, Lincourt AE, Newcomb L, Schmelzer TS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2008) Comparing quality of life outcomes in symptomatic patients undergoing laparoscopic or open ventral hernia repair. J Laparosc Adv Surg Tech 18:567–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gholghesaei M, Langeveld HR, Veldkamp R, Bonjer HJ (2005) Cost and quality of life after endoscopic repair of inguinal hernia vs open tension free repair. Surg Endosc 19:816–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nyhus LM (1993) Individualization of hernia repair: a new era. Surgery 114:102Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kulaylat MN, Dayton MT (2008) Surgical Complications. In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL (eds) Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 331Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McCarthy M Jr, Chang CH, Pickard AS, Giobbie-Hurder A, Price DD, Jonasson O, Gibbs J, Fitzgibbons R, Neumayer L (2005) Visual analogue scales for assessing surgical pain. J Am Coll Surg 201:245–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    International Association for the Study of Pain Subcommittee on Taxonomy (1986) Classification of chronic pain: Description of chronic pain syndromes and definition of pain terms. Pain 3:S1-S226Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am 83:1045–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, Malmstrom J, Andersen FH, Wara P, Juul P, Callesen T, Danish Hernia Database Collaboration (2001) Quality assessment of 26304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective study. Lancet 358:1124–1128Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:188–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gould J (2008) Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 88:1073–1081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Junge K, Binnebösel M, Rosch R, Öttinger A, Stumpf M, Mühlenbruch G, Schumpelick V, Klinge U (2008) Influence of mesh materials on the integrity of the vas deferens following Lichtenstein hernioplasty: an experimental model. Hernia 12:621–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Akbulut G, Serteser M, Yucel A, Degirmenci B, Yilmaz S, Polat C, San O, Dilek ON (2003) Can laparoscopic hernia repair alter function and volume of testis? Randomized clinical trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:377–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ersin S, Aydin D, Makay O, Icoz G, Tamsel S, Sozbilen M, Killi R (2006) Is testicular perfusion influenced during laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery? Surg Endosc 20:685–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beddy P, Ridgway PF, Geoghegan T, Peirce C, Govender P, Keane FB, Torreggiani WC, Conlon KC (2006) Inguinal hernia repair protects testicular function: a prospective study of open and laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. J Am Coll Surg 203:17–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dilek ON, Yucel A, Akbulut G, Degirmenci B (2005) Are there adverse effects of herniorrhaphy techniques on testicular perfusion? Evaluation by color Doppler ultrasonography. Urol Int 75:167–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koksal N, Altinli E, Sumer A, Celik A, Onur E, Demir K, Sumer H, Kus D (2010) Impact of herniorrhaphy technique on testicular perfusion: results of a prospective study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:186–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Celik AS, Memmi N, Celebi F, Guzey D, Celik A, Kaplan R, Oncu M (2009) Impact of slit and nonslit mesh technique on testicular perfusion and volume in the early and late postoperative period of the totally extraperitoneal preperitoneal technique in patients with inguinal hernia. Am J Surg 2:287–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peeters E, Spiessens C, Oyen R, De Wever L, Vanderschueren D, Penninckx F, Miserez M (2010) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in men with lightweight meshes may significantly impair sperm motility: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 252:240–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Elster EA, Hale DA, Mannon RB, Cendales LC, Kleiner D, Swanson SJ, Kirk AD (2005) Surgical transplant physical examination: correlation of renal resistance index and biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy. J Am Coll Surg 200:552–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Neumayer L, Hurdcr AG, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R, Dunlop D., Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W; Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 456 Investigators (2004) Open mesh vs laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819-1827Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aasvang E, Kehlat H (2005) Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth 95:69–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA (1996) Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the post repair patient. Ann Surg 224:598–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Courtney CA, Duffy K, Serpell MG, O’Dwyer PJ (2002) Outcome of patients with severe chronic pain following repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1310–1314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wright D, Paterson C, Scott N, Hair A, O’Dwyer PJ (2002) Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235:333–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Salcedo-Wasicek MC, Thirlby RC (1995) Postoperative course after inguinal herniorrhaphy. A case-controlled comparison of patients receiving workers’ compensation vs patients with commercial insurance. Arch Surg 130:29–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Page B, Paterson C, Young D, O’Dwyer PJ (2002) Pain from primary inguinal hernia and the effect of repair on pain. Br J Surg 89:1315–1318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liem MS, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y, van Vroonhoven TJ; Coala Trial Group (2003) Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison. Ann Surg 237:136–141Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK, Lee F (2003) Prevalence and severity of chronic groin pain after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Surg Endosc 17:1620–1623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Heikkinen T, Bringman S, Ohtonen P, Kunelius P, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (2004) Five-year outcome of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties. Surg Endosc 18:518–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H (1999) Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 86:1528–1531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M, Kingsnorth A (2002) Chronic postherniorrhaphy pain—a call for uniform assessment. Hernia 6:178–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Perkins FM, Kehlet H (2000) Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology 93:1123–1133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mussack T, Ladurner R, Vogel T, Lienemann A, Eder-Willwohl A, Hallfeldt KK (2006) Health-related quality of life changes after laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair: a matched pair analysis. Surg Endosc 20:410–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L, Grant A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:1–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    de Jonge P, Lloyd A, Horsfall L, Tan R, O’Dwyer PJ (2008) The measurement of chronic pain and health-related quality of life following inguinal hernia repair: a review of the literature. Hernia 12:561–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Srsen D, Druzijanić N, Pogorelić Z, Perko Z, Juricić J, Kraljević D, Krnić D, Bilan K, Mimica Z (2008) Quality of life analysis after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair–retrospective study. Hepatogastroenterology 55:2112–2115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Myers E, Browne KM, Kavanagh DO, Hurley M (2010) Laparoscopic (TEP) versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. World J Surg 34:2059–2064CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anand Narayan Singh
    • 1
  • Virinder Kumar Bansal
    • 1
  • Mahesh C. Misra
    • 1
  • Subodh Kumar
    • 1
  • S. Rajeshwari
    • 2
  • Atin Kumar
    • 3
  • Rajesh Sagar
    • 4
  • Anand Kumar
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Surgical DisciplinesAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of AnaesthesiologyAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Radio-diagnosisAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
  4. 4.Department of PsychiatryAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
  5. 5.Department of Reproductive BiologyAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations