Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 1446–1451 | Cite as

Thirty-day readmission after ventral hernia repair: predictable or preventable?

  • Jeffrey A. Blatnik
  • Karem C. Harth
  • Mark I. Aeder
  • Michael J. Rosen
Article

Abstract

Introduction

Thirty-day readmission has become an increasingly scrutinized event in the field of surgery, especially in light of projected cuts in reimbursement. Although studies have evaluated large populations, little work has been done on procedure-specific populations. Our objective is to determine if any factors are predictive of 30-day readmission in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent laparoscopic or open ventral hernia repair over a 4-year period. We evaluated patients based on demographic, preoperative, and operative variables. The primary outcome measure was all-cause 30-day readmission.

Results

There were 420 patients identified for evaluation. Fifty-one (12%) patients required readmission to the hospital within 30 days. The most common indications for readmission were wound infection (57%; n = 29) and gastrointestinal (GI) complication (19%; n = 10). On analysis, demographic variables were similar between the two groups. However, patients who were readmitted were more likely to have had more prior abdominal surgeries (4 vs. 2; p < 0.0001), more previous hernia repairs (2 vs. 1; p = 0.006), open repair (76% vs. 46%; p < 0.0001), and active abdominal infection (37% vs. 12%; p < 0.0001). In addition, patients also had longer procedures (235 vs. 150 min; p < 0.0001) and larger defects (350 vs. 96 cm2; p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of readmission included presence of fistula [odds ratio (OR) = 8.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.21–22.72], defect size > 300 cm2 (OR = 5.35; 95% CI 2.59–11.05), active abdominal infection (OR = 4.37; 95% CI 2.28–8.37), and open repair (OR = 4.27; 95% CI 2.17–8.42).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing ventral hernia repair can represent a complex group. In our practice, enterocutaneous fistula, defect size > 300 cm2, active abdominal infection, and open repair were all independent risk factors (OR > 4) for 30-day readmission after ventral hernia repair. Recognition of these high-risk patients can help focus resources to increase surveillance and possible early intervention to reduce readmissions.

Keywords

Hernia Readmission Complication Wound infection 

Notes

Disclosures

Authors Blatnik, Harth, and Aeder have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Dr. Rosen serves as a consultant and receives an honorarium from Covidien, LifeCell, and Gore.

References

  1. 1.
    Commission MPA (2007) June 2007 Report to the congress: promoting greater efficiency in medicare. 1–297Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Averill RF, McCullough EC, Hughes JS, Goldfield NI, Vertrees JC, Fuller RL (2009) Redesigning the medicare inpatient PPS to reduce payments to hospitals with high readmission rates. Health Care Financ Rev 30:1–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldfield NI, McCullough EC, Hughes JS, Tang AM, Eastman B, Rawlins LK, Averill RF (2008) Identifying potentially preventable readmissions. Health Care Financ Rev 30:75–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harth KC, Rosen MJ (2010) Endoscopic versus open component separation in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg 199:342–346 (discussion 346–347)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jin J, Rosen MJ, Blatnik J, McGee MF, Williams CP, Marks J, Ponsky J (2007) Use of acellular dermal matrix for complicated ventral hernia repair: does technique affect outcomes? J Am Coll Surg 205:654–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA (2009) Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med 360:1418–1428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Silverstein MD, Qin H, Mercer SQ, Fong J, Haydar Z (2008) Risk factors for 30-day hospital readmission in patients ≥65 years of age. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 21:363–372Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hasan O, Meltzer DO, Shaykevich SA, Bell CM, Kaboli PJ, Auerbach AD, Wetterneck TB, Arora VM, Zhang J, Schnipper JL (2010) Hospital readmission in general medicine patients: a prediction model. J Gen Intern Med 25:211–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Brien DP, Senagore A, Merlino J, Brady K, Delaney C (2007) Predictors and outcome of readmission after laparoscopic intestinal surgery. World J Surg 31:2430–2435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guinier D, Mantion GA, Alves A, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K, Panis Y, Association Francaise de Chirurgie (2007) Risk factors of unplanned readmission after colorectal surgery: a prospective, multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1316–1323Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sorensen LT, Karlsmark T, Gottrup F (2003) Abstinence from smoking reduces incisional wound infection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 238:1–5PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey A. Blatnik
    • 1
  • Karem C. Harth
    • 1
  • Mark I. Aeder
    • 1
  • Michael J. Rosen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Hernia CenterCase Western Reserve University School of MedicineClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations