Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer
Laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer is considered to be more technically demanding than laparoscopic colectomy. This study aimed to analyze the learning curve for laparoscopic low anterior resection and to identify the factors that influence this learning curve.
Data from 250 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer, excluding patients with a combined resection such as cholecystectomy, hepatectomy, hysterectomy, or gastrectomy, between December 1996 and April 2010 were analyzed. For operative time, the learning curve was analyzed using the moving average method. The conversion rate and the postoperative complication rate were evaluated in five groups of up to 50 patients each based on the number of cases required for analysis of operative time. In addition, risk factors that influenced conversion to open surgery and postoperative complications were analyzed.
The learning curve analysis for operative time using the moving average method showed stabilization at 50 cases. The conversion rate decreased significantly by group 4 (151–200 cases). The postoperative complication rate decreased significantly by group 5 (201–250 cases). The significant factors for conversion to open surgery were male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.6094; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–6.4) and T stage (OR, 2.4793; 95% CI, 1.1–5.8). For postoperative complications, male sex (OR, 3.8590; 95% CI, 1.9–3.8) was significant. In addition, the risk factors for anastomotic leakage were male sex (OR, 15.7659, 95% CI, 3.2–284.8) and multiple firing (2 or more cartridges for rectal transection) (OR, 3.0589; 95% CI, 1.1–9.5).
The risk factors affecting the learning curve for laparoscopic low anterior resection were T stage and male sex. In laparoscopic low anterior resection, rectal transection in particular can be technically difficult, and standardization for accurate performance of the same technique for expanded indications is very important.
KeywordsAnastomotic leakage Laparoscopic surgery Learning curve Low anterior resection Rectal cancer
Hajime Kayano, Junji Okuda, Keitaro Tanaka, Keisaku Kondo, and Nobuhiko Tanigawa have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 12.Choi DH, Jeong WK, Lim SW, Chung TS, Park JI, Lim SB, Choi HS, Nam BH, Chang HJ, Jeong SY (2008) Learning curves for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy used to manage curable sigmoid colon cancer: single-institute, three-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9753-y
- 15.Diggle P (1990) Time series: a biostatistical introduction. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 16.CR JSC (1997) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma by Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Kanehara & Co Ltd, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- 21.Marush F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch H-P, Köhler L, Bärlehner E, Köckerling F, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG) (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15:116–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar