Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 835–840 | Cite as

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is feasible in complex colorectal resections and could enable day case colectomy

  • K. J. Gash
  • A. C. Goede
  • W. Chambers
  • G. L. Greenslade
  • A. R. Dixon
Article

Abstract

Background

Fast-track surgery accelerates recovery, reduces morbidity, and shortens hospital stay. However, the benefits of laparoscopic versus open surgery remain unproven within a fast-track program. Case reports of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) colectomies are appearing with claims of cosmetic advantage and decreased parietal trauma. This report describes the largest case series of LESS colorectal surgery and its effects on recovery.

Methods

In this series, 20 consecutive unselected patients underwent LESS colorectal surgery including right hemicolectomy (n = 3), extended right hemicolectomy, high anterior resection (n = 2), low anterior resection involving total mesorectal excision (TME; n = 3), ileocolic anastomosis (n = 2, including 1 redo surgery), colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (n = 4, including 1 with ventral mesh rectopexy), panproctocolectomy (n = 2), proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch (n = 2) and an abdominoperineal excision of rectum. Single-port conventional instrumentation and transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block analgesia were used. The indications included cancer (n = 8), Crohn’s disease (n = 4), ulcerative colitis (n = 3) complicated diverticulosis (n = 2), and slow-transit constipation (n = 3). Eight of the patients had undergone previous surgery.

Results

Most of the cases (90%) were managed successfully using the LESS technique and conventional instrumentation. Two operations (10%) were converted to standard laparoscopy, due to insufficient theater time and an unstable port. The operative time ranged from 45 to 240 min (median, 110 min). A normal diet was tolerated within 6 h by 7 patients and in 12 to 16 h (overnight) by 11 patients. Complications included anastomotic bleed (n = 1), ileus (n = 2), acute renal failure secondary to hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia (n = 1), urine retention (n = 1), and wound infection (n = 1). The median hospital stay was 46 h (range, 7–384 h). Eight patients were discharged within 24 h. There was one readmission (5%).

Conclusion

Laparoendoscopic single-site colorectal resection using conventional instrumentation is feasible and safe when performed by an experienced team. The LESS approach may have advantages in terms of minimal pain, cosmesis, lower costs, and faster recovery. A randomized trial is required to confirm whether LESS offers a true patient benefit over standard laparoscopic resection.

Keywords

Day case colectomy ERAS Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery Laparoscopic colorectal surgery LESS NOTES SILS Surgery 

Notes

Acknowledgment

A. C. Goede is funded by noncommitment educational grant from Ethicon Endosurgery.

Disclosures

K. J. Gash, W. Chambers, G. L. Greenslade, and have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lacey AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2008) Short-term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3)CD003145. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD003145.pub2
  5. 5.
    Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Lacy AM, Castells A, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Brown J, Delgado S, Kuhrij E, Haglind E, Pahlman L (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142:298–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Basse L, Thorbol JE, Lossi K, Kehley H (2004) Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum 47:271–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L, Billesbølle P, Lund C, Mogensen T, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2005) Functional recovery after open vs laparoscopic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 241:416–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Junghans T, Raue W, Hasse O, Neudecker K, Schwenk W (2006) Value of laparoscopic surgery in elective colorectal surgery with “fast track” rehabilitation. Zentralbl Chir 131:298–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P, Franks PJ, Longman RJ, Kendrick AH, Kipling RM, Kennedy RH (2006) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an accelerated recovery programme. Br J Surg 93:300–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    MacKay G, Ihedioha U, McConnache A, Serpell M, Molloy RG, O’Dwyer PJ (2007) Laparoscopic colonic resection in fast-track patients does not enhance short-term recovery after elective surgery. Colorectal Dis 9:368–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Polle SW, Wind J, Fuhring JW, Holland J, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2007) Implementation of a Fast-Track Perioperative Care Programme: What are the difficulties? Dig Surg 24:441–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vlug MS, Wind J, van der Zaag E, Ubbink DT, Cense HA, Bemelman WA (2009) Systematic review of laparocopic vs open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis 11:335–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezend RA, Ringers J, Griffioen G, Bemeiman WA (1998) Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopically assisted and open ileocoloic resection for Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc 12:1334–1340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lacy A, Delgado S, Rojas O, Almenara R, Blasi A, Llach J (2008) MA-NOS radical sigmoidectomy: a report of a transvaginal resection in a human. Surg Endosc 18:1077–1082Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cheung HY, Leung AL, Chung CC, Ng DC, Li MK (2009) Endolaparoscopi colectomy without minilaparotomy for left sided colonic tumours, World.J.Surg. Epub ahead of print 4 AprilGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ates O, Hakguder G, Olgunner M, Akgur FM (2007) Single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy conducted intracorporeally with the aid of a transabdominal sling suture. J Paediatr Surg 42:1071–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, Poblete H, King SA, Curcillo PG (2009) Single-port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely transumbilical approach. J.Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. Epub ahead of print 4 MarchGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gill IS, Canes D, Aron M, Haber GP, Goldfarb DA, Flechner S, Desai MR, Kaouk JH, Desai MM (2008) Single-port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy. J Urol 180:637–641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Desai MM, Pradeep P, Rao PP, Aron M, Pascal-Haber G, Desai MR, Mishra S, Kaouk JH, Gill IS (2008) Scarless single-port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int 101:83–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hirano D, Minei S, Kishimoto Y, Yoshikawa T, Yoshida T, Takimoto Y (2005) Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours via a single large port. J Endourol 19:788–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bucher P, Pugin E, Morel P (2008) Single-port-access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1013–1016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk HT, Kaouk JH, Geisier DP (2008) Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:823–826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rieger NA, Lam FF (2009) SILS colectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments. Surg Endosc. Epub ahead of print. 16 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2010) Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for benign disease. Colorectal Dis 12:61–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brunner W, Schirnhofer J, Waldstein-Wartenberg N, Frass R, Weiss H (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic sigmoid colon resections without visible scar: a novel technique. Colorectal Dis 12:66–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    First single-incision total colectomy performed at the Mayo Clinic. http://www.mayoclinic.org/news2009-sct/5326.html. Accessed 23 June 2009
  27. 27.
    Saint Louis University Hospital is one of first to perform total abdominal colectomy via single-incision laparoscopic surgery. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/172660.php. Accessed 2 December 2009
  28. 28.
    Zafar N, Davies R, Greenslade GLG, Dixon AR (2009) The evolution of analgesia in an “accelerated” recovery programme for resectional laparoscopic colorectal surgery with an anastomosis. Colorectal Dis. Epub ahead of print 16 JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Swanstrom LL, Volkmann E, Hungness E, Soper NJ (2009) Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1519–1525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Volkmann E, Hungness E, Soper NJ, Swanstrom L (2009) Surgeon perceptions of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). J Gastrointest Surg 13:1401–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Esposito C (1998) One-trocar appendicectomy in paediatric surgery. Surg Endosc 12:177–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Piskun G, Rajpal S (1999) Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incision outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:361–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dalton SJ, Ghosh A, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2009) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: why would you not want to have it and, more importantly, not be trained in it? A consecutive series of 500 elective resections with anastomoses. Colorectal Dis. Published Online: 2 November 2009Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Burghardt J, Federlein M, Muller V, Benhidjeb T, Elling D, Gellert K (2008) Minimal invasive transvaginal right hemicolectomy: report of the first complex NOS (natural orifice surgery) bowels operation using a hybrid approach. Zentralhl Chir 133:574–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fearon K, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaugd A, Dejongc CHC, Lassend K, Nygrenb J, Hauselb J, Soopb M, Andersene J, Kehletef H (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus view of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. J. Gash
    • 1
  • A. C. Goede
    • 1
    • 2
  • W. Chambers
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. L. Greenslade
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. R. Dixon
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.North Bristol NHS Trust, Frenchay HospitalBristolUK
  2. 2.SPIRE Hospital BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations