Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is feasible in complex colorectal resections and could enable day case colectomy
- 361 Downloads
Fast-track surgery accelerates recovery, reduces morbidity, and shortens hospital stay. However, the benefits of laparoscopic versus open surgery remain unproven within a fast-track program. Case reports of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) colectomies are appearing with claims of cosmetic advantage and decreased parietal trauma. This report describes the largest case series of LESS colorectal surgery and its effects on recovery.
In this series, 20 consecutive unselected patients underwent LESS colorectal surgery including right hemicolectomy (n = 3), extended right hemicolectomy, high anterior resection (n = 2), low anterior resection involving total mesorectal excision (TME; n = 3), ileocolic anastomosis (n = 2, including 1 redo surgery), colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (n = 4, including 1 with ventral mesh rectopexy), panproctocolectomy (n = 2), proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch (n = 2) and an abdominoperineal excision of rectum. Single-port conventional instrumentation and transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block analgesia were used. The indications included cancer (n = 8), Crohn’s disease (n = 4), ulcerative colitis (n = 3) complicated diverticulosis (n = 2), and slow-transit constipation (n = 3). Eight of the patients had undergone previous surgery.
Most of the cases (90%) were managed successfully using the LESS technique and conventional instrumentation. Two operations (10%) were converted to standard laparoscopy, due to insufficient theater time and an unstable port. The operative time ranged from 45 to 240 min (median, 110 min). A normal diet was tolerated within 6 h by 7 patients and in 12 to 16 h (overnight) by 11 patients. Complications included anastomotic bleed (n = 1), ileus (n = 2), acute renal failure secondary to hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia (n = 1), urine retention (n = 1), and wound infection (n = 1). The median hospital stay was 46 h (range, 7–384 h). Eight patients were discharged within 24 h. There was one readmission (5%).
Laparoendoscopic single-site colorectal resection using conventional instrumentation is feasible and safe when performed by an experienced team. The LESS approach may have advantages in terms of minimal pain, cosmesis, lower costs, and faster recovery. A randomized trial is required to confirm whether LESS offers a true patient benefit over standard laparoscopic resection.
KeywordsDay case colectomy ERAS Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery Laparoscopic colorectal surgery LESS NOTES SILS Surgery
A. C. Goede is funded by noncommitment educational grant from Ethicon Endosurgery.
K. J. Gash, W. Chambers, G. L. Greenslade, and have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 1.Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2008) Short-term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3)CD003145. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD003145.pub2
- 14.Lacy A, Delgado S, Rojas O, Almenara R, Blasi A, Llach J (2008) MA-NOS radical sigmoidectomy: a report of a transvaginal resection in a human. Surg Endosc 18:1077–1082Google Scholar
- 15.Cheung HY, Leung AL, Chung CC, Ng DC, Li MK (2009) Endolaparoscopi colectomy without minilaparotomy for left sided colonic tumours, World.J.Surg. Epub ahead of print 4 AprilGoogle Scholar
- 17.Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, Poblete H, King SA, Curcillo PG (2009) Single-port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach. J.Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. Epub ahead of print 4 MarchGoogle Scholar
- 23.Rieger NA, Lam FF (2009) SILS colectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc. Epub ahead of print. 16 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
- 26.First single-incision total colectomy performed at the Mayo Clinic. http://www.mayoclinic.org/news2009-sct/5326.html. Accessed 23 June 2009
- 27.Saint Louis University Hospital is one of first to perform total abdominal colectomy via single-incision laparoscopic surgery. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/172660.php. Accessed 2 December 2009
- 28.Zafar N, Davies R, Greenslade GLG, Dixon AR (2009) The evolution of analgesia in an “accelerated” recovery programme for resectional laparoscopic colorectal surgery with an anastomosis. Colorectal Dis. Epub ahead of print 16 JanuaryGoogle Scholar
- 33.Dalton SJ, Ghosh A, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2009) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: why would you not want to have it and, more importantly, not be trained in it? A consecutive series of 500 elective resections with anastomoses. Colorectal Dis. Published Online: 2 November 2009Google Scholar