Surgical Endoscopy

, 25:3312 | Cite as

Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed in a community hospital setting: the future of bariatric surgery?

  • Chan W. Park
  • Edward C. F. Lam
  • Teresa M. Walsh
  • Maxine Karimoto
  • Adrienne T. Ma
  • Matthew Koo
  • Chet Hammill
  • Kenric Murayama
  • Cedric S. F. Lorenzo
  • Racquel Bueno
Article

Abstract

Introduction

Since receiving Food and Drug Administration approval in 2000, surgery utilizing a robot has been successfully performed in numerous procedures including gastric bypass. However, despite the proven safety profile, reported lower complication rates, and technical benefits of robotic surgery, only a few centers in the USA have consistently applied this technology to bariatric surgery. In addition, there are limited studies with relatively small sample sizes comparing robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB) with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB).

Methods

Through a retrospective analysis of our database, we compared outcomes of RRYGB versus LRYGB in the treatment of morbid obesity. All patients who underwent RRYGB and LRYGB through the Comprehensive Weight Management Program of the Queen’s Medical Center (Honolulu, HI) from January 2007 to December 2009 were included. Outcomes data included weight loss, operative times, and hospital length of stay. All complications were reported.

Results

105 patients who underwent RRYGB were compared with 195 patients who received LRYGB. Excess weight loss, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay were similar in both groups. There were no mortalities in either group. The RRYGB group experienced a 9.5% complication rate versus 9.7% in LRYGB patients. Operative time was the only statistically significant difference, being approximately 17 min in favor of LRYGB. However, there was a steady decrease in RRYGB operative time with increasing experience.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates a favorable safety profile with nearly equivalent outcomes and some previously unidentified qualitative benefits of the RRYGB approach to bariatric surgery in a community setting. These results are despite our early experience with the robotic surgery platform and confirm noninferiority of RRYGB versus LRYGB. While the RRYGB operative time was longer than LRYGB, the demonstrated decrease in operative time commensurate with increase in operative experience holds tremendous promise for the future.

Keywords

Bariatric Obesity Instruments Robotic surgery Gastric bypass 

Notes

Disclosures

Authors Chan W. Park, Edward CF Lam, Teresa M. Walsh, Maxine Karimoto, MD, Adrienne T. Ma, Matt Koo, Chet Hammill, Cedric S. F. Lorenzo, and Racquel Bueno have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Author Kenric Murayama is a speaker/proctor for Covidien and has received honoraria from them.

References

  1. 1.
    Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR (2010) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. J Am Med Assoc 303(3):235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles K (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 292:1724–1737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, Lystig T, Sullivan M, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Bengtsson C, Dahlgren S, Gummesson A, Jacobson P, Karlsson J, Lindroos AK, Lonroth H, Naslund I, Olbers T, Stenlof K, Torgerson J, Agren G, Carlsson LM (2007) The effects of obesity on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 357(8):741–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pories WJ (2008) Bariatric surgery: risks and rewards. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(11):S89–S96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS) Consortium (2009) Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 361:445–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weller WE, Rosati C (2008) Comparing outcomes of laparoscopic versus open bariatric surgery. Ann Surg 248(1):10–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Talamini MA, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin WS (2003) A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 17:1521–1524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M (2007) Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 110(9):1951–1958PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Payne TN, Dauterive FR (2008) A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(3):286–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    da Vinci Surgery. Overview of surgical procedures, including gastric bypass surgery. Available at: http://www.davincisurgery.com/procedures/index.aspx. Accessed 14 April 2010
  11. 11.
    Ali MR, Bhasker-Rao B, Wolfe BM (2005) Robot-assisted laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 19:468–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parini U, Fabozzi M, Contul RB, Millo P, Loffredo A, Allieta R, Nardi M Jr, Lale-Murix E (2006) Laparoscopic gastric bypass performed with the da vinci intuitive robotic system: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 20:1851–1857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mohr CJ, Nadzam GS, Curet M (2005) Totally robotic roux-en-y gastric bypass. Arch Surg 140:779–786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mohr CJ, Nadzam GS, Alami RS, Sanchez BR, Curet MJ (2006) Totally robotic laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass: Results from 75 patients. Obes Surg 16:690–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Gypen B, Van Tu T, Vaneerdeweg W (2008) Roux-en-y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc 22:1690–1696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yu SC, Clapp BL, Lee MJ, Albrecht WC, Scarborough TK, Wilson EB (2006) Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic assisted gastric bypasses. Am J Surg 192:746–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Fact Sheet on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Available at: http://www.asbs.org/Newsite07/media/asmbs_fs_surgery.pdf. Accessed 14 April 2010
  18. 18.
    Ali MR, Rasmussen J, Bhasker-Rao B (2007) Teaching robotic surgery: a stepwise approach. Surg Endosc 21:912–915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chan W. Park
    • 1
  • Edward C. F. Lam
    • 2
  • Teresa M. Walsh
    • 2
  • Maxine Karimoto
    • 2
  • Adrienne T. Ma
    • 2
  • Matthew Koo
    • 2
  • Chet Hammill
    • 1
  • Kenric Murayama
    • 3
  • Cedric S. F. Lorenzo
    • 1
  • Racquel Bueno
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.John A. Burns School of MedicineUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations