Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 124–129 | Cite as

Current analysis of endoloops in appendiceal stump closure

  • Maik Sahm
  • Rainer Kube
  • Sybille Schmidt
  • Christina Ritter
  • Matthias Pross
  • Hans Lippert



An inadequate closure of the appendix stump leads to intra-abdominal surgical site infection. The effectiveness of various appendiceal stump closure methods, for instance, staplers or endoloops, was evaluated. Many analyses show that the use of a stapler for transection and closure of the appendiceal stump lowers the risk of this infection but a statistically significant risk of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess or wound infection was not considered in any randomized study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complications after using endoloops in a high-volume center.


The data of 1,790 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between January 1998 and December 2006 and a single center was prospectively acquired. The standard procedure used was an appendiceal stump closure using endoloops and a selective use of staplers. The outcome criteria for inclusion in the study were intra-abdominal abscess formations, other specific intraoperative and postoperative complications, and the different costs of the operation.


Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 1,790 (80.8%) patients and open appendectomy in 425 (19.2%) patients. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 74 (4.13%) patients. Laparoscopic appendectomy with stump closure using endoloops was performed in 1,670 (97.3%) patients and stump closure using a stapler in 46 (2.7%) patients. Among 851 patients with acute appendicitis, 284 patients with perforated appendicitis, and 535 patients with other or no pathology, the rate of intra-abdominal abscess after using an endoloop or a stapler was not significantly different (1.5 vs. 0%, p = 0.587; 3.5 vs. 4.2%, p = 0.870; 0.7% vs. 0, p = 0.881, respectively). There were no significant differences between the endoloop group and the stapler group with respect to the other specific intraoperative and postoperative complications.


This study shows the safety of the endoloop for clinical daily routine. A selective procedure for stump closure has been established. Appendiceal stump closure using an endoloop is an easy, safe, and cost-effective procedure.


Laparoscopic appendectomy Appendiceal stump closure Endoloop 



Maik Sahm, Rainer Kube, Sybille Schmidt, Christina Ritter, Matthias Pross, and Hans Lippert have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Semm K (1983) Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15:59–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hanssen A, Plotnikov S, Dubois R (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump. JSLS 11:59–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beldi G, Muggli K, Helbling C, Schlumpf R (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy using endoloops: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 18:749–750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beldi G, Vorburger SA, Bruegger LE, Kocher T, Inderbitzin D, Candinas D (2006) Analysis of stapling versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Br J Surg 93:1390–1393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chikamori F, Kuniyoshi N, Shibuya S, Takase Y (2002) Appendiceal stump abscess as an early complication of laparoscopic appendectomy: report of a case. Surg Today 32:919–921CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liang MK, Lo HG, Marks JL (2006) Stump appendicitis: a comprehensive review of literature. Am Surg 72:162–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Montali I, Klug S, von Flue M (2008) Right-sided lower abdominal pain after appendectomy? Chirurg 79:1077–1079CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simpson J, Samaraweera AP, Sara RK, Lobo DN (2008) Acute appendicitis—a benign disease? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90:313–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Faiz O, Clark J, Brown T, Bottle A, Antoniou A, Farrands P, Darzi A, Aylin P (2008) Traditional and laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: outcomes in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2006. Ann Surg 248:800–806CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Sugiyama K, Fukunaga M (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg 33:208–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Muller M, Terzic A, Rodehorst A, Mahfouz M, Bottger T (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy as training procedure for all stages of appendicitis. Zentralbl Chir 132:10–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kapischke M, Bley K, Tepel J, Schulz T (2005) Open versus laparoscopic operation for perforated appendicitis—a comparative study. Zentralbl Chir 130:137–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horstmann R, Tiwisina C, Classen C, Palmes D, Gillessen A (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which factors influence the decision between the surgical techniques? Zentralbl Chir 130:48–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Piskun G, Kozik D, Rajpal S, Shaftan G, Fogler R (2001) Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 15:660–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kouwenhoven EA, Repelaer van Driel OJ, van Erp WF (2005) Fear for the intraabdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy: not realistic. Surg Endosc 19:923–926CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tanaka S, Kubota D, Lee SH, Oba K, Matsuyama M (2007) Effectiveness of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis. Osaka City Med J 53:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hirano Y, Ishikawa N, Omura K, Inaki N, Hiranuma C, Waseda R, Watanabe G (2007) Robotic intragastric surgery: a new surgical approach for the gastric lesion. Surg Endosc 21:2112–2114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klima S (1998) Importance of appendix stump management in laparoscopic appendectomy. Zentralbl Chir 123(Suppl 4):90–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kazemier G, in’t Hof KH, Saad S, Bonjer HJ, Sauerland S (2006) Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc 20:1473–1476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koch A, Marusch F, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2002) Appendicitis in the last decade of the 20th century—analysis of two prospective multicenter clinical observational studies. Zentralbl Chir 127:290–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ritz JP, Stufler M, Buhr HJ (2007) Minimally invasive surgery and the economics of it. Can minimally invasive surgery be cost efficient from a business point of view? Chirurg 78:501–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maik Sahm
    • 1
  • Rainer Kube
    • 2
  • Sybille Schmidt
    • 1
  • Christina Ritter
    • 1
  • Matthias Pross
    • 1
  • Hans Lippert
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryDRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Klinik für ChirurgieBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of General, Visceral and Vascular SurgeryOtto von Guericke UniversityMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations