Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 72–78 | Cite as

Risk for local recurrence of early gastric cancer treated with piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection during a 10-year follow-up period

  • Noriyuki HorikiEmail author
  • Fumio Omata
  • Masayo Uemura
  • Shoko Suzuki
  • Naoki Ishii
  • Katsuyuki Fukuda
  • Yoshiyuki Fujita
  • Katsuhiro Ninomiya
  • Shunsuke Tano
  • Masaki Katurahara
  • Kyosuke Tanaka
  • Esteban C. Gabazza
  • Yoshiyuki Takei
Article

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a therapy for early gastric cancer (EGC) that can be provided relatively easily and safely in any institution. Identification of the resection margin is a problem in EMR, especially in cases of piecemeal EMR. Despite the long-standing widespread use of piecemeal EMR for EGC, its limitation and long-term outcomes in clinical practice have not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to determine the risk factors of piecemeal EMR, the local recurrence rates, and the mortality rate.

Methods

A cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study was performed to investigate the risks of piecemeal EMR for patients with the diagnosis of differentiated adenocarcinoma localized to the mucosa. Local recurrence of EGC was investigated by annual follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for 10 years. EMR was performed with snare electrocautery using a two-channel scope. When a resection margin was clearly positive for cancer, additional surgery was performed soon after the initial EMR.

Results

For the 149 EGC patients (mean age, 68.8 ± 9.8; male, 77%) who underwent EMR between 1995 and 2001, EMR was performed en bloc in 66 cases and piecemeal in 83 cases. The comorbid conditions existing in 34 of the 149 patients included other malignancies (n = 12), heart failure (n = 5), pulmonary disease (n = 7), liver cirrhosis (n = 4), and other illness (n = 6). However, EMR was completed without complication. The mean area (length × width) of the lesions was 404 ± 289 mm2 in the piecemeal group and 250 ± 138 mm2 in the en bloc groups. The en bloc and piecemeal EMR groups differed significantly in terms of unclear horizontal margins but not in terms of unclear vertical margins. Multiple logistic regression suggested that the adjusted odds ratio for maximum diameters exceeding 20 mm for piecemeal EMR was 2.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30–5.64). According to Kaplan–Meier estimates, the local recurrence rate was 30% (95% CI, 20–40%) at

both 5 and 10 years. No recurrence was observed in the en bloc group. The adjusted hazard ratio of unclear horizontal margins for local recurrence was 1.63 (95% CI, 1.12–2.36). A total of 24 patients died after EMR because of comorbid conditions, including other malignancies (n = 11), cardiovascular disease (n = 6), pulmonary disease (n = 4), liver cirrhosis (n = 2), and traffic accident (n = 1). However, no patient died of gastric cancer during the 10-year follow-up period.

Conclusions

An evaluation of horizontal margins in terms of local recurrence after piecemeal EMR is important, and en bloc resection is recommended. Close follow-up assessment is warranted, especially within 5 years in cases of unclear margin resection after piecemeal EMR. The use of EMR is safe even for patients with severe comorbid conditions.

Keywords

Early gastric cancer EMR Endoscopic mucosal resection Recurrence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Masataka Maruyama for his kind collaboration and Dr. Gautam Deshpande for English editing.

Disclosures

Noriyuki Horiki, Fumio Omata, Masayo Uemura, Shoko Suzuki, Naoki Ishii, Katsuyuki Fukuda, Yoshiyuki Fujita, Katsuhiro Ninomiya, Shunsuke Tano, Masaki Katurahara, Kyosuke Tanaka, Esteban C. Gabazza, and Yoshiyuki Takei have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (1998) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. 2nd English ed. In: Gastric cancer. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, Kanehara, Tokyo, pp 10–24Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee TH, Cho JY, Chang YW, Kim JO, Lee JS, Cho WY, Kim HG, Kim WJ, Park YS, Jin SY (2010) Appropriate indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer according to tumor size and histologic type. Gastrointest Endosc 71:920–926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, Shirao K, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, Hosokawa K, Shimoda T, Yoshida S (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 48:225–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kojima T, Parra-Blanco A, Takahashi H, Fujita R (1998) Outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: review of the Japanese literature. Gastrointest Endosc 48:550–554 discussion 554–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oda I, Saito D, Tada M, Iishi H, Tanabe S, Oyama T, Doi T, Otani Y, Fujisaki J, Ajioka Y, Hamada T, Inoue H, Gotoda T, Yoshida S (2006) A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 9:262–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I, Mouri R, Hirata M, Kawamura T, Yoshihara M, Chayama K (2006) Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 64:877–883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gotoda T (2007) Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 10:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Etoh T, Katai H, Fukagawa T, Sano T, Oda I, Gotoda T, Yoshimura K, Sasako M (2005) Treatment of early gastric cancer in the elderly patient: results of EMR and gastrectomy at a national referral center in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc 62:868–871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Welfare MoHa (1994) Abridged life table for Japan. In: MsS (ed) Statistic and Information Department. Minister’s Secretariat, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ludwig K, Klautke G, Bernhard J, Weiner R (2005) Minimally invasive and local treatment for mucosal early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 19:1362–1366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Everett SM, Axon AT (1997) Early gastric cancer in Europe. Gut 41:142–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shimizu S, Tada M, Kawai K (1995) Early gastric cancer: its surveillance and natural course. Endoscopy 27:27–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Biasco G, Paganelli GM, Azzaroni D, Grigioni WF, Merighi SM, Stoja R, Villanacci V, Rusticali AG, Lo Cuoco D, Caporale V et al (1987) Early gastric cancer in Italy. Clinical and pathological observations on 80 cases. Dig Dis Sci 32:113–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farley DR, Donohue JH, Nagorney DM, Carpenter HA, Katzmann JA, Ilstrup DM (1992) Early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 79:539–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lawrence M, Shiu MH (1991) Early gastric cancer: twenty-eight-year experience. Ann Surg 213:327–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ohyama T, Kobayashi Y, Mori K, Kano K, Sakurai Y, Sato Y (2002) Factors affecting complete resection of gastric tumors by the endoscopic mucosal resection procedure. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:844–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsukuma H, Mishima T, Oshima A (1983) Prospective study of “early” gastric cancer. Int J Cancer 31:421–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsukuma H, Oshima A, Narahara H, Morii T (2000) Natural history of early gastric cancer: a nonconcurrent, long-term, follow-up study. Gut 47:618–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kakushima N, Fujishiro M (2008) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol 14:2962–2967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Imagawa A, Okada H, Kawahara Y, Takenaka R, Kato J, Kawamoto H, Fujiki S, Takata R, Yoshino T, Shiratori Y (2006) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: results and degrees of technical difficulty as well as success. Endoscopy 38:987–990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ohkuwa M, Hosokawa K, Boku N, Ohtu A, Tajiri H, Yoshida S (2001) New endoscopic treatment for intramucosal gastric tumors using an insulated-tip diathermic knife. Endoscopy 33:221–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Takenaka R, Kawahara Y, Okada H, Hori K, Inoue M, Kawano S, Tanioka D, Tsuzuki T, Yagi S, Kato J, Uemura M, Ohara N, Yoshino T, Imagawa A, Fujiki S, Takata R, Yamamoto K (2008) Risk factors associated with local recurrence of early gastric cancers after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 68:887–894PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee IL, Wu CS, Tung SY, Lin PY, Shen CH, Wei KL, Chang TS (2008) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers: experience from a new endoscopic center in Taiwan. J Clin Gastroenterol 42:42–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shimura T, Sasaki M, Kataoka H, Tanida S, Oshima T, Ogasawara N, Wada T, Kubota E, Yamada T, Mori Y, Fujita F, Nakao H, Ohara H, Inukai M, Kasugai K, Joh T (2007) Advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection over conventional endoscopic mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:821–826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murakami T (1971) Pathomorphological diagnosis: definition and gross classification of early gastric cancer. Gann Monogr Cancer Res 11:3Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nishi M, Ishihara S, Nakajima T, Ohta K, Ohyama S, Ohta H (1995) Chronological changes of characteristics of early gastric cancer and therapy: experience in the Cancer Institute Hospital of Tokyo, 1950–1994. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 121:535–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sano T, Kobori O, Muto T (1992) Lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: endoscopic resection of tumour. Br J Surg 79:241–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miyata M, Yokoyama Y, Okoyama N, Joh T, Seno K, Sasaki M, Ohara H, Nomura T, Kasugai K, Itoh M (2000) What are the appropriate indications for endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer? Analysis of 256 endoscopically resected lesions. Endoscopy 32:773–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2004) Treatment guideline for gastric cancer in Japan, 2nd edn. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, Kanehara, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hamada T SS, Abe T, Kondo K, Hanada K, Tamura S, Kitamura S, Yamaki G, Higashi K (2006) Endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastric cancer. Stomach Intest 41:7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noriyuki Horiki
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fumio Omata
    • 2
  • Masayo Uemura
    • 2
  • Shoko Suzuki
    • 2
  • Naoki Ishii
    • 2
  • Katsuyuki Fukuda
    • 2
  • Yoshiyuki Fujita
    • 2
  • Katsuhiro Ninomiya
    • 3
  • Shunsuke Tano
    • 3
  • Masaki Katurahara
    • 1
  • Kyosuke Tanaka
    • 1
  • Esteban C. Gabazza
    • 4
  • Yoshiyuki Takei
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EndoscopyMie University, School of MedicineTsuJapan
  2. 2.Department of GastroenterologySt. Luke’s International HospitalTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMie University, School of MedicineTsuJapan
  4. 4.Department of ImmunologyMie University, Graduate School of MedicineTsuJapan

Personalised recommendations