Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 3080–3085 | Cite as

Population-based trend analysis of laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplications for gastroesophageal reflux disease

  • U. Zingg
  • L. Rosella
  • U. GullerEmail author



The Nissen and Toupet fundoplications are the most commonly used techniques for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. To date, no population-based trend analysis has been reported examining the choice of procedure and short-term outcomes. This study was designed to analyze trends in the use of Nissen versus Toupet fundoplications, and corresponding short-term outcomes during a 10-year period between 1995 and 2004.


A trend analysis was performed of 873 patients (Toupet: 254 patients, Nissen: 619 patients) prospectively enrolled in the database of the Swiss Association for Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery.


The frequency of the performed techniques remained stable during the observation period (p value for trend 0.206). The average postoperative and total length of hospital stay both significantly decreased during the 10-year period from 5.6 to 4.0 days and 6.8 to 4.8 days, respectively (both p values for trend <0.001). The average duration of surgery decreased significantly from 141 minutes to 121 minutes (p value for trend <0.001). There was a trend towards less complications in later years (2000–2004) compared to early years (1995–1999, p = 0.058). Conversion rates were significantly lower in later years compared with early years (p = 0.004).


This is the first trend analysis in the literature reporting clinical outcomes of 873 prospectively enrolled patients undergoing Nissen and Toupet fundoplications during a 10-year period. The proportion of laparoscopic Nissen versus Toupet fundoplications remained stable over time, indicating that literature reports of the advantages of one procedure over the other had minimal influence on surgeons’ choice of technique.

Length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, morbidity, and conversion rate decreased over time, reflecting the learning curve. Clearly, patient outcomes have much improved during the 10-year observation period.


Laparoscopic fundoplication Nissen Toupet Trend analysis Outcome 



The authors thank Dr. R. Whitfield, MBBS, FRACS, for revising the manuscript.


This study was supported by grants from Johnson & Johnson and Covidien. Drs. Zingg, Rosella, and Guller have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Grant AM, Wileman SM, Ramsay CR, Mowat NA, Krukowski ZH, Heading RC, Thursz MR, Campbell MK (2008) Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: UK collaborative randomized trial. BMJ 337:a2664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Catarci M, Gentileschi P, Papi C, Carrara A, Marrese R, Gaspari AL, Grassi GB (2004) Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication. Ann Surg 239:325–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ackroyd R, Watson DI, Majeed AW, Troy G, Treacy PJ, Stoddard CJ (2004) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 91:975–982CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Draaisma WA, Rijnhart-de Jong HG, Broeders IA, Smout AJ, Furnee EJ, Gooszen HG (2006) Five-year subjective and objective results of laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication. Ann Surg 244:34–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM, Pasiut M, Haas CF, Wykypiel H, Pointner R (2002) Long-term results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 16:753–757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stylopoulos N, Rattner DW (2005) The history of hiatal hernia surgery. From Bowditch to laparoscopy. Ann Surg 241:185–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Limpert PA, Naunheim KS (2005) Partial versus total fundoplication: is there a correct answer? Surg Clin North Am 85:399–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hunter JG, Swanstrom L, Waring PJ (1996) Dysphagia after laparoscopic reflux surgery. The impact of operative technique. Ann Surg 224:51–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hunter JG, Trus TL, Branum GD, Waring JP, Wood WC (1996) A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 223:673–687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guerin E, Betroune K, Closset J, Mehdi A, Lefebvre JC, Houben JJ, Gelin M, Vaneukem P, El Nakadi I (2007) Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication: results of a randomized and multicentre trial. Surg Endosc 21:1985–1990CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laws HL, Clements RH, Swillie CM (1997) A randomized, prospective comparison of the Nissen fundoplication versus the Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 225:647–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Booth MI, Stratford J, Jones L, Dehn TCB (2008) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic total (Nissen) versus posterior partial (Toupet) fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease based on preoperative oesophageal manometry. Br J Surg 96:57–63Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strate U, Emmermann A, Fibbe C, Layer P, Zornig C (2008) Laparoscopic fundoplication: Nissen versus Toupet two-year outcome of a prospective randomized study of 200 patients regarding postoperative esophageal motility. Surg Endosc 22:21–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lundell L, Abrahamsson H, Ruth M, Rydberg L, Lonroth H, Olbe L (1996) Long-term results of a prospective randomized comparison of total fundic wrap (Nissen-Rossetti) or semifundoplication (Toupet) for gastro-oesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 83:830–835CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zaninotto G, Molena D, Ancona E (2000) A prospective multicenter study on laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Italy: type of surgery, conversions, complications, and early results. Study group for the laparoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease of the Italian society of Endoscopic surgery (SICE). Surg Endosc 14:282–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Windsor JA, Yellapu S (2000) Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in New Zealand: A trend towards partial fundoplication. ANZ J Surg 70:184–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Erenoglu C, Miller A, Schirmer B (2003) Laparoscopic Toupet versus Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Int Surg 88:219–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huttl TP, Hohle M, Wichmann MW, Jauch KW, Meyer G (2005) Techniques and results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in Germany. Surg Endosc 19:1579–1587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sandbu R, Haglund U, Arvidsson D, Hallgren T (2000) Antireflux surgery in Sweden, 1987–1997: a decade of change. Scand J Gastroenterol 35:345–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Viljakka M, Luostarinen M, Isolauri J (1997) Incidence of antireflux surgery in Finland 1988–1993. Influence of proton-pump inhibitors and laparoscopic technique. Scand J Gastroenterol 32:415–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Finlayson SR, Laycock WS, Birkmeyer JD (2003) National trends in utilization and outcomes of antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 17:864–867CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Finlayson SR, Stroupe KT, Joseph GJ, Fisher ES (2002) Using the Veterans Health Administration inpatient care database: trends in the use of antireflux surgery. Eff Clin Pract 5:E5Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Inderbitzin DT, Opitz I, Giger U, Kocher T, Kraehenbuehl L (2007) Incidence of clinical pulmonary embolism after laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 94:599–603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Funch-Jensen P, Jacobsen B (2007) Dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Scand J Gastroenterol 42:428–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gotley DC, Smithers BM, Menzies B, Branicki FJ, Rhodes M, Nathanson L (1996) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and postoperative dysphagia-can it be predicted? Ann Acad Med Singapore 25:646–649PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang H, Watson DI, Lally CJ, Devitt PG, Game PA, Jamieson GG (2008) Randomized trial of division versus nondivision of the short gastric vessels during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Ann Surg 247:38–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Watson DI, de Beaux AC (2001) Complications of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 15:344–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Finks JF, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD (2006) The rise and fall of antireflux surgery in the United States. Surg Endosc 20:1698–1701CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schneeweiss S, Maclure M, Dormuth CR, Glynn RJ, Canning C, Avorn J (2006) A therapeutic substitution policy for proton pump inhibitors: clinical and economic consequences. Clin Pharmacol Ther 79:379–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marshall JK, Grootendorst PV, O’Brien BJ, Dolovich LR, Holbrook AM, Levy AR (2002) Impact of reference-based pricing for histamine-2 receptor antagonists and restricted access for proton ump inhibitors in British Colombia. CMAJ 166:1655–1662PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    van Driel ML, Vander Stichele R, de Maeseneer J, de Sutter, Christiaens T (2007) Medical evidence and health policy: a marriage of convenience? The case of proton pump inhibitors. J Eval Clin Pract 13:674–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brunt LM, Quasebarth MA, Dunnegan DL, Sopher NJ (1999) Is laparoscopic antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly safe and effective? Surg Endosc 13:838–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hwang H, Turner L, Blair NP (2005) Examining the learning curve of laparoscopic fundoplications at an urban community hospital. Am J Surg 189:522–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zacharoulis D, O’Boyle CJ, Sedman PC, Brough WA, Royston CMS (2006) Laparoscopic fundoplication: a 10-year learning curve. Surg Endosc 20:1662–1670CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guller U (2006) Surgical outcomes research based on administrative data: inferior or complementary to prospective randomized clinical trials. World J Surg 30:255–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Division of Visceral Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, InselspitalUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations