Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures
Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to offer superior surgical outcomes for most abdominal surgical procedures. However, there is hardly any evidence on surgical outcomes with patient risk stratification. This study aimed to compare outcomes of common laparoscopic and open surgical procedures for varying illness severity.
A retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes for six commonly performed surgical procedures including cholecystectomy, appendectomy, reflux surgery, gastric bypass surgery, ventral hernia repair, and colectomy was performed using the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Clinical Database/Resource Manager (CDB/RM). The 3-year discharge data for the six commonly performed laparoscopic surgical procedures were analyzed for outcome measures including observed mortality, overall patient morbidity, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, 30-day readmissions, length of hospital stay, and hospital costs.
In this study, 208,314 patients underwent one of six common surgical procedures by either the open or the laparoscopic approach. Overall, the laparoscopic approach showed significantly lower mortality, reduced morbidity, fewer ICU admissions and 30-day readmissions, shorter hospital stay, and significantly reduced hospital costs for all the procedures. At stratification by illness severity, the laparoscopic group showed better or comparable surgical outcomes across all the illness severity groups. However, the observed mortality was comparable for the minor and moderate severity patients between laparoscopic and open surgery for most procedures. The 30-day readmission rate for major/extreme severity patients was comparable between the two groups for most surgical procedures.
This study demonstrated the superiority of laparoscopy over conventional open surgery across all illness severity risk groups for common surgical procedures. The results in general show that laparoscopic surgery is safe, efficacious, and cost-effective compared with open surgery and suggest that laparoscopic surgery should be the procedure of choice for all common surgical procedures, regardless of illness severity.
KeywordsAppendectomy Cholecystectomy Colectomy Gastric bypass Laparoscopic surgery Open surgery Outcomes Reflux surgery Ventral hernia
Authors Manish M. Tiwari, Jason F. Reynoso, Robin High, Albert W. Tsang, and Dmitry Oleynikov have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 6.Colquitt J, Clegg A, Sidhu M, Royle P (2003) Surgery for morbid obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003641Google Scholar
- 16.Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006231Google Scholar
- 23.Peters MJ, Mukhtar A, Yunus RM, Khan S, Pappalardo J, Memon B, Memon MA (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 104:1548–1561 (quiz 1547, 1562)Google Scholar
- 30.Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2002) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001546Google Scholar
- 35.Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT (2010) Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery. Surg. Endosc 24:270–276Google Scholar
- 36.Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, Olon C, Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar