Miniature in vivo robot for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery
- First Online:
- 365 Downloads
The aim of this study was to develop a multidexterous robot capable of generating the required forces and speeds to perform surgical tasks intra-abdominally. Current laparoscopic surgical robots are expensive, bulky, and fundamentally constrained by a small entry incision. A new approach to minimally invasive surgery places the robot completely within the patient. Miniature in vivo robots may allow surgeons to overcome current laparoscopic constraints such as dexterity, orientation, and visualization.
A collaborative research group from the Department of Surgery at the University of Nebraska Medical Center and the College of Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln designed and built a surgical robot prototype capable of performing specific surgical tasks within the peritoneal cavity.
The basic robotic design consists of two arms each connected to a central body. Each arm has three degrees of freedom and rotational shoulder and elbow joints. This combination allows a surgeon to grasp, manipulate, cauterize, and perform intracorporeal suturing. The robot’s workspace is a hollow hemisphere with an inner radius of 75 mm and an outer radius of 205 mm. Its versatility was demonstrated in four procedures performed in a porcine model: cholecystectomy, partial colectomy, abdominal exploration, and intracorporeal suturing.
Miniature in vivo robots have the potential to address the limitations of using articulated instrumentation to perform advanced laparoscopic surgical procedures. Once inserted into the peritoneal cavity, the robot provides a stable platform for visualization with sufficient dexterity and speed to perform surgical tasks from multiple orientations and workspaces.
KeywordsLaparoendoscopic single-site surgery LESS Robotic surgery Minimally invasive surgery Miniature robot
- 2.Faraz A, Payandeh S (2000) Engineering approaches to mechanical and robotic design for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp 1–11Google Scholar
- 3.Liem MS, van der Graaf Y, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Stassen LP, Vente JP, Weidema WF, Schrijvers AJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336(22):1541–1547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Lehman AC, Tiwari MM, Shah BC, Farritor SM, Nelson C, Oleynikov D (2010) Recent advances in robotic manipulators and miniature in vivo robotics for minimally invasive surgery. J Mech Eng Sci 224(7):1487–1494Google Scholar