Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 124–129 | Cite as

Laparoscopic transcystic exploration for single-stage management of common duct stones and acute cholecystitis

  • Massimo ChiarugiEmail author
  • Christian Galatioto
  • Luigi Decanini
  • Adolfo Puglisi
  • Piero Lippolis
  • Chiara Bagnato
  • Sonia Panicucci
  • Marco Pelosini
  • Pietro Iacconi
  • Massimo Seccia
Article

Abstract

Background

Common bile duct (CBD) stones are found in 10% of patients who undergo elective laparoscopic surgery for gallstone disease and in 10–20% of patients who present with acute cholecystitis (AC). For the latter, the role of laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common duct (LTCE) as part of a single-stage procedure is still unknown.

Methods

This study, based on a “laparoscopy first” policy, included 201 subjects with cholecystocholedocholithiasis: 104 underwent a scheduled laparoscopic surgery (group A), and 97 where admitted for AC and had urgent laparoscopy (group B). Group B patients were significantly older (68.4 vs. 62.1 years; P = 0.0045), had a higher proportion of women (56% vs. 41%; P = 0.0345), and included more patients in the ASA III–IV class (39% vs. 21%; P = 0.0006). LTCE was performed by using basket-wired catheters. CBD clearance, operating time, conversion rate, morbidity and mortality, postoperative hospital stay, readmission, and residual CBD stones were the main outcome measures.

Results

Clearance of CBD was obtained in 84% of patients of group A and in 80% of patients of group B (P = not significant). Time spent in the operating room was longer for group B (175 vs. 141 min; P = 0.0003). There were no significant differences for postoperative hospital stay (group A 4.9 vs. group B 5.2 days), readmission rate (3.7% vs. 3.7%), and residual CBD stones (2.8% vs. 3.1%). Need to convert and morbidity occurred more frequently in group B (11.7% vs. 4.6% and 28.7% vs. 16.8%, respectively), but differences were not significant. In group A, one patient died from MOFS.

Conclusions

LTCE has proved to be a simple technique with a high yield of CBD clearance in the acute setting. Courses are comparable to those observed for the same procedure in elective surgery despite the fact that patients with AC are more at risk for drawbacks.

Keywords

Gallstone disease Common bile duct Acute cholecystitis Cholecystectomy Laparoscopy 

Notes

Disclosures

Drs. Chiarugi, Galatioto, Decanini, Puglisi, Lippolis, Bagnato, Pancicucci, Pelosini, Iacconi and Seccia have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson AG, Hosking SW (1987) Appraisal of the management of bile duct stones. Br J Surg 74:555–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Everhart JE, Khare M, Hill M, Maurer KR (1999) Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology 117:632–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gracie WA, Ransohoff DF (1982) The natural history of silent gallstones: the innocent gallstones is not a myth. N Engl J Med 307:798–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lyass S, Phillips EH (2006) Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 20:S441–S445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiarugi M, Galatioto C, Lippolis PV, Puglisi A, Battini A, Scassa F, Zocco G, Seccia M (2006) Simultaneous laparoscopic treatment for common bile duct stones associated with acute cholecystitis. Results of a prospective study. Chir Ital 58:709–716PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Apr 19(2):CD003327Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, Siperstein AE, Schecter WP, Campbell AR, Mackersie RC, Rodas A, Kreuwel HT, Harris HW (2010) Prospective randomized trial of LC + LCBDE vs ERCP/S + LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg 145(1):28–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stromberg C, Nilsson M, Leijonmarck CE (2008) Stone clearance and risk factors for failure in laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 22:1194–1199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giurgiu DI, Margulies DR, Carroll BJ, Gabbay J, Iida A, Takagi S, Fallas MJ, Phillips EH (1999) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Long-term outcome. Arch Surg 134:839–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Memon MA, Hassaballa H, Memon MI et al (2000) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: the past, the present, the future. Am J Surg 179:309–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vecchio R, MacFadyen BV (2002) Laparoscopic common duct exploration. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 387:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tokumura I, Umezawa A, Cao H, Sakamoto N, Imaoka Y, Ouchi A, Yamamoto K (2002) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:206–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, Sarnari J, De Sanctis A, D’Ambrosio G, Lezoche G, Perretta S, Lezoche E (2007) Thirteen years’ experience with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for stones. Surg Endosc 21:34–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Parks R, Martin D, Lombard M, British Society of Gastroenterology (2008) Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 57:1004–1021PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Phillips EH, Toouli J, Pitt HA, Soper NJ (2008) Treatment of common bile duct stones discovered during cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 12:624–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tinoco R, Tinoco A, El-Kadre L, Peres L, Sueth D (2008) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg 247:674–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hanif F, Ahmed Z, Abdel Samie M, Nassar A (2010) Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24:1552–1556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Csikesz N, Ricciardi R, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2008) Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States. World J Surg 32:2230–2236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bove A, Bongarzoni G, Palone G, Di Renzo RM, Calisesi EM, Corradetti L, Di Nicola M, Corbellini L (2009) Why is there recurrence after transcystic laparoscopic bile duct clearance? Risk factor analysis. Surg Endosc 23:1470–1475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cavina E, Franceschi M, Sidoti F, Goletti O, Buccianti P, Chiarugi M (1998) Laparo-endoscopic “rendezvous”: a new technique in the choledocholithiasis treatment. Hepatogastroenterology 45:1430–1435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Slim K, Pezet D, Stencl J Jr, Lechner C, Le Roux S, Lointier P, Chipponi J (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique. World J Surg 19:394–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E, Abrahamson J, Matter I (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: prospective trial. World J Surg 21:540–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Livingston EH, Rege RV (2004) A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 188:205–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Papi C, Catarci M, D’Ambrosio L, Gili L, Koch M, Grassi GB, Capurso L (2004) Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 99:147–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gurusamy KS, Samraj K (2006) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(4):CD005440Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lai PB, Kwong KH, Leung KL, Kwok SP, Chan AC, Chung SC, Lau WY (1998) Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 85:764–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Wong J (1998) Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 227:461–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kolla SB, Aggarwal S, Kumar A, Kumar R, Chumber S, Parshad R, Seenu V (2004) Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 18(9):1323–1327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chang TC, Lin MT, Wu MH, Wang MY, Lee PH (2009) Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology 56(89):26–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rojas-Ortega S, Arizpe-Bravo D, Marín López ER, Cesin-Sánchez R, Roman GR, Gómez C (2003) Transcystic common bile duct exploration in the management of patients with choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Surg 7(4):492–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Borzellino G, Sauerland S, Minicozzi AM, Verlato G, Di Pietrantonj C, De Manzoni G, Cordiano C (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. A meta-analysis of results. Surg Endosc 22:8–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tranter SE, Thompson MH (2002) Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 89:1495–1504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzegarld E, O’Sullivan G (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239:28–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimo Chiarugi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christian Galatioto
    • 1
  • Luigi Decanini
    • 1
  • Adolfo Puglisi
    • 1
  • Piero Lippolis
    • 1
  • Chiara Bagnato
    • 1
  • Sonia Panicucci
    • 1
  • Marco Pelosini
    • 1
  • Pietro Iacconi
    • 1
  • Massimo Seccia
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Pisa Medical SchoolPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations