Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 1054–1061 | Cite as

Comparison of costs for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer

  • Sukki Cho
  • Young Woo Do
  • Eung Bae Lee
Article

Abstract

Background

To promote the broad use of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for lobectomy (VATSL) in the management of lung cancer, it should be proved cost-effective, especially in the current cost-sensitive climate. This study evaluated and compared the costs of VATSL and open lobectomy (OL) and analyzed how the surgeon’s experience level with VATSL affected the cost.

Methods

In this study, 86 patients in a VATSL group and 97 patients in an OL group underwent surgery for lung cancer. Cost comparisons were performed for the VATSL and OL groups between patients who had no complications and patients with and without complications according to tumor location and the learning period of the surgeon.

Results

Postoperative complications occurred for 56 patients (30.6%) (14 VATSL vs 42 OL patients; p < 0.05). Patients who underwent VATSL had significant reductions in both chest tube duration (5.4 vs 9.1 days; p = 0.000) and length of hospital stay (7.1 vs 12.0 days; p = 0.000). The mean operation time for VATSL was not significantly longer than for OL (145.8 vs 136.4 min; p = 0.782). The total hospital cost (i.e., that paid by the patient and national insurance combined) was lower for VATSL than for OL according to comparisons both among all patients ($5,391 vs $5,593, respectively) and among only noncomplicated patients ($4,684 vs $4,769, respectively). In terms of tumor location, the total hospital cost for the VATSL group was lower than for the OL group when the surgery was performed on the right lower lobe (RLL), left upper lobe (LUL), and left lower lobe (LLL). The costs were not significantly different between the two learning periods of the surgeons, except for the cost of anesthesia.

Conclusions

In Korea, VATSL for lung cancer had lower complication rates, shorter hospital stays, and lower total hospital costs than OL.

Keywords

Cost-effectiveness Learning curve Lobectomy VATS 

Notes

Disclosures

Sukki Cho, Young Woo Do, and Eung Bae Lee have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    McKenna RJ Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB (2006) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 81:421–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roviaro G, Varoli F, Vergani C, Nucca O, Maciocco M, Grignani F (2004) Long-term survival after videothoracoscopic lobectomy for stage I lung cancer. Chest 26:725–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sugi K, Kaneda Y, Esato K (2000) Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy achieves a satisfactory long-term prognosis in patients with clinical stage IA lung cancer. World J Surg 24:27–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Walker WS, Codispoti M, Soon SY, Stamenkovic S, Carnochan F, Pugh G (2003) Long-term outcomes following VATS lobectomy for non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:397–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D’Amico TA (2008) Long-term outcomes of thoracoscopic lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18:259–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crisci R, Coloni GF (1996) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax: a comparison of results and costs. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 10:556–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schramel FM, Sutedja TG, Braber JC, van Mourik JC, Postmus PE (1996) Cost-effectiveness of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus conservative treatment for first time or recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur Respir J 9:1821–1825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walker WS, Casali G (2008) The VATS lobectomist: analysis of costs and alterations in the traditional surgical working pattern in the modern surgical unit. Thorac Surg Clin 18:281–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mun M, Kohno T (2008) Video-assisted thoracic surgery for clinical stage I lung cancer in octogenarians. Ann Thorac Surg 85:406–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewis RJ, Caccavale RJ, Sisler GE, Bocage JP, O’Brien K, Warner S (1996) Is video-assisted thoracic surgery cost-effective? N J Med 93:35–41Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sugi K, Kaneda Y, Nawata K, Fujita N, Ueda K, Nawata S, Esato K (1998) Cost analysis for thoracoscopy: thoracoscopic wedge resection and lobectomy. Surg Today 28:41–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nakajima J, Takamoto S, Kohno T, Ohtsuka T (2000) Costs of videothoracoscopic surgery versus open resection for patients with of lung carcinoma. Cancer 89:2497–2501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoksch B, Ablassmaier B, Walter M, Muller M (2003) Complication rate after thoracoscopic and conventional lobectomy. Zentralbl Chir 128:106–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Schil P (2003) Cost analysis of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy: critical review. Eur Respir J 22:735–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Casali G, Walker WS (2009) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: can we afford it? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35:423–428Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Rij AM, McDonald JR, Pettigrew RA, Putterill MJ, Reddy CK, Wright JJ (1995) CUSUM as an aid to early assessment of the surgical trainee. Br J Surg 82:1500–1503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Kohler L, Barlehner E, Kockerling F (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15:116–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park JS, Kang SB, Kim SW, Cheon GN (2007) Economics and the laparoscopic surgery learning curve: comparison with open surgery for rectosigmoid cancer. World J Surg 31:1827–1834Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryKyungpook National University, School of MedicineDaeguKorea
  2. 2.Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryKyungpook National University HospitalJung-gu, DaeguRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations