Surgery in space: the future of robotic telesurgery
- 1.9k Downloads
The origins of telemedicine date back to the early 1970s, and combined with the concept of minimally invasive surgery, the idea of surgical robotics was born in the late 1980s based on the principle of providing active telepresence to surgeons. Many research projects were initiated, creating a set of instruments for endoscopic telesurgery, while visionary surgeons built networks for telesurgical patient care, demonstrated transcontinental surgery, and performed procedures in weightlessness. Long-distance telesurgery became the testbed for new medical support concepts of space missions.
This article provides a complete review of the milestone experiments in the field, and describes a feasible concept to extend telemedicine beyond Earth orbit. With a possible foundation of an extraplanetary human outpost either on the Moon or on Mars, space agencies are carefully looking for effective and affordable solutions for life-support and medical care. The major challenges of surgery in weightlessness are also discussed.
Teleoperated surgical robots have the potential to shape the future of extreme health care both in space and on Earth. Besides the apparent advantages, there are some serious challenges, primarily the difficulty of latency with teleoperation over long distances. Advanced virtualization and augmented-reality techniques should help human operators to adapt better to the special conditions. To meet safety standards and requirements in space, a three-layered architecture is recommended to provide the highest quality of telepresence technically achievable for provisional exploration missions.
Surgical robotic technology is an emerging interdisciplinary field, with a great potential impact on many areas of health care, including telemedicine. With the proposed three-layered concept—relying only on currently available technology—effective support of long-distance telesurgery and human space missions are both feasible.
KeywordsRobotic surgery Teleoperation Minimally invasive surgery Weightlessness
The research was supported by the National Office for Research and Technology (NKTH), Hungarian National Scientific Research Foundation grants OTKA T69055, CK80316.
Drs. Benyó, Sándor, and Haidegger have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 1.Pease RWJ (ed) (2003) Medical dictionary. Merriam-Webster, USAGoogle Scholar
- 2.SAGES Group (2000) Guidelines for the surgical practice of telemedicine. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 14(10):975–979Google Scholar
- 10.Allen CS, Burnett R, Charles J, Cucinotta F, Fullerton R, Goodman JR, Griffith AD, Kosmo JJ, Perchonok M, Railsback J, Rajulu S, Stilwell D, Thomas G, Tri T (2003) Guidelines and capabilities for designing human missions, NASA/Johnson Space Center, TM-2003-210785Google Scholar
- 11.Alexander AD (1973) Impacts of telemation on modern society. Proc. of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 17(2):299–304Google Scholar
- 15.Ballantyne GH, Marescaux J, Giulianotti PC (eds) (2004) Primer of robotic & telerobotic surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
- 16.Flynn E (2005) Telesurgery in the United States. J Homeland Defense 6:24–28Google Scholar
- 19.Kumar S, Marescaux J (eds) (2008) Telesurgery. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 20.Rayman R (2009) Is surgery a remote possibility? Robotic surgical system under development has telesurgery capabilities. Health Technol Trends 21(7):5–7Google Scholar
- 24.Kamler K (2007) How I Survived a Zero-G Robot Operating Room: Extreme Surgeon. Popular Mechanics—online edition. Available: www.popularmechanics.com/science/robotics/4230102.html
- 27.Rentschler ME, Dumpert J, Platt SR, Oleynikov D, Farritor SM, Iagnemma K (2006) Mobile In Vivo Biopsy Robot. Proc. of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, pp 4155–4160Google Scholar
- 28.Menciassi A, Dario P (2009) Miniaturized robotic devices for endoluminal diagnosis and surgery: a single-module and a multiple-module approach. Proc. 31st Int Conf of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp 6842–6845. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5334474
- 29.Eirik L, Johansen B, Gjelsvik T, Langø T (2009) Ultrasound based localization of wireless microrobotic endoscopic capsule for the GI tract. Proc. 21st Conference of the Society for Medical Innovation and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- 30.Lum M, Friedman D, Sankaranarayanan G, King H, Wright A, Sinanan M, Lendvay T, Rosen J, Hannaford B (2008) Objective assessment of telesurgical robot systems: Telerobotic FLS. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality (MMVR). Long Beach, CA, pp 263–265Google Scholar
- 31.King H, Hannaford B, Kwok K, Yang G, Griffiths P, Okamura A, et al (2010) Plugfest 2009: global interoperability in telerobotics and telemedicine. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, AK, pp 1733–1738Google Scholar
- 34.Rayman R, Croome K, Galbraith N, Mcclure R, Morady R, Peterson S, Smith S, Subotic V, Van Wynsberghe A, Patel R, Primak S (2007) Robotic telesurgery: a real-world comparison of ground- and satellite-based Internet performance. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 3:111–116. doi: 10.1002/rcs.133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F, Gugliotta F, Mazzone P, Gulletta S, Sora N, Sala S, Marzi A, Augello A, Livolsi L, Santagostino A, Santinelli V (2006) Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(7):1390–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.058 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Doctors remove tumor in first zero-g surgery. New Scientist (September 2006). Available: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn10169-doctors-remove-tumour-in-first-zerog-surgery.html
- 40.Berlocher G (2009) Minimizing Latency in Satellite Networks. Via Satellite, Published at: www.viasatellite.com
- 41.Lum MJ, Rosen J, Lendvay TS, Wright AS, Sinanan MN, Hannaford B (2008) TeleRobotic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS): effects of time delay-pilot study. Proceedings of the international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 5597–600. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650483
- 42.Campbell MR, Billica RD (2008) Surgical capabilities. In: Barratt MR, Pool SL (eds) Principles of clinical medicine for space flight. Springer, Berlin, Ch. 6., pp 123–138Google Scholar