Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 1466–1471 | Cite as

Does illness severity matter? A comparison of laparoscopic esophagomyotomy with fundoplication and esophageal dilation for achalasia

  • Jason F. Reynoso
  • Manish M. Tiwari
  • Albert W. Tsang
  • Dmitry Oleynikov



There is scarce evidence regarding optimal treatment options for achalasia in patients with varying illness severity risk. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare outcomes with laparoscopic esophagomyotomy with fundoplication (LM) and esophageal dilation (ED) for hospitalized patients with different illness severity.


The University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) is an alliance of more than 100 academic medical centers and nearly 200 affiliate hospitals. UHC’s Clinical Data Base/Resource Manager (CDB/RM) allows member hospitals to compare patient-level risk-adjusted outcomes for performance improvement purposes. The CDB/RM was queried for patients with achalasia who underwent LM (n = 1,390) or ED (n = 492) during a 3-year period between 2006 and 2008.


Overall esophageal perforation rates were significantly higher for ED (0.4% LM vs. 2.4% ED; p < 0.001). Patients undergoing LM with minor/moderate illness severity showed higher morbidity (9.42% LM vs. 5.15% ED; p < 0.05). However, LM patients in this illness severity group showed significantly lower 30-day readmission rate (0.38% LM vs. 7.32% ED; p < 0.001) and length of stay (2.23 ± 1.78 LM vs. 4.88 ± 4.42 days ED; p < 0.001), but comparable cost ($9,539 LM vs. $8990 ED; p > 0.05). In the major/extreme illness severity group mortality was comparable (1.37% LM vs. 2.44% ED; p > 0.05). Overall morbidity was significantly greater in LM (50.48% LM vs. 19.57% ED; p < 0.001). However, the length of stay was significantly increased in the ED group (8.96 ± 7.86 LM vs. 11.72 ± 11.05 days ED; p = 0.04).


In hospitalized patients with minor/moderate illness severity, laparoscopic myotomy for achalasia showed comparable or better outcomes than ED. For major/extreme illness severity, dilation showed comparable or better profile for hospitalized achalasia patients. These results highlight the importance and impact of illness severity on outcomes of achalasia patients.


Achalasia Digestive General Therapeutic/palliation Heller myotomy Esophageal dilation Outcomes Illness severity Esophageal perforation 


  1. 1.
    Williams VA, Peters JH (2009) Achalasia of the esophagus: a surgical disease. J Am Coll Surg 208(1):151–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crookes PF, Corkill S, DeMeester TR (1997) Gastroesophageal reflux in achalasia. When is reflux really reflux? Dig Dis Sci 42(7):1354–1361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eckardt AJ, Eckardt VF (2009) Current clinical approach to achalasia. World J Gastroenterol 15(32):3969–3975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Annese V, Bassotti G (2006) Nonsurgical treatment of esophageal achalasia. World J Gastroenterol 12(36):5763–5766PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pasricha PJ et al (1995) Intrasphincteric botulinum toxin for the treatment of achalasia. N Engl J Med 332(12):774–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Allescher HD et al (2001) Treatment of achalasia: botulinum toxin injection vs. pneumatic balloon dilation. A prospective study with long-term follow-up. Endoscopy 33(12):1007–1017PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leyden JE, Moss AC, MacMathuna P (2006) Endoscopic pneumatic dilation versus botulinum toxin injection in the management of primary achalasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD005046Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campos GM et al (2009) Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 249(1):45–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kadakia SC, Wong RK (1993) Graded pneumatic dilation using Rigiflex achalasia dilators in patients with primary esophageal achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol 88(1):34–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Katsinelos P et al (2005) Long-term results of pneumatic dilation for achalasia: a 15 years’ experience. World J Gastroenterol 11(36):5701–5705PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cowgill SM et al (2009) Laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia: results after 10 years. Surg Endosc 23(12):2644–2649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stewart KC et al (1999) Thoracoscopic versus laparoscopic modified Heller myotomy for achalasia: efficacy and safety in 87 patients. J Am Coll Surg 189(2):164–169 discussion 169–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patti MG et al (1998) Comparison of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 2(6):561–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ancona E et al (1995) Esophageal achalasia: laparoscopic versus conventional open Heller-Dor operation. Am J Surg 170(3):265–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang YR et al (2008) Trends of Heller myotomy hospitalizations for achalasia in the United States, 1993–2005: effect of surgery volume on perioperative outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol 103(10):2454–2464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Csendes A et al (2006) Very late results of esophagomyotomy for patients with achalasia: clinical, endoscopic, histologic, manometric, and acid reflux studies in 67 patients for a mean follow-up of 190 months. Ann Surg 243(2):196–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Csendes A et al (1989) Late results of a prospective randomised study comparing forceful dilatation and oesophagomyotomy in patients with achalasia. Gut 30(3):299–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lopushinsky SR, Urbach DR (2006) Pneumatic dilatation and surgical myotomy for achalasia. JAMA 296(18):2227–2233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ben-Meir A et al (2001) Quality of life before and after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Am J Surg 181(5):471–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Decker G et al (2002) Gastrointestinal quality of life before and after laparoscopic heller myotomy with partial posterior fundoplication. Ann Surg 236(6):750–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hinojosa MW et al (2007) Comparison of laparoscopic vs open sigmoid colectomy for benign and malignant disease at academic medical centers. J Gastrointest Surg 11(11):1423–1429 discussion 1429–1430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Graham BB et al (2010) Diabetes mellitus does not adversely affect outcomes from a critical illness. Crit Care Med 38(1):16–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carbonell AM, Wolfe LG, DeMaria EJ (2005) Poor outcomes in cirrhosis-associated hernia repair: a nationwide cohort study of 32,033 patients. Hernia 9(4):353–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shen Y (2003) Applying the 3M All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups Grouper to measure inpatient severity in the VA. Med Care 41(6 Suppl):II103–II110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vogt D et al (1997) Successful treatment of esophageal achalasia with laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Toupet fundoplication. Am J Surg 174(6):709–714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kunisaki K (2005) Simpson’s paradox. Crit Care Med 33(7):1673–1674 author reply 1674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dobrucali A et al (2004) Long-term results of graded pneumatic dilatation under endoscopic guidance in patients with primary esophageal achalasia. World J Gastroenterol 10(22):3322–3327PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mikaeli J et al (2004) Pneumatic balloon dilatation in achalasia: a prospective comparison of safety and efficacy with different balloon diameters. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20(4):431–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chan KC et al (2004) Short-term and long-term results of endoscopic balloon dilation for achalasia: 12 years’ experience. Endoscopy 36(8):690–694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ghoshal UC et al (2004) Long-term follow-up after pneumatic dilation for achalasia cardia: factors associated with treatment failure and recurrence. Am J Gastroenterol 99(12):2304–2310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tsuboi K et al (2009) Preoperative dilatation does not affect the surgical outcome of laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for esophageal achalasia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(2):98–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Snyder CW et al (2009) Multiple preoperative endoscopic interventions are associated with worse outcomes after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 13(12):2095–2103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Richards WO et al (2004) Heller myotomy versus Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication for achalasia: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. Ann Surg 240(3):405–412 discussion 412–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wright AS et al (2007) Long-term outcomes confirm the superior efficacy of extended Heller myotomy with Toupet fundoplication for achalasia. Surg Endosc 21(5):713–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rebecchi F et al (2008) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication versus Nissen fundoplication for achalasia: long-term results. Ann Surg 248(6):1023–1030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason F. Reynoso
    • 1
  • Manish M. Tiwari
    • 1
  • Albert W. Tsang
    • 1
  • Dmitry Oleynikov
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Nebraska, University of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations