Mastery versus the standard proficiency target for basic laparoscopic skill training: effect on skill transfer and retention
- 355 Downloads
Little evidence exists to guide educators in the best way to implement simulation within surgical skills curricula. This study investigated whether practicing a basic Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) simulator task [peg transfer (PT)] facilitates learning a more complex skill [intracorporeal suturing (ICS)] and compared the effect of PT training to mastery with training to the passing level on PT retention and on learning ICS.
For this study, 98 surgically naïve subjects were randomized to one of three PT training groups: control, standard training, and overtraining. All the participants then trained in ICS. The learning curves for ICS were analyzed by estimating the learning plateau and rate using nonlinear regression. Skill retention was assessed by retesting participants 1 month after training. The groups were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Effectiveness of skill transfer was calculated using the transfer effectiveness ratio (TER). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (p < 0.05).
The study was completed by 77 participants (28 control, 26 standard, and 23 overtrained subjects). The ICS learning plateau rose with increasing PT training (452 ± 10 vs. 459 ± 10 vs. 467 ± 10; p < 0.01). Increased PT training was associated with a trend toward higher initial ICS scores (128 ± 107 vs. 127 ± 110 vs. 183 ± 106; p = 0.13) and faster learning rates (15 ± 4 vs. 14 ± 4 vs. 13 ± 4 trials; p = 0.10). At retention, there were no differences in PT scores (p = 0.5). The PT training took 20 ± 10 min for standard training and 39 ± 20 min for overtraining (p < 0.01). Overtrained participants saved 11 ± 5 min in ICS training compared with the control subjects (p = 0.04). However, TER was 0.165 for the overtraining group and 0.160 for the standard training group, suggesting that PT overtraining took longer than the time saved on ICS training.
For surgically naïve subjects, part-task training with PT alone was associated with slight improvements in the learning curve for ICS. However, overtraining with PT did not improve skill retention, and peg training alone was not an efficient strategy for learning ICS.
KeywordsFLS Learning curve Part-task training Proficiency-based training Retention
This research project was supported by a Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) research grant. The Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation receives an unrestricted educational grant from Covidien. We thank SAGES for awarding us a research grant for this project. We also thank the students who participated in this study.
Nicoleta O. Kolozsvari receives salary support from the McGill Surgeon Scientist program. Nicoleta O. Kolozsvari, Pepa Kaneva, Chantalle Brace, Genevieve Chartrand, Marilou Vaillancourt, Jiguo Cao, Daniel Banaszek, Sebastian Demyttenaere, Melina C. Vassiliou, Gerald M. Fried, and Liane S. Feldman have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 5.ABS The American Board of Surgery (2008) ABS to require ACLS, ATLS, and FLS for general surgery certification. http://home.absurgery.org/default.jsp?news_newreqs. Retrieved 27 Oct 2009
- 8.Lehto MR, Buck J (2008) Introduction to human factors and ergonomics for engineers. Taylor & Francis Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 9.Proctor RW, Vu KPL (2006) Laboratory studies of training, skill acquisition, and retention of performance. In: Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman JR (eds) The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 265–286Google Scholar
- 17.Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2003–2008) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery: technical skills proficiency-based training curriculum. http://www.flsprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Technical-Skills-Proficiency-Bases-Training-Curriculum.pdf. Retrieved 6 Feb 2011
- 18.Ebbinghaus H (1964) Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. Dover Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lathan CE, Tracey MR, Sebrechts MM, Clawson DM, Higgins GA (2002) Using virtual environments as training simulators: measuring transfer. In: Stanney KM (ed) Handbook of virtual environments: design implementation and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, p 403Google Scholar
- 24.http://www.flsprogram.org. Retrieved 28 March 2009 accessed
- 28.Roscoe SN, Williges BH (1980) Measurement of transfer or training. Chap 16. In: Roscoe SN (ed) Aviation psychology. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
- 29.Williges BH, Roscoe SN, Williges RC (1973) Synthetic flight training revisited. J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 15:543–560Google Scholar
- 35.Norman G, Eva K, Brooks L, Hamstra SJ (2006) Expertise in medicine and surgery. In: Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR (eds) The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 339–354Google Scholar