Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 508–513 | Cite as

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a quarter century: why do we still convert?

  • Balazs I. Lengyel
  • Dan Azagury
  • Oliver Varban
  • Maria T. Panizales
  • Jill Steinberg
  • David C. Brooks
  • Stanley W. Ashley
  • Ali Tavakkolizadeh
Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard procedure for gallbladder removal. However, conversion to open surgery is sometimes needed. The factors underlying a surgeon’s decision to convert a laparoscopic case to an open case are complex and poorly understood. With decreasing experience in open cholecystectomy, this procedure is however no longer the “safe” alternative it once was. With such an impending paradigm shift, this study aimed to identify the main reasons for conversion and ultimately to develop guidelines to help reduce the conversion rates.

Methods

Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database and financial records, the authors retrospectively reviewed 1,193 cholecystectomies performed at their institution from 2002 to 2009 and identified 70 conversions. Two independent surgeons reviewed the operative notes and determined the reasons for conversion. The number of ports at the time and the extent of dissection before conversion were assessed and used to create new conversion categories. Hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications, operative times and charges, and hospital charges were compared between the new groups.

Results

In 91% of conversion cases, the conversion was elective. In 49% of these conversions, the number of ports was fewer than four. According to the new conversion categories, most conversions were performed after minimal or no attempt at dissection. There were no differences in LOS, complications, operating room charges, or hospital charges between categories. Of the six emergent conversions (9%), bleeding and concern about common bile duct (CBD) injury were the main reasons. One CBD injury occurred.

Conclusions

In 49% of the cases, conversion was performed without a genuine attempt at laparoscopic dissection. Considering this new insight into the circumstances of conversion, the authors recommend that surgeons make a genuine effort at a laparoscopic approach, as reflected by placing four ports and trying to elevate the gallbladder before converting a case to an open approach.

Keywords

Conversion Gallbladder removal Laparoscopic cholecystectomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Begos DG, Modlin IM (1994) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from gimmick to gold standard. J Clin Gastroenterol 19:325–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sain AH (1996) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current “gold standard” for the treatment of gallstone disease. Ann Surg 224:689–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Livingston EH, Rege RV (2004) A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 188:205–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaafarani HM, Smith TS, Neumayer L, Berger DH, Depalma RG, Itani KM (2010) Trends, outcomes, and predictors of open and conversion to open cholecystectomy in Veterans Health Administration hospitals. Am J Surg 200:32–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lichten JB, Reid JJ, Zahalsky MP, Friedman RL (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the new millennium. Surg Endosc 15:867–872PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Low SW, Iyer SG, Chang SK, Mak KS, Lee VT, Madhavan K (2009) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: safe implementation of successful strategies to reduce conversion rates. Surg Endosc 23:2424–2429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tang B, Cuschieri A (2006) Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1081–1091PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ballal M, David G, Willmott S, Corless DJ, Deakin M, Slavin JP (2009) Conversion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Surg Endosc 23:2338–2344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolf AS, Nijsse BA, Sokal SM, Chang Y, Berger DL (2009) Surgical outcomes of open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 197:781–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wiseman JT, Sharuk MN, Singla A, Cahan M, Litwin DE, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2011) Surgical management of acute cholecystitis at a tertiary care center in the modern era. Arch Surg 145:439–444Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harboe KM, Bardram L (2011) The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database. Surg Endosc 25:1630–1641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lengyel B, Panizales MT, Steinberg J, Ashley SW, Tavakkolizadeh A (2011) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what is the price of conversion? Surgery (in press)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Low A, Decker D, Kania U, Hirner A (1997) Forensic aspects of complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Chirurg 68:395–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang WJ, Li JM, Wu GZ, Luo KL, Dong ZT (2008) Risk factors affecting conversion in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ANZ J Surg 78:973–976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jenkins PJ, Paterson HM, Parks RW, Garden OJ (2007) Open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Br J Surg 94:1382–1385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Stiernstam M, Westman B, Lundell L (2005) Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92:44–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alponat A, Kum CK, Koh BC, Rajnakova A, Goh PM (1997) Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 21:629–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, Lai EC, Wong J (1997) Early decision for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 173:513–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chung RS, Ahmed N (2010) The impact of minimally invasive surgery on residents’ open operative experience: analysis of two decades of national data. Ann Surg 251:205–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chung R, Pham Q, Wojtasik L, Chari V, Chen P (2003) The laparoscopic experience of surgical graduates in the United States. Surg Endosc 17:1792–1795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schulman CI, Levi J, Sleeman D, Dunkin B, Irvin G, Levi D, Spector S, Franceschi D, Livingstone A (2007) Are we training our residents to perform open gallbladder and common bile duct operations? J Surg Res 142:246–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Balazs I. Lengyel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dan Azagury
    • 1
  • Oliver Varban
    • 1
  • Maria T. Panizales
    • 1
  • Jill Steinberg
    • 1
  • David C. Brooks
    • 1
  • Stanley W. Ashley
    • 1
  • Ali Tavakkolizadeh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryBrigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyBrigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations